Science 'Digital Self-Harm': When Teens Cyberbully Themselves - So much for the wisdom of Tyler the Creator and his legendary Twitter post...

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
FRIDAY, Sept. 2, 2022 -- Up to 9% of American teens say they've engaged in what's known as "digital self-harm" -- anonymously posting negative comments about themselves on social media.

As is the case with acts of physical self-harm such as cutting, this "virtual" self-harm is associated with a higher risk for thinking about or attempting suicide, according to a startling new study.

It found that teens who engaged in digital self-harm were up to seven times more likely to have considered suicide and as much as 15 times more likely to have made an attempt.

"We can't say that one causes the other, but we do know they are connected in some way," said lead author Justin Patchin. He's co-director of the Cyberbullying Research Center at the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire.

But why would anyone want to virtually trash themselves to begin with?

Patchin said that his own research has identified multiple motivations.

Self-hatred is one, he noted, as is attention-seeking. In other cases, it can be depression, an attempt to be funny, or simply boredom.

Some teens admit that it's just their way to suss out how others might react to examples of bullying, in order to "know if they were talking about me behind my back."

To gain more insight, Patchin's team took a deep dive into survey responses offered up by nearly 5,000 middle and high schoolers in 2019.

The 12- to 17-year-old participants were asked if they had contemplated or attempted suicide in the past year.

Roughly 8% said they had seriously thought about it, and about 5% said they had actually attempted suicide.

Participants were also asked if they had ever anonymously posted something "mean" about themselves online and/or anonymously bullied themselves online.

In all, 9% said they had done the former, while about 5% had done the latter.

The findings, which are similar to other recent studies, held up equally across gender and race, though a much bigger proportion of LGBTQ+ teens said they had considered and/or attempted suicide in the past year (24% and 10%, respectively).

The research team then stacked digital self-harm behavior up against suicide thoughts and attempts.

The result: Teens who said they had anonymously shared mean posts about themselves were about five times more likely to have contemplated suicide and those who had self-bullied were about seven times more likely to have done so.

Similarly, mean self-posting was associated with up to nine times the likelihood of attempting suicide, and digital self-bullying with 15 times the risk.

Robin Kowalski is a psychology professor at Clemson University in South Carolina. She reviewed the findings and suspects what she called "the concept of mattering" is at the heart of it all.

"[That is] the degree to which people feel they are important or significant," Kowalski said. "The extent to which other people make them feel that they matter."

When people feel they don't matter and struggle with low self-esteem, Kowalski said, they may view negative self-posting in online forums as a way to either get advice or validation for their feelings.

That such behavior would be linked to higher suicide risk is "not at all" surprising, she said.

"People who commit suicide feel that the world would be better off without them, [and] that they are a burden to others," Kowalski noted. "Putting negative information about oneself online and potentially receiving validation for that is a way to confirm that one doesn't belong in this world."

So what can be done to help?

"This is difficult, because digital self-harm is difficult to detect," researcher Patchin said.

But parents and friends should help those who are bullied by others, regardless of who the aggressor is, he said.

"If you see someone being mistreated online, reach out and offer help," Patchin suggested. "Report it to the site, app or game. Telling an adult you trust can help to make things better. Don't just stand by and let it happen."

Being kind is a key to making people feel that they matter, according to Kowalski.

"We can make them feel that they have value and are important," she said. "We need to make it clear to people that they belong and that they are not a burden."

Their findings were recently published in the journal Child and Adolescent Mental Health.

ETA
Source: https://www.drugs.com/news/digital-self-harm-teens-cyberbully-themselves-107599.html (archive)
 
Last edited:
Maybe we should start a bullying-focused Big Brothers/Sisters program for these kids.
With our mentoring, we could raise that 5% to at least 41%.
 
It found that teens who engaged in digital self-harm were up to seven times more likely to have considered suicide and as much as 15 times more likely to have made an attempt.

Suicide is not the worst idea if your problem is that you send yourself abusive DMs...

 
It isn't cyberbullying that's the problem, it's the toxic dopamine cycle that fuels modern social media. These kids are pressured to put their face and name out there and valued on their looks or how many likes they can get. It also doesn't help that their personal and online life is so interconnected that an online post can ruin them socially at school. If I was a kid in school today I would absolutely be a neurotic mess obsessed with my own image.
 
When you reward victimhood with a shortcut to the top of the social prestige ladder, people will find ways to become victims.

It's literally just "when you subsidize something, more of it is produced," with social capital instead of physical.
 
When my kid was born I told my family “no social media”. They fussed a bit, we compromised and I use Tinybeans for distant grammas and aunties but that’s not public facing.

I was horrified by the thought of him growing up and realizing one day there’s a whole identity his parents put out into the world without his permission or knowledge. So my goal is to let him start his life as anonymously as possible and try to foster respect for his own privacy.

It’s hard to believe you should not over share if your potty training videos are still on Mom’s Facebook.
 
Huh. Not one mention, not even a hint, that the self-bullying might be anything other than based on a negative self-esteem. They don't entertain for a second that any of these kids could write mean things about themselves for victim points, or to pretend they're not bullying by faking also being a target.

It's Mean Girls 101 - as well as a literal plot point in the film Mean Girls. But no, these little angels writing mean things about themselves are just as unaffected by the internet culture that celebrates victimhood the same way they're unaffected by the social contagion of troonism.
 
Okay newfag where the fuck is this from and where is the archive?

You dumb faggots need to learn to put the link and archive, cause these niggers will delete shit. Also nobullshit title for the article.
 
So now it's just this.

076.png
 
Okay newfag where the fuck is this from and where is the archive?

You dumb faggots need to learn to put the link and archive, cause these niggers will delete shit. Also nobullshit title for the article.
Mea Culpa.

Story is at:
https://www.drugs.com/news/digital-self-harm-teens-cyberbully-themselves-107599.html

I didn't archive it because it's just text and all the text is already here on this server since I posted the story here.
Here's a link to the Original Study, as well. I'm not going to archive it as it's got a DOI number so it's not like it's going anywhere soon. If it is ever retracted, it'll stay up, but with a retraction. In fact, it's paywalled, so you can't even get to it.
 
When my kid was born I told my family “no social media”. They fussed a bit, we compromised and I use Tinybeans for distant grammas and aunties but that’s not public facing.

I was horrified by the thought of him growing up and realizing one day there’s a whole identity his parents put out into the world without his permission or knowledge. So my goal is to let him start his life as anonymously as possible and try to foster respect for his own privacy.

It’s hard to believe you should not over share if your potty training videos are still on Mom’s Facebook.
Same - private channel for close to distant family and no pics on social media at all. I know people who have their kids entire lives on things like instagram - like ‘here is my three year old breastfeeding look how crunchy I am.’ Or ‘here are ten pics of my naked kids in the sea.’
And if you try to gently express that maybe such pics, along with literally hundreds of naked and intimate ones (emotionally intimate, like a child crying for example) might come back to bite them you are a ‘hater.’ Or a ‘prude.’ No, let your kids frolic naked in the sea, just don’t put pictures of them out in the public domain. They could be used and altered by people, or in future they be old used to mock or leverage your child. If you’re posting pics of kids in social media it should be very clean, bland stuff like ‘here were are smiling at a picnic.’ Nobody seems to think
 
Huh. Not one mention, not even a hint, that the self-bullying might be anything other than based on a negative self-esteem. They don't entertain for a second that any of these kids could write mean things about themselves for victim points, or to pretend they're not bullying by faking also being a target.

It's Mean Girls 101 - as well as a literal plot point in the film Mean Girls. But no, these little angels writing mean things about themselves are just as unaffected by the internet culture that celebrates victimhood the same way they're unaffected by the social contagion of troonism.
But it says right there.... read the whole article
 
Same - private channel for close to distant family and no pics on social media at all. I know people who have their kids entire lives on things like instagram - like ‘here is my three year old breastfeeding look how crunchy I am.’ Or ‘here are ten pics of my naked kids in the sea.’
And if you try to gently express that maybe such pics, along with literally hundreds of naked and intimate ones (emotionally intimate, like a child crying for example) might come back to bite them you are a ‘hater.’ Or a ‘prude.’ No, let your kids frolic naked in the sea, just don’t put pictures of them out in the public domain. They could be used and altered by people, or in future they be old used to mock or leverage your child. If you’re posting pics of kids in social media it should be very clean, bland stuff like ‘here were are smiling at a picnic.’ Nobody seems to think
Lots of cognitive dissonance when I explain this. It hurt some people’s brains when I explained that digital identity is important and I feel responsible to safeguard his privacy until he is old enough to properly consent and share what he wants. He can share his own poopy pictures later if he wants.

On the plus side, I think I convinced my sister not to be a mommy blogger ten years ago. My nephew doesn’t even know what horrid fate I saved him from.
 
Back
Top Bottom