- Joined
- Jan 11, 2024
That's his "Short Flat Loli" avitar from one of his April Fool's videos.
💰 Grifter Devon Del Vecchio / "Dev" / ShortFatOtaku / @sleepy_devo - Degenerate loser, honorary whiteknight for Lilith Lovett, constantly at odds with his own viewers for being a centrist
- Thread starter Burning Fanatic
- Start date
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
What is there to even understand? He jerks off to trannies and he consumes video game slop. His politics can be condensed into "what will preserve my supply of trannies and games?" Thinking about it, he is pretty much exactly how Null describes Destiny.
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2024
Really off-topic, but Disney managed to lose the original Brazilian dub, which also happened to be the first dub made in the country, so it was a little cultural artifact we no longer have. The one that is available is the redub they did 20 years later, with a different cast.
FurbusCuckus
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2024
Well OK, by ''original latino dub'' i meant to say the one recorded on 1964, which has only been preserved via piracy of the old VHS and the best version was taken from a 95 Laserdisc, there was the 1938 one recorded in the US, but that only survives in a very incomplete form taken from many sources, and its most likely its original materials were long gone destroyed.
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2022
Chris Chan got his girlfriend pregnant before Dev did. What a future we live in.
FurbusCuckus
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2024
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
Well despite Chris being trans, he never was gay in the conventical sense, he always wanted to pound China, not man ass like Dev.
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2022
Show us the proof they were hired based on racial and diversity quotas Dev. Like how Harris was picked as VP literally just because Biden promised to get a black woman VP or his SCOTUS pick for the same explicit reason.
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2019
If this is an ironic joke I'm sorry for being retarded and not understanding.
If it isn't, you should know that Dev admitted in a video before to getting a vasectomy because he decided he "never wants kids". I think it was in one of his videos about r/childfree and anti-natalism. While he tries to cope and pretend he chose to come to the rational(TM) scientific(TM) conclusion that he doesn't want children because he personally doesn't feel like he is the kind of person who wants to have kids, it's more likely because the responsibility of being a father would interfere with his ability to goon over trannies and play Nintendo games all day.
So luckily for the human species the gene pool will never have to suffer his contribution.
If he ever did have a kid with Naomi it would be a HAPA so who knows, maybe he's actually doing it out of a service to humanity to avoid another Elliot Rodgers situation (jk).
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2020
Could be he also chose the Centrist option between trooning out and having fertility by going for the vascetomy. Essentially, he is a eunuch. Combined with his general lack of masculine values and I definitely wouldn't call him a man in any sense.
Dev did a weekly sip today and then unlisted it. I don't have time to watch much of it, but from the bits I skimmed
-Talks about how he and Naomi physically strike each other a lot but it's ok because they agreed to the boundaries early in their relationship. Describes it as mild but enough that some others may consider it abuse
-Talks about friends and how everyone backstabs him. He would reconnect with some (Sargon, Kirsche) if they apologized to him.
-Goes to Arch's comment section to whine about how people shit on him. They have no real arguments against him or just throw insults.
-Talks about how he and Naomi physically strike each other a lot but it's ok because they agreed to the boundaries early in their relationship. Describes it as mild but enough that some others may consider it abuse
-Talks about friends and how everyone backstabs him. He would reconnect with some (Sargon, Kirsche) if they apologized to him.
-Goes to Arch's comment section to whine about how people shit on him. They have no real arguments against him or just throw insults.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
It was more of the usual cope from him. I'm not wrong, Vee and Sargon conspired against me and now I have a grudge against them! Ace is just a jilted ex lover and takes things out of context! Why is my viewcount for the sips so low? I know I've been in a constant fight with my viewers for the past 3 years, but you guys shoul donate more! It's just the same shit.
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2024
You guys have to watch the stream from 5: 57 to around 8: 00. Dev gives "his side" of the story between him and Ace. If you haven't guessed there is a lot of astroturfing involved, the chat and Naomi are Dev's yes men throughout the clip.
Just another instance of the Echo Chamber Dev created at work.
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2024
I was just gonna upload the clip from Dev's stream, but this became an Effortpost. Whoops, enjoy reading lol.
I spoilered the effortposting part for those who have no time to read that shit. TL;DR below.
Le Effortpost - Dev Retard Edition
I don't want the clips to disappear off the internet, so I clipped Dev's words on Ace myself. This is so Dev can't accuse me of lying in my earlier post.
He is such a smarmy guy.
I spoilered the effortposting part for those who have no time to read that shit. TL;DR below.
Le Effortpost - Dev Retard Edition
I don't want the clips to disappear off the internet, so I clipped Dev's words on Ace myself. This is so Dev can't accuse me of lying in my earlier post.
He is such a smarmy guy.
Choice Quotes:
The first three quotes amount to "rent free" arguments. This is exactly how Twitter users argue, which makes complete sense, considering who we are talking about. Since Dev does not have redeeming qualities that show him to be the superior content creator, I can easily discard these arguments.
An interesting point I'd like to make in regards to quote 3 though, is two-fold. Firstly, "one in a million" is a hilarious expose of the ego these people have. No, Naomi, yourboyfriend cuckold is not famous enough to garner that much hatred. Secondly, if there WERE a million haters making anti-Dev videos... you would be screwed out the algorithm, and out of the income Dev frankly doesn't deserve. Either way you sound very stupid saying this, Naomi.
Quote four is really ironic. He talks big about how ACE always had a right to criticize Dev. I suppose he also had the right to suffer your consequences for criticizing him? It's always the same with fake free speech advocates. There is always that "but..." that must be adhered to, being actual hard-hitting criticism of the advocates themselves.
Next come quotes five, six, and seven. With every quote there is corresponding evidence of the events described that are left out of context to fit Dev's narrative of ACE.
Take quote five, for instance. Did it occur to anyone watching the clip why ACE would commentate on Dev's channel at the time? Could it be perhaps, that at this time around four years ago, Dev had yet to contradict his liberal principles flagrantly and actually analyzed the right and the left in a fair manner? And could it be that during this time, being a much smaller channel, Dev actually committed to a consistent and high-quality upload schedule, resulting in many people looking up to Dev as a good content creator? Could it also be, in the midst of becoming a more popular channel, that Dev's channel was demonetized and his chance of success on YouTube was briefly squandered?
These are, of course, not hypothetical questions but what really happened at that time. It was this set of circumstances that would lead people like ACE, who was also in the pursuit of free speech and finding success in YouTube, to want to support and encourage him. That's why you had people supporting you Dev. Regardless of the sperging on /cow/, KiwiFarms or Twitter, they saw a jewel in the rough in your content. They likely didn't see your sperging, which would help a lot too. In other words, you brought (mostly) good content to the niche you were in at the time. Now, not so much.
In regards to quotes six and seven, these statements are outright contradicted by ACE's videos where he reads out your Tweets in response to him VERBATIM. There is substantiated proof, PUBLIC proof, where you acted the exact way you accuse ACE of acting. ACE was not nearly as "rude" as you claim. Every time he called you out it was like, "Hey, remember when you said this? Why are you saying that instead now?" along with a LINK to the tweet where you indeed said "this" and not "that".
When I examine ACE's positions against Dev's positions, I notice that ACE's position that The Hunter Biden Laptop fiasco was election manipulation done by the Democrats has not changed in years and has been backed by ACE using numerous past elections along with detailed explanations of how these historical attempts to steal the election were, in fact, election fraud. This is laid out in a few videos. Meanwhile, Dev originally acknowledged the Hunter Biden Laptop fiasco but claimed it was not election fraud because it "failed", meanwhile swearing up and down that The Eastman Memo was a coup attempt, despite it also failing to "steal" the election. Which is it Dev? Later on Dev even actively changes his definition of election fraud to exclude the Hunter Biden laptop story. He even briefly said that The Eastman Memo was not election fraud! Only to go back on that statement hours later. Who between the two is more trustworthy? ACE or Dev? You decide.
Quote eight is the most bad faith of them all. "Dev is evil", need I say more? Besides, ACE already revealed the truth of The Final Conversation between them in his "Dev is Ontologically Evil" video, which was that ACE never treated his opposition to Dev's beliefs as something irreconcilable, whereas Dev was the one to end things off on a sour note BECAUSE he was being beaten in the debate.
Quote nine. Projection. Dev, you have literally degenerated as a content creator for the past year. You have lost thousands of subscribers, your detractors are outpacing you in channel performance and growth, your own friend group is slowly turning their backs on you. These things are happening to you for a reason. Wake up, or don't, because fueling this thread is the best thing you can do right now.
Effortpost end.
- "butthurt former fanboy lul"
- "ace's "obsessed" with making videos on me, his Twitter feed is all me", naomi: "How does it feel to be loved?"
- naomi: so one out of a million? (in reference to ace being an "anti-dev" channel)
- "obviously i'm not perfect, obviously i make mistakes, he can critique me, it's his right"
- "ace used to commentate on what I was doing, and that's how we became mutuals"
- "as biden's presidency continued, lots of RWers radicalized, including ace, he became ruder and his arguments became more bad faith"
- "we would chat once in a while, and it would just get harder to talk to him, and I was just like, why am I putting myself through this, and so I cut him off"
- "at one of these debates, it was clear that Ace was moving into the "Dev, you are EVIL" camp, and I was like, I'm out"
- "it's been a year, and he is still fucking mad about it"
The first three quotes amount to "rent free" arguments. This is exactly how Twitter users argue, which makes complete sense, considering who we are talking about. Since Dev does not have redeeming qualities that show him to be the superior content creator, I can easily discard these arguments.
An interesting point I'd like to make in regards to quote 3 though, is two-fold. Firstly, "one in a million" is a hilarious expose of the ego these people have. No, Naomi, your
Quote four is really ironic. He talks big about how ACE always had a right to criticize Dev. I suppose he also had the right to suffer your consequences for criticizing him? It's always the same with fake free speech advocates. There is always that "but..." that must be adhered to, being actual hard-hitting criticism of the advocates themselves.
Next come quotes five, six, and seven. With every quote there is corresponding evidence of the events described that are left out of context to fit Dev's narrative of ACE.
Take quote five, for instance. Did it occur to anyone watching the clip why ACE would commentate on Dev's channel at the time? Could it be perhaps, that at this time around four years ago, Dev had yet to contradict his liberal principles flagrantly and actually analyzed the right and the left in a fair manner? And could it be that during this time, being a much smaller channel, Dev actually committed to a consistent and high-quality upload schedule, resulting in many people looking up to Dev as a good content creator? Could it also be, in the midst of becoming a more popular channel, that Dev's channel was demonetized and his chance of success on YouTube was briefly squandered?
These are, of course, not hypothetical questions but what really happened at that time. It was this set of circumstances that would lead people like ACE, who was also in the pursuit of free speech and finding success in YouTube, to want to support and encourage him. That's why you had people supporting you Dev. Regardless of the sperging on /cow/, KiwiFarms or Twitter, they saw a jewel in the rough in your content. They likely didn't see your sperging, which would help a lot too. In other words, you brought (mostly) good content to the niche you were in at the time. Now, not so much.
In regards to quotes six and seven, these statements are outright contradicted by ACE's videos where he reads out your Tweets in response to him VERBATIM. There is substantiated proof, PUBLIC proof, where you acted the exact way you accuse ACE of acting. ACE was not nearly as "rude" as you claim. Every time he called you out it was like, "Hey, remember when you said this? Why are you saying that instead now?" along with a LINK to the tweet where you indeed said "this" and not "that".
When I examine ACE's positions against Dev's positions, I notice that ACE's position that The Hunter Biden Laptop fiasco was election manipulation done by the Democrats has not changed in years and has been backed by ACE using numerous past elections along with detailed explanations of how these historical attempts to steal the election were, in fact, election fraud. This is laid out in a few videos. Meanwhile, Dev originally acknowledged the Hunter Biden Laptop fiasco but claimed it was not election fraud because it "failed", meanwhile swearing up and down that The Eastman Memo was a coup attempt, despite it also failing to "steal" the election. Which is it Dev? Later on Dev even actively changes his definition of election fraud to exclude the Hunter Biden laptop story. He even briefly said that The Eastman Memo was not election fraud! Only to go back on that statement hours later. Who between the two is more trustworthy? ACE or Dev? You decide.
Quote eight is the most bad faith of them all. "Dev is evil", need I say more? Besides, ACE already revealed the truth of The Final Conversation between them in his "Dev is Ontologically Evil" video, which was that ACE never treated his opposition to Dev's beliefs as something irreconcilable, whereas Dev was the one to end things off on a sour note BECAUSE he was being beaten in the debate.
Quote nine. Projection. Dev, you have literally degenerated as a content creator for the past year. You have lost thousands of subscribers, your detractors are outpacing you in channel performance and growth, your own friend group is slowly turning their backs on you. These things are happening to you for a reason. Wake up, or don't, because fueling this thread is the best thing you can do right now.
Effortpost end.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
More Ace content on Dev's livestream comments. Turning out breakdown videos in less than 24 hours is why Ace is Dev's greatest hater.
Video:
Video:
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2024
LMAO!
ACE1918 finally addressed the "clout chasing / milking drama" allegations... and GIGACHADS it. He literally says he has made boatloads off Dev's retardation
Afterwards he says he is taking a hiatus from Dev drama and making gaming videos whoch he says is his lifeblood.
He can't stop winning bros. ACE1918 is a certified Chad.
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2020
Dev says at one point that there are less Dev haters around at the moment, whilst devoting more and more time to seething about them, to the point that he spends the better part of a stream doing it. Also the schemer Uzalu is also allegedly responsible for stirring up more Dev hatred:
Dev provides further details on his side of the D&D campaign implosion:
Dev gives details on the aftermath of D&D and his split from Vee/Sargon. Apparently they would push opinions on him, constantly interrupt him, not give him time to speak and would put words in his mouth. Interrupting and talking over people? I wonder who that reminds me of...
Dev provides further details on his side of the D&D campaign implosion:
Dev gives details on the aftermath of D&D and his split from Vee/Sargon. Apparently they would push opinions on him, constantly interrupt him, not give him time to speak and would put words in his mouth. Interrupting and talking over people? I wonder who that reminds me of...
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2024
The thing about Uzalu is that the reason he became a person non grata was because Dev was not maintaining the Minercraft server that he opened up for his community. Uzalu basically hacked the server to try and get Dev to get off his ass and fix the server. In Uzalu's own words, "I raped his Minecraft blocks".
So yeah, all it takes is fucking with Dev's Minecraft blocks to get you banned from his community.
FurbusCuckus
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2024
The one that got invaded by pedos and shitstireers and Scrump was trying to warn Dev? but the latter pulled a TurkeyTom and was too fat n lazy to do its job and clean things up? so he went crying to daddy Sargon about it and since then he brainfarted in his mind the narrative of ''LE WEVIL SCRUMPA LEAKING STUFF AND DOXXING PEOPLE''