🎭 Dramacow Dr. Adrian Harrop - Condescending Junior NHS doc, thin skinned sideshow, Internet defense force for troons and pedos

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh for sure. His mind won't have been changed one bit. In fact, he probably hates women just a little more than he already did because of this, now that a female billionaire has smacked his dumb ass down.
 
I don't think he was comparing the 2 in fairness, just making a rather hamfisted point about being liked by kids not necessarily meaning you are nice to kids, but you live by the sword you die by the sword, tough titties Adrian, how low is your self esteem that you get publically humiliated on the regular and just keep going?

Looks like there's movement on the GMC complaints as well. I still find it unlikely the GMC will do anything to him more than telling him to pipe down on Twitter, but he'll definitely be feeling the heat at the moment.

http://archive.vn/CZy1q

scr.png
 
Oh for sure. His mind won't have been changed one bit. In fact, he probably hates women just a little more than he already did because of this, now that a female billionaire has smacked his dumb ass down.
Even Uncle Tony couldn’t get his spunk filled ass out of this mess.
 
Last edited:
I'm surprised the didn't phrase it like "It was not my intention, Joanne, to equate..."
He loves to use first names when he's chastising women. Fuck I actually hate this guy and am mad at him.
I wonder if any of the terven realise that they can report stories to the UK’s best selling tabloid newspaper via WhatsApp
9A1B80A1-978A-4BCA-B77E-9C48C4A63208.jpeg
 
Apologising for his JK Rowling tweet may have consequences for him in the future.

If he didn't seek legal advice, from an actual solicitor that he properly briefed, then he's an idiot. I'm not just talking about him getting an half hour consultation on the phone with some junior solicitor, who is of course going to tell him to apologise. He needed an experienced solicitor who could take the time to fully understand his profile and the implications for him in the future.

The next time he gets in a twitter spat and starts gobbing off that apology can be used against him. He now has a history of making statements he essentially admits are libelous and later withdrawing them.
 
If he didn't seek legal advice, from an actual solicitor that he properly briefed, then he's an idiot. I'm not just talking about him getting an half hour consultation on the phone with some junior solicitor, who is of course going to tell him to apologise. He needed an experienced solicitor who could take the time to fully understand his profile and the implications for him in the future.
I'm sure he didn't contact any solicitor while he was narc raging on the twatters. Uncle Tony probably told him in DMs, but not in any official capacity. He might have had a talk with a proper solicitor after he cooled down a bit - well, if he did cool down at all. This impulsive faggot has abysmal self-control, he should take some kind of anger management therapy.

I wonder if he was ever examined by a psychiatrist.
 
The next time he gets in a twitter spat and starts gobbing off that apology can be used against him. He now has a history of making statements he essentially admits are libelous and later withdrawing them.

Well, it would be good advice if you were a normie and would go forth, sadder and wiser, and sin no more, but instead, he will find some other woman to harass with his misogynistic bullshit, being careful this time that they are some old widow or something who can't afford a team of solicitors to work him over.
 
Apologising for his JK Rowling tweet may have consequences for him in the future.

If he didn't seek legal advice, from an actual solicitor that he properly briefed, then he's an idiot. I'm not just talking about him getting an half hour consultation on the phone with some junior solicitor, who is of course going to tell him to apologise. He needed an experienced solicitor who could take the time to fully understand his profile and the implications for him in the future.

The next time he gets in a twitter spat and starts gobbing off that apology can be used against him. He now has a history of making statements he essentially admits are libelous and later withdrawing them.
I suspect he’s going to go up the google rankings with this, especially if the press get interested. I have also heard from a very well connected contact that he’s going to be under severe professional stress soon and this unnecessary grandstanding and embarrassing retraction will not help at all.
 
Well, it would be good advice if you were a normie and would go forth, sadder and wiser, and sin no more, but instead, he will find some other woman to harass with his misogynistic bullshit, being careful this time that they are some old widow or something who can't afford a team of solicitors to work him over.

In the UK 'no win no fee' is less common for libel cases, than it is for say personal injury where it's the norm.

However Harrop has assets, and now thanks to his JK Rowling spat, he has a history of making and withdrawing libelous statements. So some old widow may find that a team of solicitors make themselves available to her.

Currently he's going back and forth online with Maya Forstater, about her sacking, which again makes me think he's not gotten proper legal advice. I think he believes by switching from talking about her specific case to hypothetical ones, that he's protecting himself.

MF.png



Anyway even if nothing comes of it, I'm going to be really interested to see where he's employed 6 months from now.
 
Just to clarify two things because I see people mixing them up in the thread:

a "GP" is someone who finished, after being qualified as a doctor, specialist training in what some countries call "family medicine" and others "general pratice" - a "GP" in England is not someone straight out of a medical degree + the "foundation years" (in the UK, two years working under supervision). After the training in family medicine / general practice that lasts 3-4 years, one is called a "General Practitioner" and for instance can diagnose health, they know a little of everything

a "specialist" is someone who after the two "foundation years" went through specialist training in something like cardiology or neurology etc. They know a lot about one thing but very little, in comparison, about the rest

just checked and as from Sept. 2019 he is on the GP register, which is very scary. At least he took a long time longer than normal, six years, but still scary that at the end he managed.

a registered practice doesn't mean, in the UK, actually having his own office and sitting there and having patients. A practice can be registered only for house calls or one can rent a fully equipped office for say 1 hour every two weeks and have the "practice" registered there

a "NHS doctor" can be:

a doctor who just registered with the NHS in order to be able to prescribe, even medicine which is NOT paid for by the NHS, but he still wants to have NHS prescription pads;

or a doctor even working 100% private that still wants to be able to prescribe medicine that the patients don't need to pay for (somehow patients are OK with paying say £100 for a private psychiatric consultation but not OK paying for the pills £10 instead of £2 when after said consultation they get a prescription for something)

a doctor in specialist or GP training, who is trained in a NHS-funded hospital and gets paid by the NHS and his prescriptions, written in the hospital, are NHS-paid-for

When people need weird prescriptions and this crazy doctor is writing them, he can do that. Unfortunately if he just writes 100% private prescriptions with no refunds there is much less checking than NHS paid-for-medicine, even if he's writing hormones etc.

Also people confuse a real, properly qualified GP with a doctor who isn't one because they think the non-qualified doctor is doing "general practice" and most people don't know the difference.

How he's still registered idk, because people get in trouble with the GMC for less. He's walking on thin ice because all it takes is *one* to get from him "online medical advice" and report him. There is a GMC code of ethics and it looks like he's breaking it.

He'll probably fail his revalidation test and will no longer be able to practise. I hope the GMC does something because he really puts doctors in a bad name. But this is the same GMC that gets doctors in trouble for writing iron tablets for their children because one "should not prescribe for family and friends" and wants paediatricians to go to out-of-hours GPs on say Saturday evening to get iron tablets. The GMC is a bag of wonders.

@Buster O'Keefe - the idiot uses first names because that's hospital talk. That's how some referrals are written now ("Jane only slept two hours a day. Jane had a history of being bipolar and the children reported that Jane had been manic for two weeks.) btw the guidelines say "ask people first how they prefer to be called" so I hope one day someone says "doctor, we were not in school, don't be condescending" and hello GMC this one is rude, insulting and unstable

@Real Mutha For Ya : it would be very nice if someone reported him to The Sun and the GMC did something. If you are a doctor, you don't want to have patients thinking you might be someone like him. If you are a patient, you don't want someone like him going around prescribing things. Because say you have no idea and you look for a GP and you tell this one "I feel guilty because I look at KF and can't sleep", this one will say "yes and you should feel guilty, cissing is a crime and you should know that just because you have a dick you are not necessarily a man, here is an antipsychotic, come here twice a week so I can brainwash you" instead of "nothing to feel guilty about, it's normal to find people funny but if you can't sleep perhaps try going to bed and looking at the website in the morning? or is there anything else that worries you"?

Anyway he pisses me off because then proper doctors have to undo the damage he is doing by saying rubbish and they will spend their (finite) time dealing with this.
 
Last edited:
Just to clarify two things because I see people mixing them up in the thread:

a "GP" is someone who finished, after being qualified as a doctor, specialist training in what some countries call "family medicine" and others "general pratice" - a "GP" in England is not someone straight out of a medical degree + the "foundation years" (in the UK, two years working under supervision). After the training in family medicine / general practice that lasts 3-4 years, one is called a "General Practitioner" and for instance can diagnose health, they know a little of everything

a "specialist" is someone who after the two "foundation years" went through specialist training in something like cardiology or neurology etc. They know a lot about one thing but very little, in comparison, about the rest

just checked and as from Sept. 2019 he is on the GP register, which is very scary.

a registered practice doesn't mean, in the UK, actually having his own office and sitting there and having patients. A practice can be registered only for house calls or one can rent a fully equipped office for say 1 hour every two weeks and have the "practice" registered there

a "NHS doctor" can be:

a doctor who just registered with the NHS in order to be able to prescribe, even medicine which is NOT paid for by the NHS, but he still wants to have NHS prescription pads;

or a doctor even working 100% private that still wants to be able to prescribe medicine that the patients don't need to pay for (somehow patients are OK with paying say £100 for a private psychiatric consultation but not OK paying for the pills £10 instead of £2 when after said consultation they get a prescription for something)

a doctor in specialist or GP training, who is trained in a NHS-funded hospital and gets paid by the NHS and his prescriptions, written in the hospital, are NHS-paid-for

When people need weird prescriptions and this crazy doctor is writing them, he can do that. Unfortunately if he just writes 100% private prescriptions with no refunds there is much less checking than NHS paid-for-medicine, even if he's writing hormones etc.

Also people confuse a real, properly qualified GP with a doctor who isn't one because they think the non-qualified doctor is doing "general practice" and most people don't know the difference.

How he's still registered idk, because people get in trouble with the GMC for less. He's walking on thin ice because all it takes is *one* to get from him "online medical advice" and report him. There is a GMC code of ethics and it looks like he's breaking it.

He'll probably fail his revalidation test and will no longer be able to practise. I hope the GMC does something because he really puts doctors in a bad name. But this is the same GMC that gets doctors in trouble for writing iron tablets for their children because one "should not prescribe for family and friends" and wants paediatricians to go to out-of-hours GPs on say Saturday evening to get iron tablets. The GMC is a bag of wonders.

@Buster O'Keefe - the idiot uses first names because that's hospital talk. That's how some referrals are written now ("Jane only slept two hours a day. Jane had a history of being bipolar and the children reported that Jane had been manic for two weeks.) btw the guidelines say "ask people first how they prefer to be called" so I hope one day someone says "doctor, we were not in school, don't be condescending" and hello GMC this one is rude, insulting and unstable

@Real Mutha For Ya : it would be very nice if someone reported him to The Sun and the GMC did something. If you are a doctor, you don't want to have patients thinking you might be someone like him. If you are a patient, you don't want someone like him going around prescribing things. Because say you have no idea and you look for a GP and you tell this one "I feel guilty because I look at KF and can't sleep", this one will say "yes and you should feel guilty, cissing is a crime and you should know that just because you have a dick you are not necessarily a man, here is an antipsychotic, come here twice a week so I can brainwash you" instead of "nothing to feel guilty about, it's normal to find people funny but if you can't sleep perhaps try going to bed and looking at the website in the morning? or is there anything else that worries you"?

Anyway he pisses me off because then proper doctors have to undo the damage he is doing by saying rubbish and they will spend their (finite) time dealing with this.
Again and again in this thread, people have made hopeful statements about the GMC doing something.... they won't, there are far worse Doctors than Harrop currently practicing medicine in the UK. There is no way the GMC is going to set the precedent for disciplining a doctor for something he's tweeted, no matter how retarded.

The re-validation however that's different. He needs to re-validate every 5 years, and my understanding that involves verifying that he was practicing at a sufficient level of competency over the previous 5 year period. The requirements aren't particularly onerous for a GP that's working full time in a large GP practice. One interesting component of this is a statutory role of 'responsible officer' exists, a Doctor with direct contact with the GP who's responsible for overseeing and making recommendations.


My understanding is that larger GP practices would have their own responsible officer. They would also have the admin staff, to verify work done, etc. He's not part of a practice though, he's a locum. (incidentally if someone can comment on how typical it is for a newly qualified GP to immediately start work as a locum rather than join a practice that would be interesting)

It sometimes happens that Doctors move into other professions, the GMC is cautious about the idea of part time doctors. There were issues a few years back with Doctors taking maternity leave, and even though the majority of new GP's are women, the GMC was pretty grudging about making changes.

Anyway I have no idea who Harrop's responsible officer is, but I suspect he'll have a key role to play a few years from now.

Anyway I have a belief he'll stop practicing himself long before he needs to re-validate.
 
Again and again in this thread, people have made hopeful statements about the GMC doing something.... they won't, there are far worse Doctors than Harrop currently practicing medicine in the UK. There is no way the GMC is going to set the precedent for disciplining a doctor for something he's tweeted, no matter how retarded.

The re-validation however that's different. He needs to re-validate every 5 years, and my understanding that involves verifying that he was practicing at a sufficient level of competency over the previous 5 year period. The requirements aren't particularly onerous for a GP that's working full time in a large GP practice. One interesting component of this is a statutory role of 'responsible officer' exists, a Doctor with direct contact with the GP who's responsible for overseeing and making recommendations.


My understanding is that larger GP practices would have their own responsible officer. They would also have the admin staff, to verify work done, etc. He's not part of a practice though, he's a locum. (incidentally if someone can comment on how typical it is for a newly qualified GP to immediately start work as a locum rather than join a practice that would be interesting)

It sometimes happens that Doctors move into other professions, the GMC is cautious about the idea of part time doctors. There were issues a few years back with Doctors taking maternity leave, and even though the majority of new GP's are women, the GMC was pretty grudging about making changes.

Anyway I have no idea who Harrop's responsible officer is, but I suspect he'll have a key role to play a few years from now.

Anyway I have a belief he'll stop practicing himself long before he needs to re-validate.

I agree, the GMC probably won't do much unless a patient complains or another doctor is worried about patient safety and then also I think it would take something very bad to make them do something.

In one of his latest tweets (28 May) he writes

"my instinct, as a GP, is that I’m likely — at a hugely disproportionate rate — to come into contact with vast numbers of people who may test +ve. isolating for 2 weeks following every single contact is unworkable & unnecessary, & I shan’t be complying with any such instruction."

I can't screenshot it, but here's the link with the archive:



When he is directly asked won't you isolate if you come in contact with a positive patient, he doesn't really answer, he talks about "potential positive".

However imho he's suggesting he won't comply with guidelines, which seems to me a patient safety problem but the GMC won't probably notice or do anything.
 
I agree, the GMC probably won't do much unless a patient complains or another doctor is worried about patient safety and then also I think it would take something very bad to make them do something.

In one of his latest tweets (28 May) he writes

"my instinct, as a GP, is that I’m likely — at a hugely disproportionate rate — to come into contact with vast numbers of people who may test +ve. isolating for 2 weeks following every single contact is unworkable & unnecessary, & I shan’t be complying with any such instruction."

I can't screenshot it, but here's the link with the archive:



When he is directly asked won't you isolate if you come in contact with a positive patient, he doesn't really answer, he talks about "potential positive".

However imho he's suggesting he won't comply with guidelines, which seems to me a patient safety problem but the GMC won't probably notice or do anything.
Screenshot_20200531-125144_Chrome.jpg
Here's another one of him stating he won't comply with guidance. The fucker just loves to poz.
 
Again and again in this thread, people have made hopeful statements about the GMC doing something.... they won't, there are far worse Doctors than Harrop currently practicing medicine in the UK. There is no way the GMC is going to set the precedent for disciplining a doctor for something he's tweeted, no matter how retarded.

The re-validation however that's different. He needs to re-validate every 5 years, and my understanding that involves verifying that he was practicing at a sufficient level of competency over the previous 5 year period. The requirements aren't particularly onerous for a GP that's working full time in a large GP practice. One interesting component of this is a statutory role of 'responsible officer' exists, a Doctor with direct contact with the GP who's responsible for overseeing and making recommendations.


My understanding is that larger GP practices would have their own responsible officer. They would also have the admin staff, to verify work done, etc. He's not part of a practice though, he's a locum. (incidentally if someone can comment on how typical it is for a newly qualified GP to immediately start work as a locum rather than join a practice that would be interesting)

It sometimes happens that Doctors move into other professions, the GMC is cautious about the idea of part time doctors. There were issues a few years back with Doctors taking maternity leave, and even though the majority of new GP's are women, the GMC was pretty grudging about making changes.

Anyway I have no idea who Harrop's responsible officer is, but I suspect he'll have a key role to play a few years from now.

Anyway I have a belief he'll stop practicing himself long before he needs to re-validate.
I agree with you to a point, but he has obviously had words of advice: in 2019 he changed his twitter handle from “DrAdrainHarrop” to “AdrianHarrop”, and he locked his account. He also dropped the “Dr” from his profile, only recently reinstated.
So while he wasn’t under official sanction (it would show on his GMC listing), he was given “words of advice”, either formally or informally
As an aside, the twitter account @DrAdrianHarrop was taken over by someone who ran a series of instagram and twitter accounts targeting Harrop and Uncle Tony. Before all of them were suspended, they resulted in Amy Petrelli and Robyn Young attempting or threatening suicide.
It is also rumoured that the accounts perpetrating these heinous acts were reported to around 6 UK police forces and the Garda in Sligo.
Such world class trolling is sadly lacking these days, and I wonder if we will ever see the likes of the “Belinda” accounts again....
 
Last edited:
View attachment 1335899
Here's another one of him stating he won't comply with guidance. The fucker just loves to poz.
I wonder if this is just a way for him to pretend that he's doing real doctoring rather than just phone work. How many covid positive people is he really in contact with manning the phones? I thought he was staying away from them because he is in a high risk category because of his diabetes.

Seems more of a larp of being a brave doctor who is out risking death by Wu flu every day ...
 
I wonder if this is just a way for him to pretend that he's doing real doctoring rather than just phone work. How many covid positive people is he really in contact with manning the phones? I thought he was staying away from them because he is in a high risk category because of his diabetes.

Seems more of a larp of being a brave doctor who is out risking death by Wu flu every day ...

he is at a high risk of being diagnosed in the future with ICD (International Classification of Diseases) code W22.02 which is walking into a lamp-post (see https://icd.codes/icd10cm/W2202 )

And what does he mean by "fleeting encounters"? how does he examine patients without his hands? doesn't he hear the heart? measure blood pressure? look into the throat? feel the liver? how, dressed like an astronaut?

What does he mean "instinctive non-compliance with guidance"? doing heart surgery in a parking lot with pigeons pecking at the patient? telling diabetics to drink sugar? giving tea for broken bones sticking out of a leg?
 
Anyway I have a belief he'll stop practicing himself long before he needs to re-validate.

I think he is much more interested in his hobby of aggressive misogynistic harassment of women than in being a doctor. Anyway who could trust this freak to give them medical care, when from his apparent public insanity, the slightest divergence from any opinion he has could suddenly turn him into a homosexual Harold Shipman?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom