I'm the exact opposite; I think he says a lot of rather obvious things using the Hambly Method where he'll stretch out something apparent as far as he possibly can. The
Book of Henry "analysis" is probably the peak example of it. "The child is adult-like... and the adults are immature?!?!", phenomenal deep dive into the material there, Dan.
He's certainly competent as a presenter, sure. I have yet to see anything that demonstrates any substantial knowledge of movies or even a unique perspective on anything.