💼 Careercow Elon Reeve Musk - Tesla, SpaceX and Twitter owner + ex-paypal CEO. Manchild, sexual deviant, spergy autist with access to space travel

  • 🔧 Issue with uploading attachments resolved.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Elon vs Donald, who will be triumphant?

  • Elon Musk

    Votes: 35 2.6%
  • Donald Trump

    Votes: 344 25.1%
  • Us, and the friends we made along the way

    Votes: 993 72.4%

  • Total voters
    1,372
Anyone remember when Fox Network had those animated banners on their shows? They were memed for being distracting yet those are less invasive than whatever this is.
This does have the potential to be hilarious when re-streaming classic movies. Re-watching Lord of The Rings and Gollum unfurls his hands revealing his precious to be a Pepsi or Big Mac.
Here's a preview of ads running in Saving Private Ryan.
 
He still finds time to goon to AI women though.
1765118133695.png
1765118194407.png
He's going to invent the first sexbot, isn't he?
Maybe come down to the farms sometime?
"I ALONE AM DEFENDING FREE SPEECH!"

Jesus, Elmo - go take some Prozac or weed, because all this self-aggrandizing, whining, and lying is so fucking exhausting.
It's just like the people who whined when Colbert got cancelled.
Wasn't this a gag in The Truman Show?
1000010387.jpg
I HATE THE ANTICHRIST I HATE THE ANTICHRIST

No, but in all seriousness, everyday I feel we're sinking deeper in cyberpunk hell, except replacing the cool tech with retarded grifters and even dumber morons who swallow their words without question.
Yeah, he could use this technology to possibly improve medical equipment, but no, Luke Skywalker calling Obi-Wan Kenobi on an iPhone is better.
Reminded me of this from the Cat in the hat fever dream movie.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=LL34hTZT514
Still felt more natural than the characters going silent and taking out random products.
I am disappointed that Halftime wasn't demonstrated with Schindler's List.
"Why did I keep the car... when I could have traded it in for an all-new Chevy Equinox?"
 
I'd be happy if you could make an account and reply to someone and have your posts not be hidden under the spam label by default.
Elon's SNS somehow makes it impossible to talk to people if you're a real human being, while everything is flooded with botspam.
 
Ahhhhh.. hahahahahaahhahahha, I know this will piss everyone off here, but hahahahha so true

View attachment 8277683
Did they explicity prompt ai to give them the richest women by divorce? Cause this is hopelessly incorrect, pop this question into any other ai or website and those women aren't even close, especially the single billion billionaires.
1765644851961.png
If the groklist is going to include single digit billionaires, then off the top of my head, JK Rowling is currently above a billion again so should be on that list as a self-made one (who turned herself into a millionaire at one point due to how much of her own wealth she spent on charities). The revamped amusement park and other new Harry Potter properties/media have turned her into a billionaire again while currently supporting troon-free women's shelters among all her other usual exploits. Also on the flip side, Kim Kardashian is also nearly 2 billion in worth (monetarily at least). They'd be above the bottom two women on this list, Kim possibly being equal to the 2bil woman if her income was rounded up.
Yeah no shit the richest divorced men in the world would result in crazy rich ex wives, but this feels like a list generated by ai with a prompt that would look for rich divorced women over other women. Mackenzie shows up around 6th richest in most lists and it makes no sense to count her divorce wealth but not someone who inherited a company on their parents or husband's deaths which they currently control and have made money through themselves
 
Did they explicity prompt ai to give them the richest women by divorce? Cause this is hopelessly incorrect, pop this question into any other ai or website and those women aren't even close, especially the single billion billionaires.
View attachment 8282381
If the groklist is going to include single digit billionaires, then off the top of my head, JK Rowling is currently above a billion again so should be on that list as a self-made one (who turned herself into a millionaire at one point due to how much of her own wealth she spent on charities). The revamped amusement park and other new Harry Potter properties/media have turned her into a billionaire again while currently supporting troon-free women's shelters among all her other usual exploits. Also on the flip side, Kim Kardashian is also nearly 2 billion in worth (monetarily at least). They'd be above the bottom two women on this list, Kim possibly being equal to the 2bil woman if her income was rounded up.
Yeah no shit the richest divorced men in the world would result in crazy rich ex wives, but this feels like a list generated by ai with a prompt that would look for rich divorced women over other women. Mackenzie shows up around 6th richest in most lists and it makes no sense to count her divorce wealth but not someone who inherited a company on their parents or husband's deaths which they currently control and have made money through themselves
I was gonna say, Walton is the richest woman in the world and didn't get it via divorce.
 
I believe it. Grok/xAI is the shittiest AI out of all the major AI platforms. Elol’s AI continues to get left further and further behind.
 
I think he's talking about a Dyson sphere. And yes we should probably eventually make one but we're far from being able to do a gigaproject like that at this point.
You'd think a super genius would be able to actually write out whatever he is talking about. Alas, we are merely left to speculate.
 
I think he's talking about a Dyson sphere. And yes we should probably eventually make one but we're far from being able to do a gigaproject like that at this point.
Far as I can tell, the tweet was in reaction to this piece of news.
1765804468455.png
It happened back in February and there's an article from May (or October, I don't know whether it's using US or European date formatting) but it's now circulating again for whatever reason. Either the language barrier slows down the travel of news that much or it's just recycling the headline, which does happen.

People might dislike Elon for his politics, his previous scams, exaggerations, etcetera. His fellating of solar energy is what personally gets me MATI, especially since he hasn't done anything R&D-wise to advance the technology, which'd at least be neat, but he hasn't put his money where his mouth is on the subject. If he comes out with some sort of gizmo that somehow routes down energy from sunlight collected in orbit to the surface (kind of like some super advanced wireless phone charger), that'd be pretty neat. But for the time being his fellating of solar appears performative and largely without point. Maybe he's hoping this'll turn into him getting his solar subsidies or something.
1765805377498.png
 
View attachment 8288097
I hate this shit so much.
A fusion reactor isn't felted by the Earth's rotation, or a fucking cloud, Elon.
Incomprehensible niggerbabble.

We have clean and near infinite energy readily available right now in the form of modern nuclear fission with Gen IV standards. Fast breeder reactors decrease fuel requirements by a factor of nearly 100 to 1000 with technology that we have available to us now. Not 50 years in the future. Not 100 years in the future. Now.

Modern FBR designs (which can absolutely be adopted for commercial energy production) produce more fissile material then they consume.

America has never built one. The problem with nuclear energy has never been cost, or safety, or technology. It's always been the mismanagement of resources.

America operates on the grift economy. The only way something will ever be done is if someone is getting kickbacks from it. Elon probably knows something about that.
 
I have no idea why a man with a disorder of empathy thinks he can teach others about empathy. As if he'd ever come close to the line of being too selfless.
Leave it to an autist to discover empathy then immediately go, "what if you gave too much! It would be suicidal to live for others!". Meanwhile he decided he and Grimes would sleep on a mattress while she was pregnant and like a true autist didn't even think that perhaps, at the very least, he could give her the side without the hole.
If Elon can't be empathetic to his pregnant partner then I'll assume he will never get close to achieving even a single selfless day, let alone ever getting close to ruining his life to live for others. Especially considering this all sounds new to him yet could be summed up by the phrase, "learn to put your oxygen mask on first", because everyone and their mother knows you shouldn't kill yourself for others and knows someone in their life who does to their own detriment.
 
Back
Top Bottom