EDF ; Encylopedia Dramatica Farms

  • Thread starter Thread starter HG 400
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Sugar said:
Hi there, did you guys see that we reworked your article for you?
OC please don't steal
Click to expand...

The overall structure is better now, and I like the cap of the whole Sonic Rainboom thing. There's very little flesh on the bones however, and here's some suggestions that might improve the humour value of the article :
1. If you're going to call the forum worse than the lolcows they discuss , it helps to have some concrete examples. For example, you could take some choice screencaps from "Halal" Lolcows' threads because those people used to be our members before we got tired of their bullshit. For example Wizzrobe, GeorgeSheardexpress9 and Connor Bible are good examples of "lolcows" that are closer to the typical Kiwi that we'd like to admit.
2. Include examples of meta slapfights. Well, the stuff on Null has some of those covered but I think that the most laughable part of the Kiwi is how damn seriously some people take disagreements on how a forum dedicated to discussing pants-shitting autistics should be run and some people see the following of Lolcows as like some weird autistic spy thriller where people act important for having "double agents" within our site.
3. The user pics you have of our users in your article - I'd say it'd be worthwhile to actually not include the good looking people because you're making us look more normal if you do. "This person's ugly, ha ha!" doesn't cut it if they look normal or can be said to look nice/decent.
4. The subforum summaries are nice, but I think they could do with highlighting spergy/cringy behaviour from those subforums or go over the general subforum culture briefly.

Sugar said:
I was working off of not knowing anything about KF other than what a single day's perusal would show
Click to expand...
I didn't say it was a poor show, just giving tips what themes you could be playing off of.
 
Last edited:
Clown Doll said:
The overall structure is better now, and I like the cap of the whole Sonic Rainboom thing. There's very little flesh on the bones however, and here's some suggestions that might improve the humour value of the article :
1. If you're going to call the forum worse than the lolcows they discuss , it helps to have some concrete examples. For example, you could take some choice screencaps from "Halal" Lolcows' threads because those people used to be our members before we got tired of their bullshit. For example Wizzrobe and Connor Bible are good examples of "lolcows" that are closer to the typical Kiwi that we'd like to admit.
2. Include examples of meta slapfights. Well, the stuff on Null has some of those covered but I think that the most laughable part of the Kiwi is how damn seriously some people take disagreements on how a forum dedicated to discussing pants-shitting autistics should be run and some people see the following of Lolcows as like some weird autistic spy thriller where people act important for having "double agents" within our site.
3. The user pics you have of our users in your article - I'd say it'd be worthwhile to actually not include the good looking people because you're making us look more normal if you do. "This person's ugly, ha ha!" doesn't cut it if they look normal or can be said to look nice/decent.
Click to expand...


Also, for number one, anything really in the incel/loveshy subforum works as well. In fact, that place is great in terms of content and idiocy.
 
Clown Doll said:
The overall structure is better now, and I like the cap of the whole Sonic Rainboom thing. There's very little flesh on the bones however, and here's some suggestions that might improve the humour value of the article :
1. If you're going to call the forum worse than the lolcows they discuss , it helps to have some concrete examples. For example, you could take some choice screencaps from "Halal" Lolcows' threads because those people used to be our members before we got tired of their bullshit. For example Wizzrobe and Connor Bible are good examples of "lolcows" that are closer to the typical Kiwi that we'd like to admit.
2. Include examples of meta slapfights. Well, the stuff on Null has some of those covered but I think that the most laughable part of the Kiwi is how damn seriously some people take disagreements on how a forum dedicated to discussing pants-shitting autistics should be run and some people see the following of Lolcows as like some weird autistic spy thriller where people act important for having "double agents" within our site.
3. The user pics you have of our users in your article - I'd say it'd be worthwhile to actually not include the good looking people because you're making us look more normal if you do. "This person's ugly, ha ha!" doesn't cut it if they look normal or can be said to look nice/decent.
Click to expand...
I was working off of not knowing anything about KF other than what a single day's perusal would show
Feel free to make an account and edit the article

Also, what good looking people
 
Sugar said:
I was working off of not knowing anything about KF other than what a single day's perusal would show
Feel free to make an account and edit the article

Also, what good looking people
Click to expand...

I'm sorry, but Strewth is alright looking. A little bit too photogentic for the article, but that's just a personal preference.
 
bearycool said:
Also, for number one, anything really in the incel/loveshy subforum works as well. In fact, that place is great in terms of content and idiocy.
Click to expand...
Community Watch prior to Cartoon Fandoms threads being culled was also an embarrassment. The fandoms threads were moved to Spergatory and even in their sanitized state might contain some nuggets of trollshielding gold.

bearycool said:
I'm sorry, but Strewth is alright looking. A little bit too photogentic for the article, but that's just a personal preference.
Click to expand...
Also, if you're highlighing a user, an account of alleged sperginess/lulzy trait would be more fun than simply posting their picture and pointing a finger that they're ugly or piping into an existing ED article.
 
Sugar said:
After looking at the gallery, I can say that everyone is there for a reason
Whether KF's reasons might be lower, per se than EDFs is probably the question here
Click to expand...

Oh okay, they must have done something I'm not aware of. I know just some who were epic in terms of drama. I guess just state what they did in a brief sentence?
 
bearycool said:
Oh okay, they must have done something I'm not aware of. I know just some who were epic in terms of drama. I guess just state what they did in a brief sentence?
Click to expand...
I was saying that KF's standards are lower than EDF's standards
All those people are ugly af

Just because a skinny guy can grow a beard doesn't make him attractive
It's like ugly teenagers who grow their hair long and skateboard in order to hide their genetic failure
 
Sugar said:
I was saying that KF's standards are lower than EDF's standards
All those people are ugly af

Just because a skinny guy can grow a beard doesn't make him attractive
It's like ugly teenagers who grow their hair long and skateboard in order to hide their genetic failure
Click to expand...

Never change Sugar Bombs <3

or actually, ED in general.

I might get off my ass and see if I can fix stuff. Have any ssuggestions?
 
Sugar said:
If ED were a hugbox, everyone would die from all the gay sex
Just trying to prevent a massacre
Click to expand...

I agree. no more gay.

Also, if I get off my gay ass I'll edit some of it. Any suggestions that you think are poigant?
 
bearycool said:
I might get off my ass and see if I can fix stuff. Have any ssuggestions?
Click to expand...
You would know better than I would, this is a new place for me and I'm not even sure if it's safe
#mildtrigger

I'd say add in what specifics you'd like about the incel subforum stuff and I'll edit and pipe it for you.

Clown Doll said:
Also, if you're highlighing a user, an account of alleged sperginess/lulzy trait would be more fun than simply posting their picture and pointing a finger that they're ugly or piping into an existing ED article.
Click to expand...
We like the easy wins
 
Clown Doll said:
3. The user pics you have of our users in your article - I'd say it'd be worthwhile to actually not include the good looking people because you're making us look more normal if you do. "This person's ugly, ha ha!" doesn't cut it if they look normal or can be said to look nice/decent.
Click to expand...
:story: :story: damn nigga im not even out of bed yet and you've already made my day
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom