- Joined
- Mar 29, 2014
Do SJWs even believe in God, or is faith seen as "problematic"?
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do SJWs even believe in God, or is faith seen as "problematic"?
The reality of God's existence does not depend on their acceptance.Do SJWs even believe in God, or is faith seen as "problematic"?
I think the "god" of SJWs is "marginalized groups" and "community" -- like you said, Floyd is seen like a prophet or martyr.they "sort of" do
It's simple, really.
God made each and every one of us the way we are.
If you're a man or a woman it's because God made you that way.
To be trans is akin to claiming God made a mistake, which is impossible.
Therefore trannys are an affront to God and should not be tolerated.
they "sort of" do. their main prophet was a gorilla swarthoid ape that got kneeled on back in 2020, that was their religious prophet. (sorry that sort of got offtopic)
View attachment 6476406View attachment 6476408
>"Muh peer-reviewed studies"
View attachment 6479039
I find it funny that most SJWs deny His existence, yet whenever a religious man does a wrong think™ because of his religious beliefs, they immediately try indoctrinating him that he's wrong "as God would never do this since He's all loving and caring and He validates my special feelings."Do SJWs even believe in God, or is faith seen as "problematic"?
Like that meme about that smug SJW saying he doesn't believe the Bible, then he also claims Jesus supports mass immigration (IIRC)?I find it funny that most SJWs deny His existence, yet whenever a religious man does a wrong think™ because of his religious beliefs, they immediately try indoctrinating him that he's wrong "as God would never do this since He's all loving and caring and He validates my special feelings."
Basically yeah.Like that meme about that smug SJW saying he doesn't believe in Christ, but claims Christ supported mass immigration (or something like that)?
I went out of my way to find the most pozzed sources imaginable, there is absolutely nothing that says that self-identifying as a woman makes you non-distinct from a natal woman. 99% of the “science” is that “people I deride as trans, therefore trans people exist and are valid”. The only take I have ever heard from a biological standpoint is the “brains resemble preferred gender” argument which immediately falls apart because if a troon is identified to have an unambiguously male brain, it would not change any of your minds. You would just refer back to self-identification. This is why no one is good faith with you because it’s a waste of time.Science supports transpeople. Cry about it.
Yes and don't let internet Christians tell you otherwise. The vast majority of libtards in America identify as Christian or Spiritual. Every other Lutheran Church flies the fag flag these days.Do SJWs even believe in God, or is faith seen as "problematic"?
Come on, believe the science chud>"Muh peer-reviewed studies"
View attachment 6479039
My heckin' make believe sky daddy exists but believing trans people exist? CRAZY!something something demons wearing human skin, do not condemn the person who has a chance to repent for their evils to death; give the Lord a chance to lead them to salvation through repentance.
There's absolutely zero sky daddy proof after thousands of years, meanwhile modern science agrees that trans people exist and are legitimate.The reality of God's existence does not depend on their acceptance.
There's absolutely zero sky daddy proof after thousands of years, meanwhile modern science agrees that trans people exist and are legitimate.
Gender identity and transition aren't the same topic, but I know that's too much for a smooth brain like you.Modern science also agrees that a rotting wound that needs to be forcibly kept open is a "vagina", and a hunk of thigh meat rolled up like a sausage and grafted to a woman's groin is a "penis". Your "modern science" is a mockery of logical thought.
I'm not a trans person.Also
>Tranny
>obsessed with Lain
every single time.
They are connected topics. One informs the other, and they are both upheld by the "modern science" you appeal to. If their logic is suspect in one regard, why would I accept it in another? When they say "trans women are women", that also implies "surgical wounds are vaginas". By propping up one, they prop up the other. To act like they are unconnected is simply asinine.Gender identity and transition aren't the same topic, but I know that's too much for a smooth brain like you.
I'm not a trans person.