💼 Careercow Devin J. Stone / LegalEagle - Agenda-driven armchair lawyer who uses his politically charged videos to push his ideology, but holds the power to kill the Trump administration through lawsuits

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1769442409708.png
Again, if ICE is so unqualified, something these people have been saying for weeks now, why are all of these "protestors" being goaded into publicly confronting them?
You'd think that if every time someone interacted with an ICE agent their life was in danger there'd be some kind of call to stop interacting with them, or at least be careful.
But no, get aggressive, attack them, then get shot I guess.
 
harbringer883 said:
There is something so perfect about this image lmfao
View attachment 8476478
Buck broken.
Click to expand...
The TDS grind must be so exausting— you always have to be on because Trump or ICE or RFK or whoever is always doing something that is "unprecedented" and "threatens the very foundation of our democracy". And your side can't take credit for anything good because if they could that would mean they are responsible for the burning, looting, and murder in the aftermath.
Countdown until this video?
Screenshot_20260126-105847.png
 
Russian Bot #5361 said:
Likely he meant that the suspect was unarmed at the time of the shooting, the footage showed that one of the officers, prior to the shooting, had disarmed the suspect. So it's not at all incorrect to say the victim was unarmed when shot.
Click to expand...
This happens every now and again and is always entirely dishonest. There was another case a while back where an armed suspend was told to drop the gun, and so he made a quick motion to throw the gun and was shot 0.2 seconds later. Without the ability to see into the future they had no way to tell the guy was surrendering in a supremely retarded way. Technically he was shot "while unarmed" because he had just thrown the gun 1/5th of a second ago, but anyone who says he was unarmed is full of shit. None of them would say "shot moments after being disarmed" because they know that saying something that's blatantly false but can be twisted into something that's technically true will get the most people the most mad.

Anyway there has to be some sort of curse for Youtube lawyers because they're all batshit insane grifters. Maybe that's the true nature of the layer on full display.
 
WelperHelper99 said:
Why did he go outside to film? It's so performative. He even did up his hair to go talk in the frost. This man gets fucked in the ass on the daily by his bull.
Click to expand...
He went outside because the cold would make his face red and make his eyes water,

It was to help him fake cry.
 
didelphigina said:
real lawyer would actually diversify what they talk about. LegalEagle's whole shtick is "orange man bad and his evil fascist actions reviewed by a very legitimate lawyer who's only career as a lawyer is being a lawyer that likes being told he's a lawyer".
Click to expand...
A real lawyer would stray away from talking too much and too passionately about things outside their practice. Yeah, if you do M&A work, entertainment work, regulatory work, etc. I understand why you would speak a lot about the Warner Bros merger drama. And if you do a lot of commercial law/UCC work, I understand why you would speak a lot about crypto as a legally recognized asset. If you do qualified/federal immunity work, immigration law, or even criminal prosecution/defense work, then I can understand you speaking about some of the deaths from ICE officers in Minnesota.

But Legal Eagle is not these things. I can give a sliver of acknowledgment that he has some experience in federal law enforcement from the prosecution side, but that was a long time ago and not for long enough to be considered an expert by any measure. He's about as reputable on this subject as Nick Rekieta—maybe less since Rekieta at one point was fully licensed to practice in Minnesota.
 
Lasagna4Dead said:
Pretty sure he changed the title of the video to make it seem like he was more emotionally invested, iirc it used to say something along the lines of "ice executed this man" to the current title today, I hate when fag youtubers do this, a great example of this is Kenny lauderdale changing his video thumbnail and video title every 2-3 months hoping people will watch him.
Click to expand...
Doing that apparently helps you stay in the algorithm, or so I've heard.

Which is weird, because I routinely get 10+ year old videos recommended to me on my YouTube home page.
 
Manual reminder that jewsh thought this homo was a heccxin' valid lawyerman because he wears a suit just like the ones in the movies.
 
I haven't watched any of this faggot's videos in a long while. Shame how much he's fallen into TDS.

Regarding the recent ICE stuff, has LE given any exceedingly retarded legal advice on how to deal with ICE yet? Example- "If ICE tells you to do X, you don't legally have to since they're not police." Stuff like that.
 
I await the inevitable when his mind truly breaks, he sees the system is beyond redemption and we get the rise of the Legal Deagle.

Legal Deagle 1.jpg
(made with Grok AI)
 
I remember that Devin very publicly and rather concernedly announced that he and his fellow attorney parasites had filed for some sort of official investigation into Donald Trump and his passe in what I believe to have been around the time that the whole business with Trumps alleged (I'm not up to speed about this) mishandling of governmental documents and storage of said documents in Mar-a-Lago.

Did anything come of this?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom