Disaster Democrats Literally Murder First Ever Transgender Candidate - Known Right Wing Shill Hillary Clinton Approves

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Hillary Clinton, well known for her neoconservative views and warmongering has descended from her ivory tower to inform her stooge Tom Perez who is first up on her kill list:

http://www.dailywire.com/news/22453/party-inclusivity-democrats-slam-door-first-ever-ryan-saavedra#

The Democratic National Committee began purging members in its progressive-wing on Wednesday for their opposition to DNC Chairman Tom Perez — a Clinton loyalist.

The move, reported by NBC News, comes after the DNC endured a brutal primary battle between Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton in 2016 — a battle that fractured a party already in ruins.

Perez’s decision to remove and demote numerous far-left members of the DNC is alarming to many Democrats who see the move as a way of overstocking the DNC with Clinton-backed members on the Rules and Bylaws Committee, “which helps set the terms for the party's presidential primary.”

For a political party that supposedly prides itself on being “inclusive” the DNC did a lousy job at showing that. Not only did they oust the president of the Arab American Institute, they also booted the first-ever transgender member of the DNC, along with several others.

“James Zogby, the president of the Arab American Institute and prominent Sanders backer, is no longer co-chair of the Resolutions Committee and is off the Executive Committee, a spot he has held since 2001,” NBC News reported. “Barbra Casbar Siperstein, the first transgender member of the DNC who supported Ellison and Buckley, was tossed from the Executive Committee.”

“I can’t speak for Tom (Perez), but you talk about diversity — I’m extremely diverse: Jewish, veteran, transgender, lesbian, grandparent, small-business owner,” Siperstein said.

The DNC purge also followed Wednesday’s news that the GOP fundraising is booming at a historic rate, the Republican National Committee raising over $100 million in just the first nine months of 2017 — while the fundraising for the DNC is tanking.

The Democratic Party is in complete disarray, having lost over “1,042 state and federal Democratic posts, including congressional and state legislative seats, governorships and the presidency,” Fox News reported.
 
Well give me an example of who'd you like to be the face of the party? I'm thinking of the people that you're implying and um... I have extremely mixed feelings...

Eugene Debs risen from the dead.

debs.jpg


Are you seriously asking me for advice? I'm a fucking open socialist.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Bel_Edwards

This is my best guess. Too working-class for the lanyards, too male for the gender nutjobs, too white for the race-fixated people though :(

I quite like this guy a lot actually. He's in my top three preferred potential Dems. But I'm sure the "Bernie-wing" purists will act like he's Pinochet or something for not being perfect in everyway.

Null would be suicided.

"You may say that I'm a dreamer... but I'm not the only one..."
 
Who is somebody that you think the party can run and win in 2020?
While giving Elizabeth "Pocahontas" Warren the ticket for 2020 would seem extremely retarded, considering she'd lose against Trump because of incumbent's advantage, Crazy Bernie maybe running as an independent/third party candidate, and everything else, it could let the DNC make some strategic moves. Assuming Warren steps down from her Senate seat during the campaign, it will allow for another "rising star" like Obama the Democrat Party can groom and raise for 2024.
Joe_Kennedy_III%2C_115th_official_photo.jpg
 
Hillary's legacy will be the collapse of the Democratic Party.

People always predict that one of the parties will fall. The Democrats were going to fall after the Civil War, then the Republicans were doomed after the great depression, then fucked again after Goldwater. Then the Democrats would surely never win after McGovern right? But after Watergate how could anybody ever vote Republican? Okay, this time it's the end, no way Democrats win again after Reagan. And boy did W sure fuck up, I bet we'll have two Dems in a row next! We've had the same two political parties, though they'll evolved greatly, since the 1860s. That extraordinary and no other country on earth can claim that. Parties have been through worse than selecting a candidate who was just three states from winning. We'll be stuck with these two for the rest of our lives. Get use to it kids.
 
This is necessary. The progressive wing has gotten progressively insane over the past several years and it's dragging the entire party down. It's hard to do the things that need to be done if you're not anywhere near power and there are a lot of people within the party doing everything they can to drive voters away.

they said the exact same thing about far right-wing lunatics and the republican party and look what happened there. the loudest and nuttiest branch of the right wing helped elect donald fucking trump into the white house, but the more conventional republicans have a ton of power as a result. dems should have gone the whole hog and booted the "establishment" leadership---or at least pretended to---and fully embrace its progressive loonies as the faces of the party.

i guess a long-term game could be to end up being the party of stability and take a bet that the republican party will fracture due to far-right trumpism, but i'm not optimistic about that.
 
they said the exact same thing about far right-wing lunatics and the republican party and look what happened there. the loudest and nuttiest branch of the right wing helped elect donald fucking trump into the white house, but the more conventional republicans have a ton of power as a result. dems should have gone the whole hog and booted the "establishment" leadership---or at least pretended to---and fully embrace its progressive loonies as the faces of the party.

i guess a long-term game could be to end up being the party of stability and take a bet that the republican party will fracture due to far-right trumpism, but i'm not optimistic about that.
I don't think the progressive loonies appeal to anyone even other progressive loonies, how would that be helpful? Unless you're not talking about the "whitey's the devil" people or their actually powerful idols who get erections at the idea of a nation full of exploitable non-citizen "brown people" who somehow are accepted as "progressive".
 
Last failed candidate to run twice in a row was Thomas Dewey back in the 1940s. It's not going to happen. I think people vastly overestimate the "IT WAS MY TURN!" aspect of her character. She is very unlikely to run again.

You never underestimate crazy.

While giving Elizabeth "Pocahontas" Warren the ticket for 2020 would seem extremely exceptional, considering she'd lose against Trump because of incumbent's advantage, Crazy Bernie maybe running as an independent/third party candidate, and everything else, it could let the DNC make some strategic moves. Assuming Warren steps down from her Senate seat during the campaign, it will allow for another "rising star" like Obama the Democrat Party can groom and raise for 2024.
Joe_Kennedy_III%2C_115th_official_photo.jpg

This is several orders of magnitude beyond too ginger to be president.
 
If she tries to run in 2020, I hope they boo her out of any event she attends. The bitch had her chance, twice! And lost.
I doubt she'll ever continue, she tried so hard it doesn't look like she wants to continue doing this.

Otherwise good luck for her.
 
..... a battle that fractured a party already in ruins.

lol, i don't know anything about the author of this piece but if their anything like 95% of democrats who are concerned about the future of the party they probably were certain before about 9:00 PM 11/09/2016 that the Republicans were effectively dead and that the Democrats would sail into a beautiful new progressive age.

These people didn't have the slightest idea of what was going on outside the narrow field of topics that "woke" comedy figures like Colbert and John Oliver cover, if it didn't involve the white house or some major senator they simply didn't hear about it. Or maybe they were slightly more informed and watched an actual news program like MSNBC or something like TYT, but I've heard even figureheads in the MSM compere the GOP to the whig party in the last 4 years.

Hell, when Trump's popularity first started to become apparent almost everyone on the left and the right were convinced that the Dems were certain to win because Trump would either run independently and drag a massive number of voters with him or go up against Hillary and be destroyed, as the e-mails clearly show the Dems thought would happen.
 
Last edited:
Wow.

Just... wow.

I had some modicum of hope that maybe, just maybe, the DNC would have had some self-reflection and realize that their tactics were a large reason why we're stuck with Trump in the White House. But, no, they're just repeating the same mistakes all over again. They're effectively alienating any moderates or slightly left-of-center Independents (like myself) by trying to force this same bullshit on all of us.

It's almost as if they want Trump to win again in 2020, just so they can have another excuse to masturbate to their butthurt for another 4 years.

As a wise man once said: You can't fix stupid.
 
I doubt Hillary will run again in 2020. But I do believe "it's my turn" in her mind extends to deciding who will run. If America wouldn't vote her in, she still thinks it's her place to choose America's next president.
 
I quite like this guy a lot actually. He's in my top three preferred potential Dems. But I'm sure the "Bernie-wing" purists will act like he's Pinochet or something for not being perfect in everyway.

Seriously? I'm one of those cocksuckers myself and my standards are now at the level of "not Hillary."

While giving Elizabeth "Pocahontas" Warren the ticket for 2020 would seem extremely exceptional, considering she'd lose against Trump because of incumbent's advantage, Crazy Bernie maybe running as an independent/third party candidate, and everything else, it could let the DNC make some strategic moves. Assuming Warren steps down from her Senate seat during the campaign, it will allow for another "rising star" like Obama the Democrat Party can groom and raise for 2024.

Obama was already famous in party circles because of his electrifying 2004 Democratic National Convention speech. This was at a grim time in party history, but everyone who saw it immediately thought this motherfucker is going to be our next President.

He instantly became the Great Black Hope and he did not disappoint in his campaigning.

There is really nobody like that on the horizon.

Also I'd say America will never elect a soulless ginger, but then you know what? George Washington was a fucking ginger. He just had the sense to cover it up.
 
Last edited:
Obama third term? *tearful sniff and pulls obligatory list of "things" he "did" to make themselves feel better*
 
I doubt Hillary will run again in 2020. But I do believe "it's my turn" in her mind extends to deciding who will run. If America wouldn't vote her in, she still thinks it's her place to choose America's next president.

Oh, I'm sure whoever the DNC chooses to run in 2020 will be handpicked by Hillary and become the Roman Reigns of the Democratic party: someone who's pushed to be the 'Golden Child'/savior of the party, but hated by everyone else because they're not who they want. yet they're forced upon everyone in a "This is your new candidate and you're going to LOVE them, damnit" fashion.

They threw Bernie under the bus, despite him being their only surefire chance to have beaten Trump, I suspect they'll throw any other internal challengers like him under the bus, too. Thus proving that the current boneheads at the DNC have not and will never learn from their mistakes, ever. I mean, they're already doing ideological purges/shunnings... just look at how they REEEE'd over an "unconventional" Democrat like Heath Mello during a mayoral election (who also got an endorsement from Sanders, btw), of all things, in Nebraska.
 
they said the exact same thing about far right-wing lunatics and the republican party and look what happened there. the loudest and nuttiest branch of the right wing helped elect donald fucking trump into the white house, but the more conventional republicans have a ton of power as a result.

Whoever elected Trump, his actual politics, while they're buried under nonstop partisan hysteria, are remarkably centrist. If he could actually manage to turn his politics into policies, at least some of what he'd do would please both sides. I am far from a fan of Trump, but it is a pity that his repulsive personality has made it impossible for him to get anything done even when his own party has a majority in both chambers of the legislature.

There are only a few things I agree with him on, but they're important. It would be nice to renegotiate NAFTA and numerous lesser known trade agreements that have been a giant gimme from America to the rest of the world at the expense of our own working class. It would be nice to get rid of the Kim dynasty once and for all. If Trump gets either of these done, the rest of his Presidency could be a dead waste and he'd still go down as a success.
 
Back
Top Bottom