[Dec 15 2019] Foreclosure Saga - http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/CaseDetail/PublicCaseDetail.aspx?DocketNo=FBTCV196091825S

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Will DSP file his bankruptcy before MidFirst Bank gets their hands on his WAkhando?

  • Yes

    Votes: 112 51.9%

  • No

    Votes: 104 48.1%
  • Total voters
    216
Phil has a Twitter Blue Checkmark - In theory he could get served on Twitter as he's verified.

Twitter.JPG
 
leChinkyRaccoon said:
Does this mean he could appeal a CT decision in WA and could he be banking on an appeal in WA being favorable to him?
Click to expand...
I think it would be more like CT sending WA a text saying "Hey, this asshole owes us money, here's the proof," and WA giving CT permission to follow up with the collections process and be able to utilize WA resources to help facilitate it. Phil may want to appeal (but his inaction would pretty much render this course of action null and stupid), but WA would defer to CT with regards to the debt itself. CT is where it came from, so WA would be recognizing that it's legit and valid, thus allowing CT folks to get their pound of flesh.

It would take an exceptionally excellent argument presented by Phil (or his highly expensive attorney, should he go this route) for the WA court to step in and say "now, wait a minute..." and have this be resolved in a way that allows Phil to come out clean.

While it's not impossible... It is EXTREMELY unlikely. Phil will be stung by this. And his paypigs will either bail him out or he'll lose his real adult cahndo.
 
Schmeckel said:
I think it would be more like CT sending WA a text saying "Hey, this asshole owes us money, here's the proof," and WA giving CT permission to follow up with the collections process and be able to utilize WA resources to help facilitate it. Phil may want to appeal (but his inaction would pretty much render this course of action null and stupid), but WA would defer to CT with regards to the debt itself. CT is where it came from, so WA would be recognizing that it's legit and valid, thus allowing CT folks to get their pound of flesh.

It would take an exceptionally excellent argument presented by Phil (or his highly expensive attorney, should he go this route) for the WA court to step in and say "now, wait a minute..." and have this be resolved in a way that allows Phil to come out clean.

While it's not impossible... It is EXTREMELY unlikely. Phil will be stung by this. And his paypigs will either bail him out or he'll lose his real adult cahndo.
Click to expand...
Yeah, while it's doubtful, the link to the Revised Code of Washington says:
The clerk shall treat the foreign judgment in the same manner as a judgment of the district court of this state. A judgment so filed has the same effect and is subject to the same procedures, defenses, set-offs, counterclaims, cross-complaints, and proceedings for reopening, vacating, staying, transcribing, or extending as a judgment of a district court of this state, and may be enforced, transcribed, extended, or satisfied in like manner.
Click to expand...

I'm not an expert but from what I understand you make an appeal after a decision is made. I remember one of my professors saying something along the lines of you can appeal on the grounds of something that you objected to but got overruled on. However, if you didn't object to it in the first place you can't make an appeal based on that particular item. Now I'm sure there are tons of things you can appeal or things that would keep you from appealing but not showing up to the initial hearings at all may preclude all of this making this all a moot point. I'm just thinking this might make sense in DSP's twisted mind as it would put the ball in his court so to speak and make it so he could at least feasibly participate without taking as much time off of work.
 
leChinkyRaccoon said:
Yeah, while it's doubtful, the link to the Revised Code of Washington says:


I'm not an expert but from what I understand you make an appeal after a decision is made. I remember one of my professors saying something along the lines of you can appeal on the grounds of something that you objected to but got overruled on. However, if you didn't object to it in the first place you can't make an appeal based on that particular item. Now I'm sure there are tons of things you can appeal or things that would keep you from appealing but not showing up to the initial hearings at all may preclude all of this making this all a moot point. I'm just thinking this might make sense in DSP's twisted mind as it would put the ball in his court so to speak and make it so he could at least feasibly participate without taking as much time off of work.
Click to expand...
If Phil continues down the path he has already set...

CT folks will receive their judgment against Phil, CT entity will contact WA entity to say "this turd burglar owes us this money, either we collect or we'll toss a lien on your property" based on WA statutes, Phil will claim ignorance, WA will say "don't look at me, check these guys out!" and defer to the original CT judgment. Phil can try and appeal all he wants, but it would be an incredible uphill battle to claim ignorance/hardship/did-nuffin-wrong when he had ample opportunity to do so for almost a year. At most, this would delay things for another couple of months or so. His inaction is absolutely going to fuck him over.

Unless Phil directly responds to these things, and is able to work shit out.... He's going to be hosed. And we'll all get to see a large portion of it due to it being public record. Once that all goes down, the chat attendance will dwindle due to numerous people being lean-in-banned for making mention of his foreclosure...moreso than it is now.
 
Until he begins weebling hard in his chair in a super begathon, black begging shirt on and him making surprised baby faces of dim fear, I will just assume that Pig is fine.
 
Adamska said:
Until he begins weebling hard in his chair in a super begathon, black begging shirt on and him making surprised baby faces of dim fear, I will just assume that Pig is fine.
Click to expand...

I still beg to differ. When Phil feels safe, Phil talks mountains of shit. If he was just fine, he would be talking on stream about how the detractors are trying to make him look bad, that he already took care of the problem, that we are all mentally ill children, etc etc ad nauseum.

Phil’s silence on this subject leads me to believe he’s really scared and doesn’t know what to do. Phil is an egomaniac and a narcissist, if he truly thought he had won he’d be dunking on us, other detractors, the attorneys, the creditors, the HOA, etc.
 
Speaking of silence I had the chance to catch up on some detractor vids on YouTube and one had a fan ask Phil about the foreclosure and rather than laugh that stupid laugh and/or call said fan a detractor and/or moron he got stone cold silent. I've never seen anything like it. Something tells me for, him it's very real but rather than do something, anything about it he would do...nothing....
 
I would agree with the silence point if Phil was begging for money, which he's only done his standard panhandling for about 6 months now. Unless he's just counting the days until he's thrown out of the Renton khando.
 
thebonesauce said:
I still beg to differ. When Phil feels safe, Phil talks mountains of shit. If he was just fine, he would be talking on stream about how the detractors are trying to make him look bad, that he already took care of the problem, that we are all mentally ill children, etc etc ad nauseum.

Phil’s silence on this subject leads me to believe he’s really scared and doesn’t know what to do. Phil is an egomaniac and a narcissist, if he truly thought he had won he’d be dunking on us, other detractors, the attorneys, the creditors, the HOA, etc.
Click to expand...
It's telling and I can see Pig doing this in those rare cases he can't blame it on something else, but I'm just going to be pessimistic on purpose and state he'll find a way to avoid the consequences until it happens.
 
leChinkyRaccoon said:
Does this mean he could appeal a CT decision in WA and could he be banking on an appeal in WA being favorable to him?
Click to expand...
He can appeal all he wants. Courts usually adhere to other states' decisions because those states know those states' laws better than the new state.

Did I use the word state enough times to be uninformative?
 
I think the main reason why he's so silent about this is that some lawyer told him to shut up and not say anything about this. Which is good advice as anything Phil says about this will likely be used against him in a court of law.
 
DarkScrubPhil said:
I think the main reason why he's so silent about this is that some lawyer told him to shut up and not say anything about this. Which is good advice as anything Phil says about this will likely be used against him in a court of law.
Click to expand...
judge: "is it true that you have an agenda against bankers?"
DSP: "ack, ack, ack, what do you mean?"
court attendant rolls out a TV set, and plays this:
www.youtube.com

DSPGaming's Nine Year Legacy Part 2: Blip TV Racism

Phil in 2010 joined Blip.tv to make money, but kicked off after LARPing as a Nazi in space killing Jews while playing Dead Space
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
 
leChinkyRaccoon said:
Does this mean he could appeal a CT decision in WA and could he be banking on an appeal in WA being favorable to him?
Click to expand...

No. In that event, he's already lost the case. It's been decided against him. He had his opportunity to challenge it in Connecticut and chose not to. He can only make certain collateral challenges against it like claiming he was never served or that the original court never had jurisdiction in the first place (fat chance of that for a Connecticut court deciding a Connecticut mortgage about a Connecticut property that DSP bought while he was in Connecticut).
 
DSP announced he is in fact aware of the foreclosure on January 16, 2020 in a special State of the Union Address thing he calls State of the Stream.
 
Harvester of Shekels said:
So he spent the past month or so banning anyone who brought it up, just to announce it on his stREEEam?

I guess he now knows the jig is finally up.
Click to expand...
He had to reveal the bankruptcy to his wheelchairs because we would have found out through public filings.

We found out about the foreclosure and his mobile game addiction and he figured he better get out in front of the bankruptcy because keeping that a secret would have caused major issues with his chat and paypigs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom