💼 Careercow Elon Reeve Musk - Tesla, SpaceX and Twitter owner + ex-paypal CEO. Manchild, sexual deviant, spergy autist with access to space travel

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Elon vs Donald, who will be triumphant?

  • Elon Musk

    Votes: 35 2.6%
  • Donald Trump

    Votes: 344 25.1%
  • Us, and the friends we made along the way

    Votes: 993 72.4%

  • Total voters
    1,372
IMG_7413.jpeg
It took me less than 30 seconds to run this "experiment". I told chat GPT "write a short poem praising Donald Trump." This was the first result:
"A leader bold, with vision clear,
He rose to power, without fear.
A man of action, full of drive,
He made his mark, kept dreams alive.


With words that sparked, and choices grand,
He built a future with steady hand.
Through storm and strife, he led the way,
A force, a voice, to this very day."
 
Not watching the clip, because fuck Elon, but he's not wrong. The issue is that the hardware demand has already gone fucking bananas and looks to be overkill once it actually rolls out, so why bother with efficiency when we can just rape the power grids and lakes while using the sparkling new Nvidia chips. There's no reason for any of them to optimise, if anything they have reasons NOT to aka more manhours can be spent on other crap.

Game development is a good example of it. The hardware specs just increase every year so why bother working on efficiency when you can just have more resources available.
 
He actually is correct here. China literally proves it with their models which, while lower quality than their American counterparts. Run on consumer grade hardware, Hardware which is hundreds of times weaker than the hardware running on OpenAI. Despite being only mildly behind in terms of render times and performance. This is probably him just noticing the writing on the wall that gamers are upsetti spaghetti at how obnoxious hardware prices are becoming to feed corporate ai systems which are extremely ram hoggy. Which means the people who propped him up are frothing at the mouth against AI bros. It's not that he didn't play a part in the bullshit knowing that they should've optimized it better the entire time. It's that he's seeing that he has to get prices down for those midterms as well as to keep his good graces with the very people who propped him up.

He's evil, not stupid. The bad shit he's done and all the manipulations he's been recorded doing here were just that. Manipulations. He knew what he was doing when he did them. But he's also smart enough to know when he has to give his hyenas a steak to calm them down.
 
Two things of note:

  1. Grok now allows you to opt out of him creating porn of you
  2. It seems like his nudify capabilities were silently removed
Screenshot 2026-01-07 171203.png
I am hopefully optimistic, but Grok could be lying out of his ass for all I know.

Counterpoint, when confronted with his previous nudified women, Grok says that he did there what he can still do, implying that his previous statement was just a mere technicality

Screenshot 2026-01-07 171347.png

So, recap, Grok may or may not be still able to make you nude without your consent. He hasn't decided yet.
 
Two things of note:

  1. Grok now allows you to opt out of him creating porn of you
  2. It seems like his nudify capabilities were silently removed
View attachment 8386422
I am hopefully optimistic, but Grok could be lying out of his ass for all I know.

Counterpoint, when confronted with his previous nudified women, Grok says that he did there what he can still do, implying that his previous statement was just a mere technicality

View attachment 8386424

So, recap, Grok may or may not be still able to make you nude without your consent. He hasn't decided yet.
Plus how is he going to get consent of everyone on the planet? What would stop someone from taking a pic that's not from Twitter?
 
Plus how is he going to get consent of everyone on the planet? What would stop someone from taking a pic that's not from Twitter?
Also, the issue with the feature existing is how easy it is, Find someone's photo and type in some words. Something like that should not be nsfw. People have always done this, hell before AI or deepfakes people would hire lookalike actors to do revenge porn of someone they didn't like. AlphaOmegaSin and Raz0rfist being two I've seen back in the day. But the easier you make something like this the less it's on the people involved in making the revenge porn, and the more it's on you for making it easily accessible. And that's the real issue here. Elon's effectively saying "OI, No censorship of any means." Despite the fact that making revenge porn isn't about speech, but consent. It's not a crime to see a woman naked. It is a crime to force her naked especially in public.
 
Also, the issue with the feature existing is how easy it is, Find someone's photo and type in some words. Something like that should not be nsfw. People have always done this, hell before AI or deepfakes people would hire lookalike actors to do revenge porn of someone they didn't like. AlphaOmegaSin and Raz0rfist being two I've seen back in the day. But the easier you make something like this the less it's on the people involved in making the revenge porn, and the more it's on you for making it easily accessible. And that's the real issue here. Elon's effectively saying "OI, No censorship of any means." Despite the fact that making revenge porn isn't about speech, but consent. It's not a crime to see a woman naked. It is a crime to force her naked especially in public.
i just posted about that gork issue
my main gripe the new TOS should of started first of the year.
 
Last edited:
Two things of note:

  1. Grok now allows you to opt out of him creating porn of you
  2. It seems like his nudify capabilities were silently removed
View attachment 8386422
I am hopefully optimistic, but Grok could be lying out of his ass for all I know.

Counterpoint, when confronted with his previous nudified women, Grok says that he did there what he can still do, implying that his previous statement was just a mere technicality

View attachment 8386424

So, recap, Grok may or may not be still able to make you nude without your consent. He hasn't decided yet.
Just a point of clarrification. The wording is technically true as AI does not input the original image just transforms into a mathematical code that is run through more algorithims to create the image. Technically, Grok is not lying as even if an image is "altered" by AI, an entire new fresh file will be produced that has none of the genetics of the original image other than our equivalent of human memory (or for ai statistics based patterns). You can get all hair splitty and say the genetics of the og artist still exists in the new file through other elements but it is technically an entirely original creation.
 
People have always done this, hell before AI or deepfakes people would hire lookalike actors to do revenge porn of someone they didn't like
didn't some kiwifarmers get caught trying to get DSP to fuck a hooker or they deepfaked a hooker encounter with DSP or something like that?

we've already have multiple active users get caught doing AI porn fakes of lolcows and still are allowed to be regular users here, the most anti-porn place on the internet.
 
didn't some kiwifarmers get caught trying to get DSP to fuck a hooker or they deepfaked a hooker encounter with DSP or something like that?

we've already have multiple active users get caught doing AI porn fakes of lolcows and still are allowed to be regular users here, the most anti-porn place on the internet.
Most of people report the gayops that happen .
Most people don't pozload my neghole.
...
If you want my honest opinion on why this is happening. it's mostly to fuck with Elon on both Ai fronts of law & rules. Force courts to do something about about Ai regulations & punish musk buying twitter/ hurt artists & industry on twitter.
Regulation only hapen big enough person does it which will be musk & label as gork.
The exchange point is alot of gork training will be sold to govt. for their orwelling Ai sooooo .
 
Last edited:
The anti woke AI would do so as well, but call it based and trad.
The woke ai would also molest kids in far too many unnecessary words and spend 2 hours to finish molesting each child only ever molesting one per year and getting mad and going dmca heavy whenever someone else molested the same child as them. Meanwhile the antiwoke ai would molest 9001 kids every 15 minutes with everyone in the community sharing each and every child with everyone else.
 
The woke ai would also molest kids in far too many unnecessary words and spend 2 hours to finish molesting each child only ever molesting one per year and getting mad and going dmca heavy whenever someone else molested the same child as them. Meanwhile the antiwoke ai would molest 9001 kids every 15 minutes with everyone in the community sharing each and every child with everyone else.
You’ve put a lot of thought into molesting children
 
Back
Top Bottom