Disney General - The saddest fandom on Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter KO 864
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Which is Better

  • Chicken Little

    Votes: 433 27.4%

  • Hunchback 2

    Votes: 57 3.6%

  • A slow death

    Votes: 1,088 68.9%
  • Total voters
    1,578
Vyse Inglebard said:
(save for Cars)
Click to expand...
fuck you cars 1 was great (and where it should've ended, maybe tater's tall tales).

dunno why you have to even ask:
In January 2006, Disney ultimately agreed to buy Pixar for approximately $7.4 billion in an all-stock deal.[53] Following Pixar shareholder approval, the acquisition was completed May 5, 2006.
Click to expand...

Vyse Inglebard said:
And spoiler alert: it was trash.
Click to expand...
still haven't watched it and zero intention to. and considering how much you don't hear about the franchise anymore I assume it's basically game of thrones s8: the movie.
 
Last edited:
Lil Miku said:
According to a casting call that spread a bit on Twitter earlier this year, one of Mei's friends is gonna be trans.
It's the doofy-haired, green-outfitted one.
Click to expand...

I was betting more on the yellow sweater girl, maybe even the purple girl who looks like a toe but looking closer at the green one she definitely could be viewed as a boy if she weren’t trans.

Canada in 2003 sure is diverse.
 
Rondo Richter Belmont said:
I was betting more on the yellow sweater girl, maybe even the purple girl who looks like a toe but looking closer at the green one she definitely could be viewed as a boy if she weren’t trans.

Canada in 2003 sure is diverse.
Click to expand...
I was thinking the green one because 1. The clothes (she could be a closeted transgirl) and 2. She's white, and you can't possibly have a cis white female in a movie anymore.
Time will only tell! Place your bets, everyone!
 
Lil Miku said:
I was thinking the green one because 1. The clothes (she could be a closeted transgirl) and 2. She's white, and you can't possibly have a cis white female in a movie anymore.
Time will only tell! Place your bets, everyone!
Click to expand...
Didn't realize the one in green wasn't a dude, I thought it was some gay kid. I didn't watch the trailer mind you, looks ugly so I have zero interest even if it were potentially a great movie. Which earlier this year with the teaser I didn't think it sounded good then either. Ranma 1/2 meets Steven Universe, except Canada.
 
The art style is really unpleasant. Luca at least had a sense of stylization despite the bean-mouths. On top of this, the premise has been done a million times and I can't help but feel really uncomfortable that a movie about teen puberty conveniently features a troon minor.

Are we SURE Lasseter was #MeToo worthy? Because things got a whole lot creepier after he left.
 
Muttnik said:
Are we SURE Lasseter was #MeToo worthy? Because things got a whole lot creepier after he left.
Click to expand...
The Woke simply could not stand a good old-fashioned storyteller like Lasseter (supposed hatred of Lilo & Stitch and actual hatred of the Buzz Lightyear cartoon notwithstanding) making their media, so they made up stories like "HE HUGGED ME INAPPROPRIATELY" (?????) to kick him out so they could have unfettered control over what they feed the masses.

And it shows: The only original Pixar movies that have gotten positive audience reception recently were ones directed by people who directed movies under Lasseter. Inside Out and Soul? Directed by Pete Docter, who also directed Monsters Inc. Coco? Lee Unkrich, who also co directed Toy Story 2 and directed Toy Story 3. Everything else has gotten a "meh" audience reception at best. Why? Because what the old Pixar found the most important - story and characters - is not what's most important to the new Pixar. Story and characters? Who gives a fuck? It can't be as important as virtue signaling about the (fifty) "FIRST TRANS CHARACTER IN A KIDS MOVIE EVAR!!1111!!!"
 
I watched Bugs Life the other night for the first time in almost 15 years and it’s insane how well it holds up, old tech and politically incorrect jokes nonwithstanding (but fuck did it make the lol ladybug is a guy! jokes funnier). They’re trying way too hard nowadays to make the “deep heartfelt Pixar message” and not focusing enough on the stories that carry it. I was shocked how legitimately frightening the grasshopper gang was and how unafraid they were to make the villain actually threatening. The whole bit with then smashing into the tunnels legitimately played out like a horror movie. Nu Pixar wouldn’t have the balls to do that.
 
Vyse Inglebard said:
The Woke simply could not stand a good old-fashioned storyteller like Lasseter (supposed hatred of Lilo & Stitch and actual hatred of the Buzz Lightyear cartoon notwithstanding) making their media, so they made up stories like "HE HUGGED ME INAPPROPRIATELY" (?????) to kick him out so they could have unfettered control over what they feed the masses.

And it shows: The only original Pixar movies that have gotten positive audience reception recently were ones directed by people who directed movies under Lasseter. Inside Out and Soul? Directed by Pete Docter, who also directed Monsters Inc. Coco? Lee Unkrich, who also co directed Toy Story 2 and directed Toy Story 3. Everything else has gotten a "meh" audience reception at best. Why? Because what the old Pixar found the most important - story and characters - is not what's most important to the new Pixar. Story and characters? Who gives a fuck? It can't be as important as virtue signaling about the (fifty) "FIRST TRANS CHARACTER IN A KIDS MOVIE EVAR!!1111!!!"
Click to expand...
Or all those pedo reviewers praising Luca as a gay movie?
 
Vyse Inglebard said:
The Woke simply could not stand a good old-fashioned storyteller like Lasseter (supposed hatred of Lilo & Stitch and actual hatred of the Buzz Lightyear cartoon notwithstanding) making their media, so they made up stories like "HE HUGGED ME INAPPROPRIATELY" (?????) to kick him out so they could have unfettered control over what they feed the masses.

And it shows: The only original Pixar movies that have gotten positive audience reception recently were ones directed by people who directed movies under Lasseter. Inside Out and Soul? Directed by Pete Docter, who also directed Monsters Inc. Coco? Lee Unkrich, who also co directed Toy Story 2 and directed Toy Story 3. Everything else has gotten a "meh" audience reception at best. Why? Because what the old Pixar found the most important - story and characters - is not what's most important to the new Pixar. Story and characters? Who gives a fuck? It can't be as important as virtue signaling about the (fifty) "FIRST TRANS CHARACTER IN A KIDS MOVIE EVAR!!1111!!!"
Click to expand...
I ever showed you the Tumblr making fun of John Lasseter from 2011, from somebody who worked at Pixar? He got really upset over that.

(But Inside Out and Coco were produced under Lasseter...)
 
That Encanto movie, which is probably a shoe-in for Best Animated Film, looks to be so blatant with the "gurl puwr!" message.
 
The Nothingness said:
That Encanto movie, which is probably a shoe-in for Best Animated Film, looks to be so blatant with the "gurl puwr!" message.
Click to expand...
Probably. Disney CG movies look so bland lately, they really should start changing up the styles and stop using Rapunzel as a base model. Or bring back 2D and use Xeroxing like in the dark days.
 
cactus said:
Probably. Disney CG movies look so bland lately, they really should start changing up the styles and stop using Rapunzel as a base model. Or bring back 2D and use Xeroxing like in the dark days.
Click to expand...
Lord knows I'd love that.
 
Product Placement said:
I doubt the movie will be good and the idea would be better suited as its own thing rather than based on any ip but I can't think of another movie with a plot like it and rather take a bad movie like that than a 1 to 1 rehash Disney love to do.

Un-self aware can't say that going off that post but going off the number of times Disney has done the feminist princess who is not like your other Disney princesses thing it wouldn't be shocking.
Click to expand...
It's the difference between eating rotting wood and trash. Both are still disgusting. And you know for a damn fact that just going by the premise alone they are not self aware. If you think animated cartoons are getting run over by shitty remakes, then make more animated cartoons, not remakes. You can tell they aren't self aware by that post unless you can't read between lines.
 
Seventh Star said:
It's the difference between eating rotting wood and trash. Both are still disgusting. And you know for a damn fact that just going by the premise alone they are not self aware. If you think animated cartoons are getting run over by shitty remakes, then make more animated cartoons, not remakes. You can tell they aren't self aware by that post unless you can't read between lines.
Click to expand...
You have kind of summed up why this movie is interesting to me which I thought I explained in my last post. The premise by its self could be a very interesting satire that is self-aware however going off past Disney movies such as Ralph Breaks the Internet it will likely fail but even in the failure, it would still be interesting to me to see where it failed and how it failed. Something like the Lion King remake lacks anything like that being a 1 to 1 rehash.

I mean animation-wise Disney is making more shit than ever just all of it is CGI animation. While it would be nice to see them make 2D animation again and stop making the live-action remakes it's clear they won't until they stop making money which is why I would never pay to watch any of them,
 
I know everyone likes to meme on Small World but holy shit (sorry first tweet is the last, fuck mobile posting.) 67A3685A-4897-44F3-8239-537FFD724DC9.jpeg F3EC45E4-D6AC-4F34-A7C2-49EDE269384F.jpeg 6CB1766A-3EA7-40DA-8FC4-CCA1C972A872.jpeg 38A9D3C8-89F8-484C-8AD6-9DFE595B6FC2.jpeg D0C3BEAC-DF03-4F70-AA6C-5813FBEC6A9B.jpeg 261C371D-6A73-4E21-8DEE-3C613396D35B.jpeg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom