💰 Grifter Devon Del Vecchio / "Dev" / ShortFatOtaku / @sleepy_devo - Degenerate loser, honorary whiteknight for Lilith Lovett, constantly at odds with his own viewers for being a centrist

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
You know, the more I think about this the more I sorta wish it would happen. Not that I think Dev would win it or that whoever WhickTV is would be worth a damn at moderating. But only because of the absolute shit show it would be.

Sargon would show up. He'd be winning just by virtue of not being wasted on illicit drugs like Dev. Dev of course wpuld be monitoring chat wanting to feel super good about himself when the audiance recognizes him as a genious. And would then have a complete melt down as every one in chat overwhelms him with hate.

Would be funny.

Screenshot_20251030_132001_X.jpg
 
What would you guys say to reminding Dev that I offered to debate him every single time he requests someone else debate him?
 
Frag Tag Mini 3 said:
You know, the more I think about this the more I sorta wish it would happen. Not that I think Dev would win it or that whoever WhickTV is would be worth a damn at moderating. But only because of the absolute shit show it would be.

Sargon would show up. He'd be winning just by virtue of not being wasted on illicit drugs like Dev. Dev of course wpuld be monitoring chat wanting to feel super good about himself when the audiance recognizes him as a genious. And would then have a complete melt down as every one in chat overwhelms him with hate.

Would be funny.

View attachment 8101563
Click to expand...
It doesn't matter how badly Dev does, simply being opposed to Sargon would elevate Dev's profile, which is why he's been goading Sargon on Twitter for the past year. And Sargon does poorly in live, unscripted debates. He has a habit of laughing nervously when he's presented with abject retardation. That's what Dev would be going for, a clip of Sargon acting befuddled after Dev says something to 'own' him and/or the right.
 
Frag Tag Mini 3 said:
You know, the more I think about this the more I sorta wish it would happen. Not that I think Dev would win it or that whoever WhickTV is would be worth a damn at moderating. But only because of the absolute shit show it would be.

Sargon would show up. He'd be winning just by virtue of not being wasted on illicit drugs like Dev. Dev of course wpuld be monitoring chat wanting to feel super good about himself when the audiance recognizes him as a genious. And would then have a complete melt down as every one in chat overwhelms him with hate.

Would be funny.

View attachment 8101563
Click to expand...
If I was in Sargons place I would let one of my lotus eaters employees clip old SFO stuff where he talks about problems of mass migration. And during potential debate instead of making argument just play those clips instead . It would be funny to see 2025 SFO try to argue with 2017 SFO.
Ruby Ridge retard is too dumb to come up with new argument so he will just repeat generic progressive talking points.
 
ACE1918 said:
What would you guys say to reminding Dev that I offered to debate him every single time he requests someone else debate him?
Click to expand...
He'd never agree to, because he's chasing clout and only wants to go against larger channels to make a name for himself. Incidentally, he'd probably refuse the debate with you by accusing you of the very same. Like how Charlie Kirk refused to debate Nick Fuentes with the excuse of "I don't platform trolls".
 
Radola Gajda said:
If I was in Sargons place I would let one of my lotus eaters employees clip old SFO stuff where he talks about problems of mass migration. And during potential debate instead of making argument just play those clips instead . It would be funny to see 2025 SFO try to argue with 2017 SFO.
Ruby Ridge retard is too dumb to come up with new argument so he will just repeat generic progressive talking points.
Click to expand...
I would just have Beau or Josh debate him instead. They both know exactly what's going on with the grooming gangs, they could grow their own youtube channels using the debate, they wouldn't take any of Dev's shit like Sargon might because of past history, and Dev wouldn't be able to use any out of context statements from them like he would try to do with Sargon. It also denies Dev any clout chasing he might get using Sargon. Hell have Dan do it and destroy Dev solely on the economic impact.

In reality it's not worth any of their time to do so. Sargon runs what seems to be a successful company and his editors already have enough work on their hands. Harry has been working on a documentary for them on the Weimar Republic that the editors are handling. It's not worth debating some fat fucking bad faith Canadian who chases after Sargon like a jilted lover.
 
I don't know, I think if Dev bleats about it enough there's a small chance Arch might host something. In either case I suspect Sargon would try and approach it in a spirit of amity rather than as a full on debate. I doubt Dev would reciprocate and if anything would just try and take advantage of it.
 
Bâtard Consanguine said:
He'd never agree to, because he's chasing clout and only wants to go against larger channels to make a name for himself. Incidentally, he'd probably refuse the debate with you by accusing you of the very same. Like how Charlie Kirk refused to debate Nick Fuentes with the excuse of "I don't platform trolls".
Click to expand...
Maybe but then just ask about that response video. It is an excellent opportunity to troll and pressure him on that, both on him being a hypocrite by claiming the right are cowards for refusing to do debates and also on him taking so long on that video.
 
ACE1918 said:
Maybe but then just ask about that response video. It is an excellent opportunity to troll and pressure him on that, both on him being a hypocrite by claiming the right are cowards for refusing to do debates and also on him taking so long on that video.
Click to expand...
You do you ACE, but as far as cow-tipping goes I don't co-sign that necessarily.
 
ACE1918 said:
What would you guys say to reminding Dev that I offered to debate him every single time he requests someone else debate him?
Click to expand...
Some folks have said no due to cow tiping. I would remind anyone, doing something on X that you saw suggested in the farms would make it much easier for people to trace you from here. Remember opsec.
 
ACE1918 said:
This is a fair concern.
Click to expand...
Ace, I think you've done an excellent job of elucidating on why it's not worth it to even engage with Dev, at least not anymore. He won't ever listen to you, and anything he offers as a counter-argument ultimately amounts to a pedantic observation to the contrary rather than anything with real philosophical merit. Observing, and documenting Dev's activities is worth-while, but starving him of personal interaction is for the best at this point.
 
Bâtard Consanguine said:
He'd never agree to, because he's chasing clout and only wants to go against larger channels to make a name for himself. Incidentally, he'd probably refuse the debate with you by accusing you of the very same. Like how Charlie Kirk refused to debate Nick Fuentes with the excuse of "I don't platform trolls".
Click to expand...
Say what you will, but it's a very effective strategy.

It kept Nick in his mom's basement streaming on a backwater site for years and so far it's continued to make Dev look more and more like a desperate whore as he fades into the grifter dustbin.
 
Dev retweeted this quite mawkish bit of slop content fairly recently, he could have been doing it ironically to mock it but I'm going to choose the much more demeaning interpretation of his behavior in this case:
1762044053147.png
(X/N/A)

It's quite telling of his attitude if this is something he believes, after all he lives like a slovenly, self-indulgent hog slopping about in public view. I think even Naomi is likely less of a partner to him and more of an accessory to his fatness.
 
Laburnum said:
Dev retweeted this quite mawkish bit of slop content fairly recently, he could have been doing it ironically to mock it but I'm going to choose the much more demeaning interpretation of his behavior in this case:
View attachment 8111256
(X/N/A)

It's quite telling of his attitude if this is something he believes, after all he lives like a slovenly, self-indulgent hog slopping about in public view. I think even Naomi is likely less of a partner to him and more of an accessory to his fatness.
Click to expand...
It's funny that, when we see a fatass, we imagine all sorts of mishaps and weird things. Not necessarily degeneracy (until the advent of internet), yet the adjectives that can be applied to said persons.
If what I said doesn't make much sense, I will try to expand upon: imagine some random fat kid or fat man that you don't know. And he ha is clumsy or has weird manners. Even if you don't want to be mean to him or do any bullying, it's hard not to picture him falling and want to laugh, or imagine he is a point of hilarity.
 
Laburnum said:
Dev retweeted this quite mawkish bit of slop content fairly recently, he could have been doing it ironically to mock it but I'm going to choose the much more demeaning interpretation of his behavior in this case:
View attachment 8111256
(X/N/A)

It's quite telling of his attitude if this is something he believes, after all he lives like a slovenly, self-indulgent hog slopping about in public view. I think even Naomi is likely less of a partner to him and more of an accessory to his fatness.
Click to expand...
Good to see the replies are lambasting that for being a manifesto of narcissism. Did Jordan Peterson actually say that, or was that AI using the voice of an 'intellectual figure' to make self-indulgence sound more profound?
 
Bâtard Consanguine said:
Good to see the replies are lambasting that for being a manifesto of narcissism. Did Jordan Peterson actually say that, or was that AI using the voice of an 'intellectual figure' to make self-indulgence sound more profound?
Click to expand...
Almost certainly AI I think, the cadence sounded off to me and it doesn't seem like a Petersonian thing to say.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom