💰 Grifter Devon Del Vecchio / "Dev" / ShortFatOtaku / @sleepy_devo - Degenerate loser, honorary whiteknight for Lilith Lovett, constantly at odds with his own viewers for being a centrist

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
BigGuyOS 6 : Jovial Janny said:
It's now a Members only video. Did anyone clip?
Click to expand...
Unfortunately, no.
In other news, ACE1918 strikes again.

Episode 24 of the ShortFatOtaku Lolcow Anime.
At this point, anyone saying ACE is grifting and milking the drama is stupid, because Dev is milking his own drama. This is the norm here, we don't have grounds to complain about anyone who makes regular videos covering Dev's retardation when Dev is being a retard 24/7.
 
liam dees said:
Late you are my friend. Also the guy who made this is in the thread lmao
Click to expand...
jessiedrinking.gif
ummmmm ahhhhhhh ummmmmmmmm oh jeez oh G-d oh fuck ummmmmm
 
DaleMcGuy said:
This happens every time with these YouTuber types and they never see the hypocrisy.
Click to expand...
Kirsche was one of those. She welcomed him to her community even after 90% of her community being against it and the 9% not knowing who him is.

While I like kirsche a lot, people like her and SmashJT only learn when they fail as they have shown many times where they ignored/don't trust most of their community and gets one-guyed by grifters like dev
 
liam dees said:
Unfortunately, no.
In other news, ACE1918 strikes again.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=WKZJEFrLY-0
Episode 24 of the ShortFatOtaku Lolcow Anime.
At this point, anyone saying ACE is grifting and milking the drama is stupid, because Dev is milking his own drama. This is the norm here, we don't have grounds to complain about anyone who makes regular videos covering Dev's retardation when Dev is being a retard 24/7.
Click to expand...
The video is done premiering.
We need to archive that longer clip of Dev in this video. This is a mask off moment from Dev. He basically said, Not In My Backyard in regards to off platform behavior done by possible pedophiles hiding in his community. Even though banning said predators would actually protect his server members and wash his hands clean of any illicit activity those predators could have done without him knowing.
Also he makes the exceptional statement that banning pedophiles creates a slippery slope where you can ban people for committing any crime outside of his Discord server's jurisdiction, namely bringing up shoplifters as an example.

https://rumble.com/v5uycj5--the-weekly-sip-for-december-1st-2024.html?start=7703
https://kick.com/shortfatotaku/videos/801f7808-f8a3-42dc-abff-101b062d32f7?t=7695
 
liam dees said:
Also he makes the exceptional statement that banning pedophiles creates a slippery slope where you can ban people for committing any crime outside of his Discord server's jurisdiction, namely bringing up shoplifters as an example.

https://rumble.com/v5uycj5--the-weekly-sip-for-december-1st-2024.html?start=7703
https://kick.com/shortfatotaku/videos/801f7808-f8a3-42dc-abff-101b062d32f7?t=7695
Click to expand...
Alright guys, let's do a thought experiment. I assume most of you run, or are part of, a small group chat with your boys. Let's say, someone brings someone else in, and you let them. But, you learn something, that person has done "Something" somewhere (i.e. these are actions they've taken BEFORE, not differences in personality, or worldview, or things they do in your server), that makes you not want to associate with them and you consider removing them from the group chat. What are the list of those "somethings" that that event would have to be to illicit that reaction. As usual, I'll start.

-had or have attempted to have inappropriate contact with children
-has expressed desires to do above
-has killed, or attempted to kill someone in cold blood (i.e. not self defense)
-Is British, Canadian, or Australian

Point being, I don't think there's much of a slippery slope to worry about here.
 
AWarmToiletSeat said:
Alright guys, let's do a thought experiment. I assume most of you run, or are part of, a small group chat with your boys. Let's say, someone brings someone else in, and you let them. But, you learn something, that person has done "Something" somewhere (i.e. these are actions they've taken BEFORE, not differences in personality, or worldview, or things they do in your server), that makes you not want to associate with them and you consider removing them from the group chat. What are the list of those "somethings" that that event would have to be to illicit that reaction. As usual, I'll start.

-had or have attempted to have inappropriate contact with children
-has expressed desires to do above
-has killed, or attempted to kill someone in cold blood (i.e. not self defense)
-Is British, Canadian, or Australian

Point being, I don't think there's much of a slippery slope to worry about here.
Click to expand...
I fucking hate Dev so much, his proclamation of being well read mirrors those with doctorates in "olfactory politics".
He doesn't even understand the slippery slope as a concept.
 
JesterTheMad said:
/Pol/ randomly hating on Dev on a thread hating on Boomers. No idea why...

TL;DR
Dev is so fat and gay, even /pol/ hating on him.

If some one wants to see the thread:
Click to expand...

I get what the Argie is saying, and it makes sense. Dev is suffering from a similar ill to James Lindsay which caused him to have that meltdown about the "woke right" a little back: They have all the evidence, explanation, theory and proof but still REFUSE to budge from being shitlibs and remains stuck in late 1990/early 2000 political landscape. You can see this the most plainly in Dev by contrasting the video where he speaks of Gramsci's non-stop revolution and push for cultural hegemony of "Everything is political!" and then a few videos later he will see woke devs pushing DEI shit on games and BudLight using trannies to advertise and he will back off and insist it is "just incompetence guys, not malice. We shouldn't fight on their own terms and try and push a boycott. It's really just a accident!"
 
General Emílio Médici said:
a similar ill to James Lindsay which caused him to have that meltdown about the "woke right" a little back
Click to expand...
That is an ongoing saga. A spectacle for the ages. "Wait, you guys were actually right wing? I thought we could just go back to the 90s where we could throw away billions of dollars in the middle east and ruin the market so our corporate friends."
 
“I have receipts!”
Ah yes dev, like you do for the truckers? How is that video going by the way?
 
General Emílio Médici said:
I get what the Argie is saying, and it makes sense. Dev is suffering from a similar ill to James Lindsay which caused him to have that meltdown about the "woke right" a little back: They have all the evidence, explanation, theory and proof but still REFUSE to budge from being shitlibs and remains stuck in late 1990/early 2000 political landscape. You can see this the most plainly in Dev by contrasting the video where he speaks of Gramsci's non-stop revolution and push for cultural hegemony of "Everything is political!" and then a few videos later he will see woke devs pushing DEI shit on games and BudLight using trannies to advertise and he will back off and insist it is "just incompetence guys, not malice. We shouldn't fight on their own terms and try and push a boycott. It's really just a accident!"
Click to expand...
It's been kind of a trip to me that you can see really clearly from some people that they've never been able to adapt to the paradigms. A lot of people I know that I helped cut my teeth politically alongside and aren't nucking futs have this weird mindset where they still act like the political landscape is the exact same as it was in 1999 - the Dems are still the counterculture in their eyes, all the Repubs are still Neocons, and so on.

The political landscape we live in now isn't the same one we had last year, let alone two or so decades ago, but they've remained sort of frozen in time. I don't know how else to explain it.
 
AWarmToiletSeat said:
It's not good that we have to document and archive the misdeeds of shitty people. If this thread goes dead, hopefully that would mean there's nothing worth documenting anymore.

Which would be a good thing.
Click to expand...
If the thread dies it means Dev woke up and fixed his life. Which would be a good thing. I remember at times with this thread specifically it almost didn't move at all because, at the time, it seemed like Dev WAS fixing his shit. That objectively is good. It means the people around him aren't getting hurt and he's being less of a asshole.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom