💰 Grifter Devon Del Vecchio / "Dev" / ShortFatOtaku / @sleepy_devo - Degenerate loser, honorary whiteknight for Lilith Lovett, constantly at odds with his own viewers for being a centrist

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
View attachment 7964221View attachment 7964222

More Dev burning bridges with Sargon, claiming it was over 'personal stuff' and not politics (lies, or is is really that salty over a goddamn D&D game?)
I wonder if this comes back to that whiny refrain of his. He's mentioned it in multiple seethes and there will be clips in earlier pages, but he's mentioned again and again that a group of other people showed him examples of interactions with Sargon and Vee and how they weren't treating him like a friend. I honestly don't believe him when he says this, I think he's just straight up lying.
 
I wonder if this comes back to that whiny refrain of his. He's mentioned it in multiple seethes and there will be clips in earlier pages, but he's mentioned again and again that a group of other people showed him examples of interactions with Sargon and Vee and how they weren't treating him like a friend. I honestly don't believe him when he says this, I think he's just straight up lying.
Dev is a self admitted narcissist, even at a time when he was more even in his thinking, it wouldn't surprise me if he saw the most mild of disagreements as a total relationship crisis, worthy of the wrath of God.
 
Dev is a self admitted narcissist, even at a time when he was more even in his thinking, it wouldn't surprise me if he saw the most mild of disagreements as a total relationship crisis, worthy of the wrath of God.
Which makes his relationship with Arch rather confusing. Arch is an avowed Trump supporter, going so far as to say anything the Trump does to destroy the left is justified. Dev meanwhile says anyone who so much as tacitly supports Trump is a reprobate. And that's just the ideological conflict, the personal conflict has been ongoing as Arch still demands Dev make specific videos before he'd be allowed back on the Archcast. Dev's downward spiral has been fueled in so small part to being spiteful to his own audience because they insisted upon certain things, Arch is being far more demanding than Dev's audience ever was. And despite all this, Dev still claims to be friends with Arch.
 
Which makes his relationship with Arch rather confusing. Arch is an avowed Trump supporter, going so far as to say anything the Trump does to destroy the left is justified. Dev meanwhile says anyone who so much as tacitly supports Trump is a reprobate. And that's just the ideological conflict, the personal conflict has been ongoing as Arch still demands Dev make specific videos before he'd be allowed back on the Archcast. Dev's downward spiral has been fueled in so small part to being spiteful to his own audience because they insisted upon certain things, Arch is being far more demanding than Dev's audience ever was. And despite all this, Dev still claims to be friends with Arch.
Oh, I might start watching Arch again then.
 
Testing? He merely issued edicts, claiming nature followed marxist doctrine and that 'survival of the fittest' was capitalist propaganda, which meant that anyone who objected were sent to the gulag.
Right, I may have simplified it, but that was the gist of it.
Dev is a self admitted narcissist, even at a time when he was more even in his thinking, it wouldn't surprise me if he saw the most mild of disagreements as a total relationship crisis, worthy of the wrath of God.
I'd assume he's a sociopath, but too weak to act upon it. If someone finally picked up Micro for a beating, he would be howling and shitting himself.
 
Which makes his relationship with Arch rather confusing. Arch is an avowed Trump supporter, going so far as to say anything the Trump does to destroy the left is justified. Dev meanwhile says anyone who so much as tacitly supports Trump is a reprobate. And that's just the ideological conflict, the personal conflict has been ongoing as Arch still demands Dev make specific videos before he'd be allowed back on the Archcast. Dev's downward spiral has been fueled in so small part to being spiteful to his own audience because they insisted upon certain things, Arch is being far more demanding than Dev's audience ever was. And despite all this, Dev still claims to be friends with Arch.

Arch was using Dev to get Hatechats, i said before that he was as snake too.

Welp, we are now at 50 pages after the 300th and Dev did NEVER released any of the promised videos.
 
Arch was using Dev to get Hatechats, i said before that he was as snake too.

Welp, we are now at 50 pages after the 300th and Dev did NEVER released any of the promised videos.
Total Dev-tractor victory;
1758942408827.webp


(sauce: https://x.com/sleepy_devo/status/1971601932474257817)
 
View attachment 7967004
This would be self-destructive behavior if making videos was just a hobby, that his entire livelihood is based around content creation and he's willing to throw it all away out of spite is utter insanity.
I feel like I remember saying it a long ass time ago, that his whole deal has been the inverse of audience capture. He would rather go hard against his perceived influential portion of his audience, than be "captured" by them. The issue with all this is how loudly he goes about it and how it has caused his viewpoint to stagnate.

I like to argue politics, and whether its with someone more left, or more right, than myself, I am very much willing to come from a perspective of actually trying to understand the argument. I might not agree with whatever dumb argument, but it does my own perspective better to understand why one would use it.

Dev has hit a point, and ultimately been stuck there for some blurry amount of time, where he refuses to try and understand. He might say he understands, or is willing to try and understand, before throwing all that out and just call people "evil" or "retarded" etc. For someone who made his whole channel on being seemingly able to explain topics, usually with arguments from both sides being discussed, he has become wholly stuck in the idea that giving any credit to one side is suddenly wrong. It's mind poison.
 
So what is his plan when this all fails? I mean he knows there's a very real chance youtube stops being able to provide. He openly sates he'd rather fail as a youtuber than change. So he knows that could happen. So what does he plan to do when he fi naly loses revenue either from irrelevance or saying something so stupid he gets booted?
 
So what is his plan when this all fails? I mean he knows there's a very real chance youtube stops being able to provide. He openly sates he'd rather fail as a youtuber than change. So he knows that could happen. So what does he plan to do when he fi naly loses revenue either from irrelevance or saying something so stupid he gets booted?
I think his plan B is : Leech off the Cucknadian welfare system . And pray that he does not get MAiDed.
 
I think his plan B is : Leech off the Cucknadian welfare system . And pray that he does not get MAiDed.
That is the Balldo of Riketokels, I mean, Sword of Damocles that hangs of his head. He may or may not get MAiDed, so he will try his best to toe the line.
But being a midwit, he won't consider the consequences.
 
I've been thinking a lot about the way liberals/leftists and people like SFO use the term "evil," because what they consider evil seems so alien to what most people in the world would consider it.
In general it tends to come from religious feelings. Evil is what your religion tells you is evil. Otherwise, if it's antisocial behavior that your religion doesn't say is necessarily evil, it's just "bad."
Liberals like SFO that are in the woke religion (and he is a Believer whether he wants to admit it or not) seem to have a reverse view of what is commonly attributed to evil vs bad.
Things like racism or even just loving your own people (if you're white), chauvinism, flirtatious or rude behavior are seen as Evil, while murder, rape, thievery, lying, adultery, etc are just seen as "bad."
Most things religious people would see as good are often seen as Evil by woke people too. The sanctity of life itself, patriotism, loving your neighbor before others, being pious and spreading gospel, being honest with yourself and those around you, being healthy and treating your body right, being non-violent, being against things that lead to social disorder. These are all seen as sins and evil in wokism, and as much as SFO tries to pretend he's not, he follows all of that bullshit like a religion.

I really wonder where it all even comes from, besides some kind of anti-Christian (but also anti-all world religious belief) contrarianism.
 
I've been thinking a lot about the way liberals/leftists and people like SFO use the term "evil," because what they consider evil seems so alien to what most people in the world would consider it.
In general it tends to come from religious feelings. Evil is what your religion tells you is evil. Otherwise, if it's antisocial behavior that your religion doesn't say is necessarily evil, it's just "bad."
Liberals like SFO that are in the woke religion (and he is a Believer whether he wants to admit it or not) seem to have a reverse view of what is commonly attributed to evil vs bad.
Things like racism or even just loving your own people (if you're white), chauvinism, flirtatious or rude behavior are seen as Evil, while murder, rape, thievery, lying, adultery, etc are just seen as "bad."
Most things religious people would see as good are often seen as Evil by woke people too. The sanctity of life itself, patriotism, loving your neighbor before others, being pious and spreading gospel, being honest with yourself and those around you, being healthy and treating your body right, being non-violent, being against things that lead to social disorder. These are all seen as sins and evil in wokism, and as much as SFO tries to pretend he's not, he follows all of that bullshit like a religion.

I really wonder where it all even comes from, besides some kind of anti-Christian (but also anti-all world religious belief) contrarianism.
I think it's a knee-jerk emotional thing for him. In one of the recent seethe streams he did describe MAGA types as evil, before walking it back slightly. I think he probably means their intentions and the outcomes they want are unambiguously bad or harmful (by his reckoning), therefore = evil.
 
I really wonder where it all even comes from, besides some kind of anti-Christian (but also anti-all world religious belief) contrarianism.
Yes, postmodernism is taught in school and the fruits of it is Critical Race Theory and Howard Zinn history, but that's taught to everyone and not everyone becomes a scumbag. Modern-day Leftism attracts people with Dark Triad traits. Dark Triad people are just rotten to begin with.
 
Back
Top Bottom