BrokeACKMountain
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2019
With some time to look at the supporting documents, here's a followup to my previous:
July 2019 he filed his expenses as $9,086.95 (almost double the average he's filed for in other months - his average expenses not including 07/2019 was $4603.32). Now because of this large spike, his monthly "average" expenses over the past 6 months were $5243.84 - the spike putting his average expenses up by $640.52, which essentially means his net income is $3990.69 (despite him averaging $9234.53 per month gross).
I'm going to press F to doubt he really has $4603.32 worth of business expenditure per month, and going to press F again when it comes to the spike.
As per Q10 Part1 of the monthly income and expenses statement he's filed, his household income is far lower than I'd expect it to be ($3990/Month net income for Phil + $1742/Month (no partner expenses) for Kat = $5733/Month household income). Multiply up by 12 for yearly income as per Q12b Part2 and the household "earns" $68796 PA, putting him and Kat under the median income for WA state by $10026.88.
If we were to remove the spike in July, and average the rest of the months out, the calculations show that he's very close to being above the average income. Something, I believe, may allow the courts to scrutinize further.
Average income (Phil) = $9234.53
Average expenses (minus July) = $4603.32
Net (Phil) = $4,631.21
Net (Phil) $4,631.21 + Net (Kat) $1742.32 = Net (Household) $6373.53
Multiply up as per Part2 (12b) = $6373.53 * 12 = $76,482.36
This puts the yearly household income within $2340.64 of the WA median ($195.33/Month - something one paypig could easily sway).
Question: Can anyone think of a reason for why his expenses for July 2019 were so high? Surely if he had such high operating costs in July, there would of been some major begathons etc. My understanding is that the expenses should be fairly consistent throughout the months, unless he somehow had even higher credit card debt until the summer.
July 2019 he filed his expenses as $9,086.95 (almost double the average he's filed for in other months - his average expenses not including 07/2019 was $4603.32). Now because of this large spike, his monthly "average" expenses over the past 6 months were $5243.84 - the spike putting his average expenses up by $640.52, which essentially means his net income is $3990.69 (despite him averaging $9234.53 per month gross).
I'm going to press F to doubt he really has $4603.32 worth of business expenditure per month, and going to press F again when it comes to the spike.
As per Q10 Part1 of the monthly income and expenses statement he's filed, his household income is far lower than I'd expect it to be ($3990/Month net income for Phil + $1742/Month (no partner expenses) for Kat = $5733/Month household income). Multiply up by 12 for yearly income as per Q12b Part2 and the household "earns" $68796 PA, putting him and Kat under the median income for WA state by $10026.88.
If we were to remove the spike in July, and average the rest of the months out, the calculations show that he's very close to being above the average income. Something, I believe, may allow the courts to scrutinize further.
Average income (Phil) = $9234.53
Average expenses (minus July) = $4603.32
Net (Phil) = $4,631.21
Net (Phil) $4,631.21 + Net (Kat) $1742.32 = Net (Household) $6373.53
Multiply up as per Part2 (12b) = $6373.53 * 12 = $76,482.36
This puts the yearly household income within $2340.64 of the WA median ($195.33/Month - something one paypig could easily sway).
Question: Can anyone think of a reason for why his expenses for July 2019 were so high? Surely if he had such high operating costs in July, there would of been some major begathons etc. My understanding is that the expenses should be fairly consistent throughout the months, unless he somehow had even higher credit card debt until the summer.
Last edited: