EU EU decides to end glued batteries

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Making batteries more sustainable, more durable and better-performing​

14-06-2023 - 12:48​
  • More stringent targets for waste collection, recycling efficiency, and material recovery​
  • Tougher sustainability, performance and labelling requirements​
  • Due diligence policy to address social and environmental risks​
  • Portable batteries in appliances will be easier to replace​
On Wednesday, Parliament approved new rules for the design, production and waste management of all types of batteries sold in the EU.

With 587 votes in favour, nine against and 20 abstentions, MEPs endorsed a deal reached with the Council to overhaul EU rules on batteries and waste batteries. The new law takes into account technological developments and future challenges in the sector and will cover the entire battery life cycle, from design to end-of-life.

Key measures foreseen by the regulation:
  • A compulsory carbon footprint declaration and label for electric vehicles (EV) batteries, light means of transport (LMT) batteries (e.g. for electric scooters and bikes), and rechargeable industrial batteries with a capacity above 2kWh;
  • Designing portable batteries in appliances in such a way that consumers can themselves easily remove and replace them;
  • A digital battery passport for LMT batteries, industrial batteries with a capacity above 2 kWh, and EV batteries;
  • A due diligence policy for all economic operators, except for SMEs;
  • Stricter waste collection targets: for portable batteries - 45% by 2023, 63% by 2027 and 73% by 2030; for LMT batteries - 51% by 2028 and 61% by 2031;
  • Minimum levels of materials recovered from waste batteries: lithium - 50% by 2027 and 80% by 2031; cobalt, copper, lead and nickel - 90% by 2027 and 95% by 2031;
  • Minimum levels of recycled content from manufacturing and consumer waste for use in new batteries: eight years after the entry into force of the regulation - 16% for cobalt, 85% for lead, 6% for lithium and 6% for nickel; 13 years after the entry into force: 26% for cobalt, 85% for lead, 12% for lithium and 15% for nickel.

Quote
Rapporteur Achille Variati (S&D, IT) said: “For the first time, we have circular economy legislation that covers the entire life cycle of a product - an approach that is good for both the environment and the economy. We agreed on measures that greatly benefit consumers: batteries will be well-functioning, safer and easier to remove. Our overall aim is to build a stronger EU recycling industry, particularly for lithium, and a competitive industrial sector as a whole, which is crucial in the coming decades for our continent’s energy transition and strategic autonomy. These measures could become a benchmark for the entire global battery market."

Next steps
Following the final vote in plenary, the Council will now have to formally endorse the text before its publication in the EU Official Journal shortly after and its entry into force.

Background
In December 2020, the Commission presented a proposal for a regulation on batteries and waste batteries. The proposal aims to strengthen the functioning of the internal market, promoting a circular economy and reducing the environmental and social impact throughout all stages of the battery life cycle. The initiative is closely linked to the European Green Deal, the Circular Economy Action Plan and the New Industrial Strategy.

In adopting this report, Parliament is responding to citizens' expectations to enhance European energy security, provide green infrastructure and build a circular economy, as expressed in Proposals 3(3), 3(6), 4(3), 5(1), 5(3) and 5(8) of the conclusions of the Conference on the Future of Europe.

S | A
 
It is how it should be with end user replaceable batteries. Everything used to have replacable batteries. then they just stopped fucking doing that. My electronics knowledge is good enough to know that it was a choice for them and has nothing to do with the need to do so for design reasons. It is perfectly possible to make a device with a removable battery without any compromises with the exception of its dust and water resistance ratings, but there are solutions for that as well.
 
I'd love to go back to repairing shit. I repair my clothes myself and try to fix whatever I can fix myself. But phones? You can only throw them away and get a new one. And that is what pisses me off.
 
It is perfectly possible to make a device with a removable battery without any compromises with the exception of its dust and water resistance ratings, but there are solutions for that as well.
not if you want that apple FLAT and THIN look. because you know hardware as thin as a paper is considered sleek and high-tech, not a crapshot with all kinds of compromises (see butterfly keyboards).
being part of planned obsolescence (just buy a new one, or get a replacement for some fee if you're lucky) is another feature of that.
 
Based, fuck glued in batteries. Biggest pain in the ass to replace ever.
 
Holy based, I might need to import my next phone from the EU.
If this makes phones thicker or heavier I don't want it. I'm quite happy with iPhones as is.
29548 - SoyBooru.png
>Umm sweaty, the lightning connector is superior to USB-C because it just IS, ok?
 
Wow, the EU is finally doing something that's actually beneficial to the consumers and not being a bunch of useless bureaucrats that only know how to shove money in their pockets and vote for draconian laws because the lobbyists told them to do so.

Fuck yes, I want to see removable batteries in smartphones, especially if they also force manufacturers to sell replacements at an affordable price so they won't do a 180 and sell you replacements for like 200$ or making them serialized or some shit like that.

And if anyone says that this will lead to thicker phones and no water resistance, I have one single counterargument that you cannot refute:
1687017204179.png
Samsung Galaxy S5 from 2014.

It was 8.10mm thick, it had a removable battery and it was waterproof. There is zero excuse to not be able to make a thin phone with a replaceable battery AND making it waterproof. Everyone got gaslighted by Apple that it's impossible, even though Samsung proved that it is possible. All you need is to not be aiming for planned obsolescence and use a rubber gasket. That's all there is to it.
 
USB-D is better than USB-C. Euros forever stuck on outdated formats once that law goes in effect.
It's not about using USB-C in perpetuity. The standard will align with technological advancements, but for now it is USB C


 
Holy based, I might need to import my next phone from the EU.

View attachment 5167457
>Umm sweaty, the lightning connector is superior to USB-C because it just IS, ok?
There is more fuckery with cell phones than any other device on the planet, so I'd make damn sure your carrier will let you use it before you import one. Even if it's a model also sold domestically.
 
If this leads to easier smartphone repair, I'd call it a rare and probably accidental W for the EU lol
So would I but they will fuck it up and they will also attach a boatload of extra damaging crap on top.

Remember this is the organization that created the GDPR rules which were supposed to increase privacy by making cookies optional and had the effect of FORCING you to accept cookies because whereas before you could just block cookies from a site, now it results in constant nagging pop-ups which the site is forced by law to shove in your face until you accept a cookie from them saying you don't want cookies.

If you think Biden can fuck things up, you haven't seen anything until you've seen the full power of EU incompetence.

Incompetence and Grift. Hard to say which the EU does more of.
 
Fuck yes, I want to see removable batteries in smartphones, especially if they also force manufacturers to sell replacements at an affordable price so they won't do a 180 and sell you replacements for like 200$ or making them serialized or some shit like that.
They shouldn't force manufacturers to sell at any price. Bongland is doing that with energy companies and it's a mess. As price caps almost always are. What the could do which would achieve the same thing but better, is forbid manufacturers to do things which prevent others making compatible batteries.

You don't have to price fix, just prevent collusion from shutting out competitors. Then replacement batteries will hit their natural point.
 
They shouldn't force manufacturers to sell at any price. Bongland is doing that with energy companies and it's a mess. As price caps almost always are. What the could do which would achieve the same thing but better, is forbid manufacturers to do things which prevent others making compatible batteries.

You don't have to price fix, just prevent collusion from shutting out competitors. Then replacement batteries will hit their natural point.
I don't entirely agree with this. In the laptop space (for example), third party batteries are such absolute Chinesium horseshit that I do think it might be necessary to force OEMs to sell theirs.
 
I don't entirely agree with this. In the laptop space (for example), third party batteries are such absolute Chinesium horseshit that I do think it might be necessary to force OEMs to sell theirs.
How much of that is because of artificial lockouts though? For example Lenovo's firmware tries to reject third-party batteries, so probably the only companies making replacements are fly-by-night operations willing to bypass DRM or scavenge chips from old broken hardware. Maybe more reputable players would enter the market if it was actually a free market.
 
Back
Top Bottom