🐱 Dr. Seuss is racist now

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
CatParty


  • Loudoun schools spokesman Wayde B. Byard confirmed to The Washington Post that they have 'shifted the emphasis' of March 2 Read Across America day
  • That means the day will not celebrate the much loved Seuss stories 'exclusively'
  • 'Research in recent years has revealed strong racial undertones,' Byard said
  • That came following a 2019 report called 'The Cat is Out of the Bag: Orientalism, Anti-Blackness, and White Supremacy in Dr. Seuss's Children's Books'
  • Read Across America Day had traditionally focused on Seuss books
  • But since 2017 the focus has shifted to 'Celebrating a Nation of Diverse Readers'
  • Learning for Justice is behind the calls to cancel Dr Seuss, Fox News reports
A Virginia school system has dropped Dr. Seuss from an annual event to encourage reading as district leaders accused the beloved author's books having 'strong racial undertones.'

The Loudon County schools will shift the 'emphasis' of the annual Read Across America day on March 2 away from Seuss and toward books more 'inclusive and diverse and reflective of our student community,' a spokesman said.

Seuss, whose real name is Theodor Geisel, had been the face of the annual Read Across America day for more than 20 years. A report has accused his children's stories of featuring 'orientalism, anti-blackness and white supremacy'.

Loudoun schools spokesman Wayde B. Byard, said recent research had revealed 'strong racial undertones in many books written/illustrated by Dr. Seuss,' The Washington Post reported.

'Given this research, and LCPS' focus on equity and culturally responsive instruction, LCPS has provided guidance to schools in the past couple of years to not connect Read Across America Day with Dr. Seuss' birthday exclusively,' Byard said.

DailyMail.com has asked Loudon schools for comment.

Byard insisted that the books had not been banned outright - and that students could still access Seuss in the district's libraries and classrooms, but that the March 2 event would not 'simply celebrate Dr. Seuss.'

His comments come following a 2019 report called 'The Cat is Out of the Bag: Orientalism, Anti-Blackness, and White Supremacy in Dr. Seuss's Children's Books'.


That report states: 'White supremacy is seen through the centering of Whiteness and White characters, who comprise 98% (2,195 characters) of all characters.

'Notably, every character of color is male. Males of color are only presented in subservient, exotified, or dehumanized roles. This also remains true in their relation to White characters.

'Most startling is the complete invisibility and absence of women and girls of color across Seuss' entire children’s book collection.

'In addition, some of Dr. Seuss' most iconic books feature animal or non-human characters that transmit Orientalist, anti-Black, and White supremacist messaging through allegories and symbolism.'


Read Across America Day had traditionally featured on Seuss books including classics like The Cat In The Hat and The Grinch.

But since 2017 the National Education Association has shifted its focus nationally to 'Celebrating a Nation of Diverse Readers'.

Learning for Justice is behind the recent calls to cancel Dr Seuss, Fox News reports.

Author Geisel has already come under fire for using 'stereotypical Orientalist tropes', according to a report by researchers Katie Ishizuka and Ramón Stephens.

That found 'of the 2,240 (identified) human characters, there are forty-five characters of color representing 2% of the total number of human characters'.

A total of 43 of 'exhibited behaviors and appearances that align with harmful and stereotypical Orientalist tropes', they said.

Meanwhile, other cultural icons are targeted for 'modern' refreshes: On Friday it was reported that Mr. Potato Head had gone gender neutral as toy maker Hasbro announced it is changing the branding of the 70-year-old figure because it needs to break free from gender norms.

The change - which will drop the 'Mr.' from Mr. Potato Head brand - sparked debate on social media, with many saying toy company Hasbro has bent to 'woke' culture by changing a cultural icon that's been on toy shelves since 1952.

But Rhode Island-based Hasbro, which revealed the change in a presentation to investors Thursday, said the gender-neutral name comes as societal roles are changing - with more single-parent households and same-sex parents coming into the picture.

As for Seuss, it's not the first time the late Geisel has found himself in the cultural crosshairs.

In 2019 DailyMail.com reported how Geisel portrayed black people as if they were slaves being sold off at a white-owned department store.

He used the word 'n*****' to refer to African Americans and described women as 'insignificant and helpless', book Becoming Dr. Seuss: Theodor Geisel and the Making of an American Imagination claimed.

Decades later when Geisel was called out on these cartoons he said it was 'just the way things were 50 years ago' and claimed that feminists wanted to 'clean up everything'.

In 2017 Cambridgeport Elementary School librarian Liz Phipps Soeiro rejected a gift of several Dr Seuss books from Melania Trump, saying their whimsical illustrations were 'steeped in racist propaganda, caricatures, and harmful stereotypes'.

The White House had announced that one school in each state would receive a selection of Seuss' books chosen by Melania, including 'Green Eggs and Ham' and 'The Cat in the Hat'.


But Soeiro turned down the collection of almost a dozen books, saying in the open letter her school was award-winning and well-funded.

She continued: 'You may not be aware of this, but Dr Seuss is a bit of a cliché, a tired and worn ambassador for children's literature.'

She added: 'Another fact that many people are unaware of is that Dr Seuss's illustrations are steeped in racist propaganda, caricatures, and harmful stereotypes.

'Open one of his books (If I Ran a Zoo or And to Think That I Saw it On Mulberry Street, for example), and you'll see the racist mockery in his art.'

Neither of those books were included in Melania's selection.
 
So why the fuck has ebay banned selling them too?

Maybe, but I don't think most people are talking only about ebay when they talk about the whole "Dr Seuss is being cancelled!" issue, are they?

Look, once again, and then I'm done, I am NOT saying this is necessarily a good idea. I am merely saying:
1.) I do not, personally, see this as "cancelling" something, because I don't see how one can cancel themselves. Ebay, that's a different story, but as far as the Dr Seuss company itself? THAT is not
2.) I think that, if someone owns the right to something, they should have the right to decide if they want to continue publishing it. That doesn't they SHOULD, but that they should have that right. That is all.
Got that? Surely you don't believe a company should be forced to continue publishing something against their will?


(And yeah, it probably would've been better if they had just let them go out of print quietly, but maybe it was a publicity stunt or something?)
 
Got that? Surely you don't believe a company should be forced to continue publishing something against their will?
My god you type like a retarded twitter user.

You seem to confuse the company with the man himself; I firmly believe in artists rights and a man’s rights to legacy. What they’re doing is in violation of both those things and is result of a toxic culture. That fact that this can be excused because “they own it” is frightening for a multitude of reasons.
And lol at “publishing something against their will”. As if a big media company can somehow be bullied on the internet or people are forcing them to make more books.

The only argument I’ve agreed with you is the part about this being a publicity stunt and that’s only because I said that pages ago.
 
First off, the ones "cancelling" these six books are the Dr Suess company themselves. The very people who hold that right.
First off, why did you lead with a lie by omission of leaving out what happened with Ebay?

Oh right, because you have a history of doing dishonest things like that:

I think there's a wee difference here, no offense. Whatever your feelings on Cooper or Carano, he was comparing Rwanda to an event where a mob rioted and attempted to overtake the capitol building which resulted in the deaths of five people. Carano was comparing the Holocaust to being criticized for her political views. Not quite the same thing. A more apt comparison MIGHT be the McCarthy era, but definitely not Nazi Germany.

People get shit for their political beliefs all the freaking time -- the current climate is nothing new. "This guy eats babies and hangs the toilet paper the wrong way!!!"

Should she have been fired? I don't know, maybe more was going on behind the scenes. Quite honestly, it's probably a PR thing, or they're worried about losing their sponsers. That's usually what it comes down to: $$$$$$$

Dear Lord, how blatant can you get with this pattern?

So why the fuck has ebay banned selling them too?
They're not being honest due to personal ideology. When a culturally center-left organization or individual gets criticized, such as Obama, they periodically fall over themselves half-cocked to defend them when they see an opportunity. Usually it is about this embarrassing and poorly-argued with tangential bothsidesism.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom