US Do Democrats Have a Messaging Problem?

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Article Archive

Do Democrats Have a Messaging Problem?​

1636555942840.jpeg
Some critics say the Democratic Party is struggling to respond to issues seized upon by conservative news media.

Jeremy W. Peters
By Jeremy W. Peters
Nov. 9, 2021

Sign up here to get On Politics in your inbox on Tuesdays and Thursdays.
When Republicans lost big in the 2012 election, the party commissioned a post-mortem analysis that arrived at a blunt conclusion about the way it communicated: “The Republican Party needs to stop talking to itself,” said the report, informally known as “the autopsy.”

After the elections last week, in which Democrats across the country lost races they expected to win or narrowly escaped defeat, some are asking whether the Democratic Party is suffering from a similar problem of insularity in its messaging.

Critics and some prominent liberals like Ruy Teixeira, a left-of-center political scientist, have argued that Democrats are trying to explain major issues — such as inflation, crime and school curriculum — with answers that satisfy the party’s progressive base but are unpersuasive and off-putting to most other voters.

The clearest example is in Virginia, where the Democratic candidate for governor, Terry McAuliffe, lost his election after spending weeks trying to minimize and discredit his opponent’s criticisms of public school education, particularly the way that racism is talked about. Mr. McAuliffe accused the Republican, Glenn Youngkin, of campaigning on a “made-up” issue and of blowing a “racist dog whistle.”

But about a quarter of Virginia voters said that the debate over teaching critical race theory, a graduate-level academic framework that has become a stand-in for a debate over what to teach about race and racism in schools, was the most important factor in their decision, and 72 percent of those voters cast ballots for Mr. Youngkin, according to a survey of more than 2,500 voters conducted for The Associated Press by NORC at the University of Chicago, a nonpartisan research organization.

The nuances of critical race theory, which focuses onthe ways that institutions perpetuate racism, and the hyperbolic tone of the coverage of the issue in conservative news media point to why Democrats have struggled to come up with an effective response.

Mr. Teixeira calls the Democrats’ problem with critical race theory and other galvanizing issues the “Fox News Fallacy.”

These issues are ripe for distortions and exaggeration by Republican politicians and their allies in the news media. But Mr. Teixeira says Democrats should not dismiss voters’ concerns as simply right-wing misinformation.

“An issue is not necessarily completely invalid just because Fox News mentions it,” he said.

In an interview, Mr. Teixeira said his logic applied to questions far beyond critical race theory. “I can’t tell you how many times I analyze a particular issue, saying this is a real concern,” he said. “And the first thing I hear is, ‘Hey, this is a right-wing talking point. You’re playing into the hands of the enemy.’”

Fox News is not the only institution capable of producing this kind of reaction from some on the left — it was just the one Mr. Teixeira chose to make his point as vividly as possible.

What to Know About the 2021 Virginia Election​

The conservative news media is full of stories that can make it sound as if the country is living through a nightmare. Rising prices and supply chain difficulties are cast as economic threats on par with the “stagflation” crisis of the 1970s, a comparison that is oversimplified because neither inflation nor unemployment is as high now. Stories of violent crime in large cities are given prominent placement and frequent airing; the same is true of coverage about the record number of migrants being apprehended at the southern border.

The Biden administration has struggled to address concerns about all of these issues. Critics pounced when the White House chief of staff, Ron Klain, posted a tweetthat cast inflation and supply chain disruptions as “high class problems,” seeming to dismiss the anxiety that Americans say they have about their own finances.

And despite border crossings hitting the highest number on record since at least 1960, when the government began tracking them, the Biden administration has resisted referring to the issue as a “crisis.” President Biden has faced persistent questions about why he has not visited the border.

Takeaways From the 2021 Elections​


Card 1 of 5
A G.O.P. pathway in Virginia. The win by Glenn Youngkin, who campaigned heavily in the governor’s race on education and who evaded the shadow of Donald Trump, could serve as a blueprint for Republicans in the midterms.

A rightward shift emerges. Mr. Youngkin outperformed Mr. Trump’s 2020 results across Virginia, while a surprisingly strong showing in the New Jersey governor’s race by the G.O.P. candidate unsettled Democrats.

Democratic panic is rising. Less than a year after taking power in Washington, the party faces a grim immediate future as it struggles to energize voters and continues to lose messaging wars to Republicans.

