💰 Grifter Devon Del Vecchio / "Dev" / ShortFatOtaku / @sleepy_devo - Degenerate loser, honorary whiteknight for Lilith Lovett, constantly at odds with his own viewers for being a centrist

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I get it, there's little to none official evidence against the democrats in these claims and regardless of the overall situation many protesters and rioters did storm the halls of congress.

Excuse me? What about those leaked clips of Feds/Antifas larping as Magas and being destructive little shits and then celebrating like they pulled a stunt to be used and even celebrating to the cameras? They were the ones who destroyed shit, the media just edited the footage to blame the Maga protesters, also the only gunfire was shot by the dems against Maga, those 6 assassinated? That veteran MAGA woman, Nigga CMON!
 
Jesus, nobody looks good here. Not Devon for replying "bro i'm totally normal and not insecure shut up!!!" nor the schizo faggots who keep screaming "YOU WANT TO FUCK FRANK UP THE ASS I KNOW IT THE WALLS TELL ME".
I seriously hope this thread dies, for everyone's sake.
He's a faggot who likes traps, but he won't fuck Lilith/Frank/whatever for whatever reason. They're just friends. Weirdos stick with weirdos. You don't automatically want to fuck your friends if they allign with your sexual preferences, unless you're some fucking incel who only sees women as holes.
END. OF.
Edit: what does the "mad at the internet" reaction mean?
Revisiting my old posts here and wow, what a giant faggot I was. He totally wanted to fuck the Chinese man, annoyed a bunch of his fans and he didn't even get to tap it.
Honestly, what's up with his circle and wanting to fuck trannies? His former best friend Scrump was also into them, although he actually managed to snag one. A horrific punishment for a normal person, but must've been an achievement in the eyes of Devon the Terminally Fat One.
 
Well last time there was one detractor from Arches discord and they didn't let him join. So this will be just another circlejerk session. Even first time this whole enterprise was wet fart and I doubt second time will be any better.
 
Excuse me? What about those leaked clips of Feds/Antifas larping as Magas and being destructive little shits and then celebrating like they pulled a stunt to be used and even celebrating to the cameras? They were the ones who destroyed shit, the media just edited the footage to blame the Maga protesters, also the only gunfire was shot by the dems against Maga, those 6 assassinated? That veteran MAGA woman, Nigga CMON!
Wait, where was it shown that the J6 rioters were actually feds/antifa doing a false flag? Or 6 people assassinated?
The most I've seen is the FBI statements that came out which many took to mean FBI were secretly in the crowd to start shit; but on actually reading the notes, turns out the FBI agents weren't in the crowd, but were brought from the nearby FBI HQ for crowd control, without being given crowd control material.
As for the deaths, from what I know, you only had Babbitt who was actually shot. Of the others, one was that Sicknick cop who died because of a blood clot or something, 1 guy who OD'd on amphetamines, and at least two others who died of heart attacks.
All in all, J6 was a basic bitch MAGA riot that the Dems/feds were unable to do much about at the time. Neither was it a "false flag op", not was it "an insurrection against the republic of the USA" as Dev might want to push (not including the fake electors thing because that is only tangentially related to this riot.)
 
Wait, where was it shown that the J6 rioters were actually feds/antifa doing a false flag?

Through FBI testimony. Mind you, we dont have anyone directly saying "Yes, we had agents in the crowd that stormed the capital."

But what we do have is several congresional hearings where under oath directors and high level people in the FBI are asked "Were there any undercover FBI agents in the Jan 6th crowd" and the answer has always been either "I don't know," or something along the lines of "We are not at liberty to discuss that." Same thing when directly questioned about Ray Epps, I've seen plenty of underoath testimony of "Can't comment" and "Don't know him" but never seen someone under oath say no yet.

Meaning as far as I'm aware we have no under oath testimony of a solid denial of agents but alot of non answers. Take that as you will. Personally, I see absolut
 
Meaning as far as I'm aware we have no under oath testimony of a solid denial of agents but alot of non answers. Take that as you will.
That's what I mean about "Official." There is circumstantial evidence as well as several things being off on examination. But nothing you can truly point to with a definitive stance. And Dev knows this.
 
There is circumstantial evidence as well as several things being off on examination.
Nah.

Otherwise how do you have select like Nick Fuentes and Ray Epps who, despite openly instigating, served no charges?

Or here's another one @Frag Tag Mini 3 : how about the fact majority wasn't even rioting due to the footage (that they refused to release mind you) that Tucker got a hold of?

Or the person with the pipebomb they just... couldn't get a hold of🙄
 
That's what I mean about "Official." There is circumstantial evidence as well as several things being off on examination. But nothing you can truly point to with a definitive stance. And Dev knows this.
Sure man. Im sure they have great reasons for trying to be vauge when trying to refute the greatest threat to the FBI's funding and credibility. I know the last time I was accused of violating federal law and was innocent I just decided to fuck around about it so I had something fun to do before lunch.
 
Nah.

Otherwise how do you have select like Nick Fuentes and Ray Epps who, despite openly instigating, served no charges?

Or here's another one @Frag Tag Mini 3 : how about the fact majority wasn't even rioting due to the footage (that they refused to release mind you) that Tucker got a hold of?

Or the person with the pipebomb they just... couldn't get a hold of🙄
You're not wrong, but the issue that comes up, especially in a debate setting, is that everything wrong with J6 is an non-falsefiable claim.

More specifically, while everything you've pointed to warrents investigation and looking into, none have been done until very recently. The most you can get in a debate is "Yeah, those are suspect, but nothing has happened yet and there's no investigation around them. So until we get a proper investigation, it's fair to say it could be nothing" Even with the protesters that were let in, the argument would be "That's why not everyone was arrested."

It's a blatant fucking trap to enter a heavily biased "debate" about J6 since it's fucking obvious that the questions will be about investigations and evidence that doesn't exist in part because "the FBI investigated itself and found nothing."

Is that stupid? Fuck yes it is. But that's how this shit goes.
 
The specter of D&D has returned to haunt Dev yet again:
1767919478176.png
(X/N/A)

Interestingly this time Sargon actually deigned to respond:
1767919569370.png

He's also dropped a video on Clav out of nowhere:

I've not watched it yet, anyone who frequents the thread can judge for themselves whether fats is talking out of his ass.
 
Another Dev vs the World stream, another chance for Dev to gloat:
View attachment 8388959
(X/N/A)
Among those he wants to draw into his gay spat are two people he insists that he's 'cut off' or 'walked away from' despite his repeated heel-nipping on twitter:
View attachment 8388972

I can't wait to see his inevitable victory lap when nobody shows up to this dead-air stream on some literally who's channel. Once again Dev's detractors will be vanquished and humiliated for all time.
Gayest fucking thumbnail I've ever seen.
 
Well, it would appear Dev has made up his mind about the shooting. And as a shock to no one, he's siding with the insane leftoids. Also, bit of an extra wide edit because I just thought it would be funny to include the fact "George Foid" is now trending.

Screenshot (150).png
 
The specter of D&D has returned to haunt Dev yet again:
View attachment 8393495
(X/N/A)

Interestingly this time Sargon actually deigned to respond:
View attachment 8393501

He's also dropped a video on Clav out of nowhere:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=pzdrSn8hRN0
I've not watched it yet, anyone who frequents the thread can judge for themselves whether fats is talking out of his ass.
Well Arch and Sargon already talked about Clavicular faggotry.
So social parasite is once again late and gay with his take even , by normie standards.
It was bad idea to let homosexual zoophile drama queen to join their D&D group in first place
 
View attachment 8398484
View attachment 8398486
Dev hanging out with Pedophiles.... again....

Blegh, not worth the pain after how those faggots curated the stream and always select workdays cause Dev knows his biggest detractors actually have functional lives and families even.

Also geez that picture, I am older then he is, and not nearly as fat as he, and look younger then he does because I don't smoke nor drink alcohol.
 
Back
Top Bottom