Law Elizabeth Holmes Found Guilty on Four Counts - On Monday, a jury found Ms. Holmes guilty on four of 11 counts of wire fraud or conspiracy to commit wire fraud.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1641256912981.png


Elizabeth Holmes was accused of intentionally deceiving patients and investors about the capabilities of her blood-testing startup Theranos Inc., which promised to revolutionize healthcare by using just a few drops of blood from a finger prick to test for a wide range of health conditions. Instead, prosecutors alleged, the company’s proprietary technology was faulty and Theranos hid that it used commercial devices for most of its tests.

On Monday, a jury found Ms. Holmes guilty on four of 11 counts of wire fraud or conspiracy to commit wire fraud. Each count carries a maximum prison sentence of 20 years. Here are the counts and the jury's verdict.

1. Conspiracy to commit wire fraud against Theranos investors: Guilty

2. Conspiracy to commit wire fraud against Theranos paying patients: Not guilty

3. Wire fraud against Theranos investors: wire transfer of $99,990 from Alan Jay Eisenman: No verdict

4. Wire fraud against Theranos investors: wire transfer of $5,349,900 from Black Diamond Ventures: No verdict

5. Wire fraud against Theranos investors: wire transfer of $4,875,000 from Hall Phoenix Inwood Ltd.: No verdict

6. Wire fraud against Theranos investors: wire transfer of $38,336,632 from PFM Healthcare Master Fund: Guilty

7. Wire fraud against Theranos investors: wire transfer of $99,999,984 from Lakeshore Capital Management LP: Guilty

8. Wire fraud against Theranos investors: wire transfer of $5,999,997 from Mosley Family Holdings LLC: Guilty

9. Prosecutors dropped this count in November, after making an error that put the count in peril.

10. Wire fraud against Theranos paying patients: wire transmission of patient E.T.’s blood-test results: Not guilty

11. Wire fraud against Theranos paying patients: wire transmission of patient M.E.’s blood-test results: Not guilty

12. Wire fraud against Theranos paying patients: wire transfer of $1,126,661 used to purchase advertisements for Theranos Wellness Centers: Not guilty

The guilty verdicts against Elizabeth Holmes mean the Theranos founder could be going to prison for years.

Sentencing is a complex and time-consuming process, and many steps still stand between Ms. Holmes and any potential prison time.

She likely will be allowed to stay free on bail until her sentencing, which could take place six months or more from now, sentencing experts said.

The first step is having a probation officer look through the facts of the case and put together a detailed pre-sentence report. This has to be provided to each side at least 45 days ahead of the sentencing hearing.

The report will analyze what sentence seems appropriate under nonbinding federal guidelines, which include factors such as criminal history, the amount of money lost, whether someone was a leader or low-level participant in a crime and whether any special skills were used to commit the crime. "It gets really complicated in a hurry," said Douglas Berman, a professor at The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law who wrote a casebook on sentencing law.

Ms. Holmes's lawyers and the government can then push back on that report, filing their own interpretations of the guidelines and what sentences they think Ms. Holmes deserves.

There is no mandatory minimum sentence for the conspiracy and wire fraud counts she was convicted of, and each count carries a maximum of 20 years. In some cases, like the 150-year sentence given to Ponzi scheme operator Bernie Madoff, the maximum for each count is stacked. In most fraud cases, stacking isn't the norm, Mr. Berman and others familiar with sentencing said.

The final decision rests with U.S. District Judge Edward Davila, who oversaw Ms. Holmes's trial. Judges are guided to hand down a sentence that is "sufficient but not greater than necessary to achieve the purposes of punishment," Mr. Berman said.

From there, Ms. Holmes can request to stay out on bail pending an appeal of her conviction. If a sentence is relatively short, like two years or less, defense lawyers can often succeed in keeping white-collar defendants out of jail during an appeal, Mr. Berman said. For longer sentences, he said, the argument is much harder to make.


 
The voice is fake, and I'd bet money she didn't use the tranny affect during the trial (if she spoke at all.)
She testified, and yes--she used "the voice".
If she gets more than 5 years probation I'll be shocked.
It's a shame she won't do time
That hole won't get any jail time
This is Federal Court; the sentence is the sentence, with 15% off for good behavior being standard and the last year being served at a halfway house. You guys need to learn how the legal system works before you run your mouths. Judges do not have discretion in the Federal system; they score you based on an established matrix, take off 15% if you haven't been a dick, and take into account any deals you've made with the government. That's it.

Each of these counts have a max of 20 years, but they'll all run concurrently. She maxes out the dollar amount on the sentencing scorecard, which will be substantial...best guess is 12-15 years, I'd think. She may be able to knock a couple years off, if the government wants her to testify against Balwani. She's going to Club Fed though, which is more like a dorm room you aren't allowed to leave. Could even be the same prison Martha Stuart went to.
They can retry her on those charges if they want to.
They won't. She's already maxed out on dollar amount and number of victims for sentencing; more convictions won't add more time. They may try to use it as a chip to enhance her sentence though.
She conveniently had a baby this past July, of course she will get less time .
Federal judges do not look kindly on this kind of tactic. If her lawyer has the balls to argue this during the sentencing hearing, it will not go well for her.
 
most dumb blonde bitches just get airtight by the local basketball team to get back at daddy not spread for a fucking 40yo paki sex pest who says yes to every idea the dolt has & opens the chequebook.
the insanity of this whole scenario is mind boggling to me.
 
The voice is fake, and I'd bet money she didn't use the tranny affect during the trial (if she spoke at all.)

What does "no verdict" mean in practical terms?
She went so far to become the female version of Steve Jobs, literally. From dressing like him to having the same voice patterns.
She cost various investors and venture capitalists over $600 million dollars

It was fraud on a grand scale and all she was tagged for was some pathetic wire fraud charges.

People died because her "wonder" machine was complete fake she knew it. She and her cohorts did everything possible to cover up and hide this fact all the while using her political contacts to push hospitals into buying contracts with Theranos for patient testing. Thy were 100% aware the data they were giving back to hospitals wasn't 100% accurate but they sent it anyway to cover up for the fact their wonder machine was full of shit and didn't work.

Selling false information to hospitals she should have been charged with manslaughter really.

But the bitch is rich, well connected and duped just about everyone so the big wigs want it all swept away and forgotten of course. Another huge win for progressism right? Don't question impossible claims if they come from a woman right? Just listen, believe and fork over that cash.
Her device didn’t even make sense from the get-go. How can a PC-sized device be able to detect all these illnesses/conditions just by pricking your finger and getting a sample of someone’s blood?
 
musk at least actually delivers the bullshit he promises
whether anybody actually needs his stupid underground tunnel projects (especially for their hefty pricetag) is a different question, but that's ultimately the customers/investors decision
He delivers just enough to weasel away when his big dreams don't deliver or underdeliver.

He promised the Hyperloop by 2020, all he ever did was weld a couple hundred yards of sewer pipe together and built a mockup of the " capsule" which technophile reporters were shown but not allowed inside.

$50 says its hollow.

But that's enough real sizzle to blame the lack of promised steak on unforeseen kitchen problems instead of the hyper steak 2000 being impossible to cook.

You can sue him for losses but he scraped together just enough chained proteins to avoid out and out fraud.
 
She's an evil sociopath who literally has no human feelings. How else do you explain someone running a medical lab testing company whose results are used to make life-altering clinical decisions the same way you'd run a vaporware scam? She absolutely has blood on her hands and she never once showed any genuine remorse for it.

I knew it was a scam before the whole thing fell apart, as should anyone else with cursory knowledge in the area. The original Carryrou article confirmed it, and his book on the company was mind-blowing. She ran the luckiest confidence scam in the history of confidence scams. She was tangentially connected to important people just enough that she could get the next domino to fall, over and over, gaining momentum each time. There was no way in hell the tech was real. That should have been crystal clear when the chief technologist of the company committed suicide after watching the lie spin completely out of control and realizing nothing was going to pump the brakes on her sociopathy.

That said, she'll never get the kind of sentence she deserves for what she did. And don't listen for a second to her bullshit about her partner being the "real bad guy". He was his own brand of evil, but was 100% operating on her whim. She called all the shots, she has delusions of self-grandeur that would make Steve Jobs and Bill Gates blush, and she deserves the business end of a rope but will get a too-short stay at Club Fed instead.
 
Last edited:
People overlook this about her. The main indiciduals she conned were people like Bill Clinton and General Mattis, old guys with weird sex fetishes. Guys who were drawn in by the idea of a female Steve Jobs, and blowjobs probably.

She played all the angles. The old fashioned chivalry from social conservatives. The sexual desire of men. The instinctual protectiveness normies have for women and mothers. The dogma of woke liberals. She's smart...okay maybe not that smart or she would have gotten things to work out but still she shows an uncanny dsp like detachment from morals and ideology that gives them a clearer understanding of how the world works in some ways.
 
Not to sound smart; to sound less feminine/more masculine. (Take that as you will.)
She knows that no-one in business will listen to a young woman with a voice like a cartoon squirrel. By making her voice more androgynous she subtly confuses men and can get past their distrust of her youth and sex.
It's quite a clever ploy. Completely sociopathic of course, but clever.
I wonder where she learnt it?
Funny...one of the disk jockeys on a local radio station is a very young woman. She sounds about twelve years old. Sometimes I feel like contacting the station and asking if this young woman's parents know what she's doing.
 
She went so far to become the female version of Steve Jobs, literally. From dressing like him to having the same voice patterns.

Her device didn’t even make sense from the get-go. How can a PC-sized device be able to detect all these illnesses/conditions just by pricking your finger and getting a sample of someone’s blood?
Don't believe it can be done now either, maybe in 10-20 years.
 
She should be put away for 25+.

However, being a woman and it being white collar crime, it'll probably be 4-5 years probation. I'd be shocked if she got any long term prison time. (Maybe a year, at most.)

In a just world she would be near bankrupt the rest of her life, but her parents are wealthy and well connected. She'll live off stipends from them and use whatever connections she has left to find work again.
 
People overlook this about her. The main indiciduals she conned were people like Bill Clinton and General Mattis, old guys with weird sex fetishes. Guys who were drawn in by the idea of a female Steve Jobs, and blowjobs probably.
She also got the CEO of Safeway, Steve Burd, who appears to be some sort of Neocon type and basically ran the company straight into the ground with centralized buying and some ill-fated acquisitions (the company was sold to Albertsons in 2015). Burd claimed that the company did "100 hours of due diligence" and ended up losing some $370 million in undelivered tests (though Holmes' lawyers claimed that included store remodeling costs and thus should be excluded from trial).
 
From what one of the lawtubers said, apparently the sentencing guidelines when you do all the math and add in the aggravating factors suggest life without parole because the sheer amount of shekels she swindled and people she fucked over with wrong testing, the tech mislead hundreds of thousands of people.
Sadly the max for the guilty counts if served consecutively is only 65 years and she will most likely get nowhere near that.
 
She played all the angles. The old fashioned chivalry from social conservatives. The sexual desire of men. The instinctual protectiveness normies have for women and mothers. The dogma of woke liberals. She's smart...okay maybe not that smart or she would have gotten things to work out but still she shows an uncanny dsp like detachment from morals and ideology that gives them a clearer understanding of how the world works in some ways.
A conman (well, con woman in this case) doesn't have to be smart, they just have to learn how to manipulate people. It's not just being the mark being gullible or being enslaved to a woman the moment she bats her eyes at you, it's learning how to play into emotions and human nature. There are dozens of vectors that they use, whether by greed, fear, honesty, dishonesty, trustworthiness, desperation, ideals, et cetera. Homeless people and Indian phone scammers do the same thing, though usually not on a grander scale.

She must have known on some level that the house of cards was going to collapse at some point, that her products were junk, that investors and the world were going to find out. Why she didn't book a first class flight out to some tropical island with no extradition treaties back five years ago is a mystery we'll never know.
 
She must have known on some level that the house of cards was going to collapse at some point, that her products were junk, that investors and the world were going to find out. Why she didn't book a first class flight out to some tropical island with no extradition treaties back five years ago is a mystery we'll never know.
Probably had the gambler’s confidence, like Maddoff. The sort of thing where they know it could collapse, but they might also win big one more time. Plus ego, she didn’t want to run away and look scummy and sleazy, she still wanted to cling to the image of someone who has been wronged, poor me, all these men lied to me.
 
Back
Top Bottom