A new direction in N.Y.C. Eric Adams will be the second Black mayor in the city’s history. The win for the former police captain sets in motion a more center-left Democratic leadership.

Mixed results for Democrats in cities. Voters in Minneapolis rejected an amendment to replace the Police Department while progressives scored a victory in Boston’s mayoral race.

Then there’s crime. After a year and a half of calls from the progressive left for drastic policing reform, voters across the country last week rejected candidates and policies aligned with the “defund the police” movement. In two of the most striking examples, Minneapolis voters said no to a referendum to dismantle their city’s troubled police department. And New Yorkers elected as mayor a former police captain, Eric Adams, who strongly opposes “defund” efforts.

One liberal who apparently recognized the broader problems that Democrats have had explaining their platforms to voters was Maya Wiley, who ran against Mr. Adams in the mayoral primary as a proponent of sweeping police reforms. In an opinion essay for The New Republic this week, Ms. Wiley, a civil rights lawyer, wrote that while Republicans distorted the debate over critical race theory in Virginia, they also offered a more compelling message on education.

“If you only heard evening news sound bites, you would think all he talked about on the campaign trail was critical race theory,” Ms. Wiley said of Mr. Youngkin. “Not so. In fact, he sounded like a moderate Democrat, with the notable exception of C.R.T.”

Despite the dog whistling, Wiley said, the message was effective because it was empathetic. “He was saying he understood their pain,” she said.
 
No, they have a sanity problem and still have to frame everything around Trump.
 
But about a quarter of Virginia voters said that the debate over teaching critical race theory, a graduate-level academic framework that has become a stand-in for a debate over what to teach about race and racism in schools, was the most important factor in their decision, and 72 percent of those voters cast ballots for Mr. Youngkin, according to a survey of more than 2,500 voters conducted for The Associated Press by NORC at the University of Chicago, a nonpartisan research organization.

That was part of it, I'm sure. But I think the most significant factor that led people to vote for Youngkin was the fact a degenerate troon faggot rapist assaulted two girls... and was protected from any repercussions. And that McAuliffe dismissed it, as did Obama when he came to VA to mug for the cameras and callously dismiss the "phony, trumped up culture wars".
 
But about a quarter of Virginia voters said that the debate over teaching critical race theory, a graduate-level academic framework that has become a stand-in for a debate over what to teach about race and racism in schools, was the most important factor in their decision, and 72 percent of those voters cast ballots for Mr. Youngkin, according to a survey of more than 2,500 voters conducted for The Associated Press by NORC at the University of Chicago, a nonpartisan research organization.
Obsessing over their own side's definitions to the point that they ignore what the "other side" is even complaining about.
 
Oh no, those dastardly Republican liars have mystified the proles again
 
Lol Youngkin didn't even disagree with anything Trump said. He just didn't talk like Trumps and let the Dems do the campaigning for him while he focused on School issues.

I mean look at this shit:

He got the Trump voters in the bag without any effort and then attacked the moderate's and people disgusted with the left.
 

Attachments

  • YoungkimTrump-2.jpg
    YoungkimTrump-2.jpg
    582.6 KB · Views: 21
  • YoungkinTrump-1.jpg
    YoungkinTrump-1.jpg
    103.4 KB · Views: 20
No, they have a reality problem. Everything they scream in your face about contradicts observable reality and they are doing everything in their power to redefine language itself to try and make people mistrust their lying eyes.
 
The messaging problem is that they're smug elitists who are barely aware of the working middle class and they don't bother hiding this contempt when they talk.
 
Lol Youngkin didn't even disagree with anything Trump said. He just didn't talk like Trumps and let the Dems do the campaigning for him while he focused on School issues.

I mean look at this shit:

He got the Trump voters in the bag without any effort and then attacked the moderate's and people disgusted with the left.
Keep in mind, the Democrats are so ORANGE MAN BAD, that THEY are the ones that sent out those mailers.

The Dems legitimately think that "Trump endorses Youngkin" is a win for THEM.
 
LOL, Dems get wrekt in an election cycle and a journo comes in not to tell them to re-think their policy approach, but to stop saying the quiet part out loud because people are starting to notice.

Also, I see they're still all-in on playing word games like annoying children about CRT/wokeness and education. Let's take out the word games and make it really simple: teaching little kids about racial inequality is absolute fucking brain poison, because little kids have no concept of race unless you feed it to them. The left is unironically stoking racism hardcore with this policy.

Normies are noticing and the DNC reaction is "WELL ACKSHUALLY that technically isn't CRT because *things that don't matter*". Fuck off, you know damn well what's being discussed, everyone that notices it wants you burned at the stake for it, and the tidal shift is coming. How badly the DNC drowns in the undertow is completely up to their reaction.

Keep playing cutesy words games and stay assmad while losing elections handily in +10 Dem states.
 
Ironic considering some of the conclusions. I wonder how much of the article was gutted by a zealous progressive editor.
Was checking out some of the stuff he linked like "The Fox News Fallacy" that makes me think it was just him being genuine. The linked bit brings up a definition of CRT that is seemingly critical of it, but then goes on to defend the idea that judging people on their merits is wrong.
CRT is a theoretical perspective that asserts that race is always about inequality and domination. CRT has a few main tenets…
1. Colorblind racism—Deemphasizing the role of race and racism, including to focus on concepts of merit, is itself a manifestation of racism.
2. Interest convergence—Members of the dominant group will only support equality when it’s in their best interest to do so.
3. Race and racism are always tied together. Race is a construct meant to preserve white dominance over people of color, while making it seem like life is about meritocracy.
4. Inattention to systemic racism—An unwillingness to recognize the full force of systemic racism as determining disparities between groups is a denial of the reality of racism today (and evidence of ignorance at best and racism at worst)….
[W]hile rightly shining a light on racism as a problem, CRT leaves no space for non-racist reasons to see the world—or, in this case, the causes of inequality—differently.
Going through the chain of articles it looks like they kinda understand that CRT is about imagining all things are racist, but then goes full dumbass by suggesting that the left needs to be more polite in not assuming right wingers are denying "systemic racism" exists when that's exactly what they are doing. So I think the original author and those he's referencing are in full denial that people could fundamentally disagree with their world view. They seem to all fully support CRT while also thinking the only real problem is they're not being polite enough about telling white people that they're racist for not judging people based on their skin color.
So what’s the path forward? Here are a few suggestions:

To conservatives: Stop trying to enact legislative bans on CRT. Such bans are censorious, probably unconstitutional, and, simply put, will do nothing to solve the underlying problem.

To progressives: Stop talking about CRT and, more importantly, its related ideas as though objections to it and concerns about it are all driven by a denial of systemic racism or an unwillingness to acknowledge the reality of slavery. As I’ve pointed out here, this is to grossly miss the point. The importance of this point stands even if the loudest critics are not raising the concerns I’ve outlined here.
 
Then there’s crime. After a year and a half of calls from the progressive left for drastic policing reform, voters across the country last week rejected candidates and policies aligned with the “defund the police” movement. In two of the most striking examples, Minneapolis voters said no to a referendum to dismantle their city’s troubled police department. And New Yorkers elected as mayor a former police captain, Eric Adams, who strongly opposes “defund” efforts.
Voters saw cities torched last year because of that. The unmistakable core message of the rioters was that policing, law enforcement officials, the courts, the jails, and the law itself was racist because of... CRT. The legal system as an institution is racist because blah blah whatever leftie word-salad white supremacy.

They don't want their kids to be a part of it. The rioting, I mean. Nobody wants their kid to turn into a radical anarchist shitbag who destroys the neighborhood and resents society (and their parents) over nebulous academic concepts that function more like a set of cult beliefs.
 
But about a quarter of Virginia voters said that the debate over teaching critical race theory, a graduate-level academic framework that has become a stand-in for a debate over what to teach about race and racism in schools.
The dems' position on CRT is contradictory. If it is not being taught in primary/secondary school, what objection is there to establishing a policy restricting its teaching?

The reaction reveals the lie. The dems want a cold race war, but on their terms against completely demoralized whites.
The conservative news media is full of stories that can make it sound as if the country is living through a nightmare. Rising prices and supply chain difficulties are cast as economic threats on par with the “stagflation” crisis of the 1970s, a comparison that is oversimplified because neither inflation nor unemployment is as high now. Stories of violent crime in large cities are given prominent placement and frequent airing; the same is true of coverage about the record number of migrants being apprehended at the southern border.
Sure. And the progressive news media can give us wall-to-wall coverage about St. George of the Fentanyl, then maintain near-complete radio silence on the dearth of jogger-on-jogger killings, or try to explain away burning cities as both 'mostly peaceful' and 'racial reckonings.'

Just the fact that the media will never own any wrongdoing on their part is why they are unable to change course and win back the people who don't trust them. Personally, I hope they never get it. I want them to keep screaming that everyone is racist until whites just shrug and say 'So what?'
 
Voters saw cities torched last year because of that. The unmistakable core message of the rioters was that policing, law enforcement officials, the courts, the jails, and the law itself was racist because of... CRT. The legal system as an institution is racist because blah blah whatever leftie word-salad white supremacy.

They don't want their kids to be a part of it. The rioting, I mean. Nobody wants their kid to turn into a radical anarchist shitbag who destroys the neighborhood and resents society (and their parents) over nebulous academic concepts that function more like a set of cult beliefs.

I think you’re onto something significant here.

Think of the Portland riots, think of the mugshots. Of course one’s first thought is, how can so many ugly people be in a single location without the Hellmouth opening. But here are a few other observations I made along the way:

1. Why are all these white teens and twentysomethings out here doing this, where did they come from, how did they get stirred up like this, where did they even get this IDEA which is completely alien to normal people, I know it’s Portland but how can they have this many insane white kids and nearly kids?

2. Why are all these fat white Karen’s in their 30s and 40s out here involved, shouldn’t they be home eating their feelings?

But then you notice this...

2a. Those fat white Karens...when Andy Ngo investigates...they’re teachers. There’s fat black ones too, teachers, all of them that or - yep - employed by the school district as DEI staff.

And then the Gabriel Gipe video came out and it all made sense.

The kids are there because this isn’t a new indoctrination program, they‘ve been indoctrinating kids in schools for years and encouraging them to do exactly what their parents do not want them doing. They were at the protests because their teachers have been training them for this for at least 10 years and now it has paid off. Gipe directed his students to go to riots for extra credit. These teachers no doubt did as well. Social emotional learning is meant to do this, to inculcate such guilt and hatred of themselves and their families that they’ll do this.

They ARE trying to turn out kids into monsters. They really are.
 
Last edited:
I think you’re onto something significant here.

Think of the Portland riots, think of the mugshots. Of course one’s first thought is, how can so many ugly people be in a single location without the Hellmouth opening. But here are a few other observations I made along the way:

1. Why are all these white teens and twentysomethings out here doing this, where did they come from, how did they get stirred up like this, where did they even get this IDEA which is completely alien to normal people, I know it’s Portland but how can they have this many insane white kids and nearly kids?

2. Why are all these fat white Karen’s in their 30s and 40s out here involved, shouldn’t they be home eating their feelings?

But then you notice this...

2a. Those fat white Karens...when Andy Ngo investigates...they’re teachers. There’s fat black ones too, teachers, all of them that or - yep - employed by the school district as DEI staff.

And then the Gabriel Gipe video came out and it all made sense.

The kids are there because this isn’t a new indoctrination program, they‘ve been indoctrinating kids in schools for years and encouraging them to do exactly what their parents do not want them doing. They were at the protests because their teachers have been training them for this for at least 10 years and now it has paid off. Gipe directed his students to go to riots for extra credit. These teachers no doubt did as well. Social emotional learning is meant to do this, to inculcate such guilt and hatred of themselves and their families that they’ll do this.

They ARE trying to turn out kids into monsters. They really are.
Bingo. Being a teacher or social worker allows them to select those that are having trouble in society or with their peers for their in group. They create some little club they create and manage. In this club you learn radical liberation beliefs and it becomes very us vs them. They then graduate to some "safe space" communal home once they age out of school. A cult indoctrination pipeline.

They have been at these games for a long time and in Portland they have become very entrenched. I mean, shit, look at Phil. He got plugged right into social services, housing, and trooncare because he was willing to be an Antifa footsoldier. It's even worse in the Bay Area. Remember the Bike Lock guy what going the Yvette Falarca BAMN rabbit hole led to? BAMN has been around since the 90's. Like I said, entrenched.

It's probably too deep of a dive for normies. But they get the general idea that something isn't right with some of the teachers in schools.
 
critical race theory, a graduate-level academic framework that has become a stand-in for a debate over what to teach about race and racism in schools...which focuses on the ways that institutions perpetuate racism
Classic bit of left-wing dissembling there - lying about what CRT is, so they can belittle the people who don't want it taught to their children.
 
Back
Top Bottom