wtfNeedSignUp
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
Fascism has been "right wing strawman" for decades now. The actual movements in practice are just slightly different versions of socialism where you pick and choose who gets to gain country resources, at least until it falls into the same dictatorial hellhole they all became, where resources were limited to everyone and new rules were made every day to prop up the failing regime.So... What real life fascist theory should it be drawing on? Genuine question, if you know some books I don't know of, name them.
Part of the problem here is that communism has concrete foundational texts, and it has a continued legacy into the modern day. Fascism doesn't have so much of that. You have Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, and maybe Mosely, but those guys were all quite different from each other, politically. There was no bible of fascism for them to base their ideology on, and of them, neither Franco or Hitler even identified themselves as fascist. There are no modern day fascist parties, there's no fascist movement, it's more of a historical description of a certain type of mid-20th century authoritatianism than a coherent ideology. Most of the "theory" about fascism is post-hoc analysis of regimes that are already extinct.
Honestly I think they did their best with the source material here, the issue is that fascism actually just isn't that deep or well defined as an ideology (that's also why it's annoying, and hard to effectively refute, when people describe anythign they don't like as fascist).
The only real right wing political party (that isn't the meme Monarchism) is free market/small government that goes contrary to socialism. But games don't like to admit them despite being the only successful governments in the 20th century.

