- Joined
- Apr 2, 2020
DSP greed means he gets 100% of nothing rather than 80% of something.They have property management companies that just take a cut of the rent and will do all the hard stuff for you. There really was no excuse.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
DSP greed means he gets 100% of nothing rather than 80% of something.They have property management companies that just take a cut of the rent and will do all the hard stuff for you. There really was no excuse.
phil has issues with people making money from him.DSP greed means he gets 100% of nothing rather than 80% of something.
$400 a month is a pretty huge fee for a closet sized condo in a shitty development.
Association fees are out of control in the NE. But, they do everything outside the building except maybe shovel the walk to your front door. Building needs a new deck - fees cover it. New roof - fees cover it. Siding - fees. etcThat seems extremely high for that shithole. HOA fees can be pricey but not like that is a high COLA and a bojee complex.
Think of how little money it would have taken to make Rambo and Howard happy, while DSP was at the peak of his earning power, and he still didn't pay them.phil has issues with people making money from him.
that was the whole point john and rambo made in their video. being inconsiderate and greedyThink of how little money it would have taken to make Rambo and Howard happy, while DSP was at the peak of his earning power, and he still didn't pay them.
Not only did he not pay Howard, he had Howard pay for the Project7 shirts and then sold them to his patrons. Howard got googatz.Think of how little money it would have taken to make Rambo and Howard happy, while DSP was at the peak of his earning power, and he still didn't pay them.
yeah but 100 is bigger then 80 so its better innit ?DSP greed means he gets 100% of nothing rather than 80% of something.
I have a question in regards to Phil's condo in CZ: do we know inwhat condition it is in at the moment? From what I understand it has been empty for years (supposed empty maybe Phil has still some old stuff in it). Is it even livable at the moment?
And on another note: if Midfirst needs to renovate the condo could they make Phil accountable for the costs? Or what that be on them?
Greatest Joke would be if Midfirst gets the condo and later sells it for a way higher profit. I can already imagine Phils autisitc screeching "Bugged house market mechanics. Give me my money!!!!!!!"
I have a question in regards to Phil's condo in CZ: do we know inwhat condition it is in at the moment? From what I understand it has been empty for years (supposed empty maybe Phil has still some old stuff in it). Is it even livable at the moment?
It would mostly/all be on MidFirst unless they can prove specific negligence on the part of Phil. As an example, if he was/is responsible for paying utilities, failed to do so, and the pipes froze, burst, and caused water damage, that would likely be on Phil.
All the units in that complex are in the same two or three buildings so if something went wrong in his unit, it's very likely that the neighbors would have noticed and complained by now. There is also some lore I remember hearing that his dad stops by the place every now and then to pick up the mail and make sure the place has not had a major issue.
Put them all together and it's not impossible that something happened but it is really unlikely.
Legally this only matters if they do not intend to pursue him for the deficiency. If they intend to sue for the deficiency there is not a major difference between suing for a specific act of negligence and accepting a lower value on the property then just tacking that onto the deficiency suit. If they do not I think you are overstating how difficult this would be - the owner (still Phil) is responsible for maintenance even if he can show it was caused by tenants, neighbors, delivery drivers, his gout aunt, etc. Being able to show somebody else was at fault would only get him off the hook if he could show it was caused by MidFirst or court personnel.
sometimes I wonder, since he stopped paying the mortgage in CT, would he still be on the hook for property taxes
It sounds like the buyer of the foreclosure is on hook for any property taxes owed i guess its part of the deal.
Property taxes run with the property, so if you inherit property with unpaid property taxes, or foreclose on it, you are now responsible for them. The taxing authority can sell the property to collect. You also probably can't sell the property for much if it has tax liens on it.It sounds like the buyer of the foreclosure is on hook for any property taxes owed i guess its part of the deal.
He could name them as a third party defendant and if those debts were discharged in bankruptcy, they might be the ones left holding the bag, although I don't believe he listed any such debts anyway, except maybe the homeowner's association fees from before he declared bankruptcy.Being able to show somebody else was at fault would only get him off the hook if he could show it was caused by MidFirst or court personnel.
He could name them as a third party defendant and if those debts were discharged in bankruptcy, they might be the ones left holding the bag, although I don't believe he listed any such debts anyway, except maybe the homeowner's association fees from before he declared bankruptcy.
He intends to die before paying a cent to anyone.Honestly it seems like his only plan is to get white hot popular again and make a million dollars so he can pay off everything. Otherwise he has zero intentions of paying off any loans. Anyone loaning to him is a complete moron.
Possibly he wasn't legally allowed to enter the property. Until it's foreclosed on, he doesn't represent anyone who has the right to enter. If DSP didn't allow it, that might be why. It's odd if he didn't even try, though.The assessor who filed his report with the court late last year to support the strict foreclosure motion also went out of his way to state he did not enter the property as part of performing his assessment (which seems like just not doing your fucking job to me) so we don't even have a real assessment of the property's condition.