How were the vigilantes to know that Daniel would have that kind of meltdown (in which it really wasn't that severe)? He didn't have a meltdown over the haircut and his meltdowns when he's been kicked out of various places in Las Vegas were little more than temper tantrums. Also, Daniel MAY have had a bit more of a serious meltdown and possibly hurt someone (which again is debatable) but in the meantime, Daniel was having a direct, negative impact on that dog's welfare. Also, just where does Daniel's personal accountability begin and end? You're framing this as though Daniel is completely absolved of personal accountability when he has these reactions.