This does not include, to steal your phrase, "asking for their fucking money". The motion to lift the stay let them proceed with the foreclosure despite the ongoing bankruptcy. What it did not do was give their claim automatic special status where it could not be discharged, and the motion became moot when Phil got his bankruptcy discharge without any objections from creditors. Whatever happens in the foreclosure suit now will be identical to what would have happened without the lifting of the stay.
MidFirst's behavior for this entire trial has been very strange and I don't understand some of what they did. Phil intended to surrender the property in bankruptcy, so there was never a world where they couldn't get it - either he got his bankruptcy and voluntarily surrendered it, or he didn't get it and the foreclosure could go ahead. A motion to lift the stay would have made sense if they wanted to get around bankruptcy protections but they promptly blew any legal privileges they had there when they did nothing for months on end. This goes double for a very simple (legally speaking) case.