💪 Tough Guys Dalton Levi Eatherly / Chud the Builder / ChudTheBuilder - Putting the hard r in retard. IRL streamer who provokes confrontations with Tennessee blacks and shot a guy while streaming.

[Drip Torch]

glowing

That's a good way to put it.

 

[Gatcha Gonna Getcha]

you idiots really hate the emotes. makes me do them more.

I never got where this cope comes from. We are laughing at people like you.

 

[Vlad the Implier]

This 1948 TN Supreme Court case seems to be frequently cited as the authority in this area. This image, from that decision, itself contains a citation from another case that you could look into if you wanted.

https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8334572/whitlock-v-state/

View attachment 9030050


Here is a 1995 decision from a TN court of appeals (below the TN supreme court) in which a nigger did not get to get away with murder because (he claimed) the victim called him the nigger word, after the nigger snatched money out of the victim's hands:

https://law.justia.com/cases/tennessee/court-of-criminal-appeals/1995/909-s-w-2d-461.html

View attachment 9030105

The court did find that being called a nigger could be a mitigating factor (not a defense to the assault itself). I'm not sure about your last question. I don't know of any examples, I'm also not an attorney.

I saw this one, the the problem is it doesn't quite parallel the issue of self-defense that's coming up with Chud's case. Here, provocation is being applied as a mitigating factor (not defense) to an unlawful assault. Chud's matter is whether provocation disqualifies his right to self defense. I'm also not sure if the standard for provocation as a mitigating factor is different for provocation as a disqualification for self defense. Let me see if I can illustrate my point, I'll use green for irrelevant/neutral, yellow for complication, orange for dangerous complication, red for outright criminal:

The case you just cited:
Nigger instigates by robbing + has gun while committing robbery -> Nigger gets called a nigger -> Nigger murders

He didn't kill because he was called a nigger. He already planned to kill and just used it as an excuse. Naturally the court rejected this even as a mitigating factor. Full murder sentence, not manslaughter.

Chud doesn't have a gun and isn't going to try for self-defense:
Chud dindu nuffin he a good boy -> Nigger punches him -> Full sentence for assault
Chud instigates by calling a Nigger a nigger -> Nigger punches him -> Reduced sentence cuz of muh raycism

Chud has a gun and intends use it for self-defence if needed:
Chud dindu nuffin he a good boy -> Nigger punches him -> Nigger gets shot
Chud instigates by calling a Nigger a nigger -> Nigger punches him -> Nigger gets shot

The reason why I colored the last the instigation and self-defense orange is because the state law that says you don't have a right to self-defense if you provoke the conflict. Does this make sense?

I find law fascinating. Thank you to anyone who bothers to read all that shit or offer any feedback.

 

[FrancoSupremacist]

As an Orthodox Christian convert myself, I hate Chud because he is literally every stereotype about converts to the faith combined. He’s the exact kind of person libs and journalists point at to justify their belief that Orthodoxy has a problem with the “far-right.” I’m not usually the type to rail against so-called “orthobros” because that’s not really my experience with the fellow converts at my parish and honestly that buzzword has been overused to death.

 

[Sirfaggot]

I got the same bullshit as well.

Those are rookie numbers, son. I've farmed so many goddamn cans on this here thread that I'm practically a newlywed couple's car now, headed straight for the next person who calls me "honker".

 

[Flaming Insignias]

This 1948 TN Supreme Court case seems to be frequently cited as the authority in this area. This image, from that decision, itself contains a citation from another case that you could look into if you wanted.

https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8334572/whitlock-v-state/

View attachment 9030050


Here is a 1995 decision from a TN court of appeals (below the TN supreme court) in which a nigger did not get to get away with murder because (he claimed) the victim called him the nigger word, after the nigger snatched money out of the victim's hands:

https://law.justia.com/cases/tennessee/court-of-criminal-appeals/1995/909-s-w-2d-461.html

View attachment 9030105

The court did find that being called a nigger could be a mitigating factor (not a defense to the assault itself). I'm not sure about your last question. I don't know of any examples, I'm also not an attorney.

I do feel that the differing stakes matter a lot when talking about provocation and mitigating factors. You can't just assault somebody because they said something that offends you, but the courts are liable to consider that word to be a provocation that could make your actions slightly justified. The severity of the response will definitely effect the mitigation as well, since I think it is completely fair to say that somebody calling a nigger a nigger during an argument isn't justification to torture that person to death and then rape their wife.

Honestly, I really do feel that the prospect of the nigger getting off is entirely Chud's own fault for terrible OpSec and being sure to aggressively void any claim to self-defense based on provocation doctrines. If he hadn't made posts talking about how he hoped to get into a scenario where he could justify shooting somebody, he wouldn't have to worry about his prior behavior being used to argue premeditation, and the fact that he basically told the nigger some form of “do it, no balls” with his hand on his pistol will be seen as provoking that “self-defense” scenario he posted about, which is likely to be what condemns him unless his jury is composed of the brand of “Being a criminal shitstain is BASED AND TRVD if you're white” posters on this thread.

Karmelo Anthony broke half this thread. I understand being enraged at the blind tribal allegiance displayed by niggers in that case, but deciding that it's justification to start acting like animals to “save the white race” is doing nothing but playing into the hands of people that want us dead or imprisoned for opposing their “Equal and Multicultural Society” by giving them a windmill to tilt at.

 

[DominoPetachi]

Only an absolute idiot, black person, or average woman has your POV.

I’m convinced everyone who supports the nigger attacking Chud is a white liberal chick, a resentful brownie, and/or ugly.

It doesn’t matter how you explain your point of view they will immediately accuse you of being a low IQ redneck, bleat about FiGhTIng WoRdS, and defend physical violence as an acceptable response to words by claiming Chud just chases after blixes calling them nigger. Americans especially huWite Americans really do worship niggers.

I feel strongly that taking the high road and being passive and agreeable is the reason we are in this situation at all. How many more concessions will white people make for blacks in order to appease and placate them in the hopes that they will be less violent and more civilized? So far the word nigger is a beat up whitey for free card. I see black Twitter accuse people are thinking the word nigger. If it’s okay now to assault someone for saying nigger, how long is it going to be before the possibility of someone thinking nigger is “self-defense”?

Nobody here is saying that Chud is a hero or that they condone his racist nuisance streaming but they will accuse you of that over and over if you don’t agree that Chud is a white trash low IQ redneck who got what he deserved and the nigger is precious, long-suffering, and of course totally innocent.

Apparently he was streaming as he walked out of the courthouse (I stand corrected on that one though definitive proof has not been dropped) so I am looking forward to seeing what really happened. It is also claimed by Chud’s “camera man” that they were in fact streaming when they noticed the two black gentleman pointing and laughing at Chud. Chud did approach them after they got his attention and asked them if they were going to chimp out. The angry black gentleman told Chud that he had PTSD and Chud said that hoped the black gentleman’s day gets better. He then walked away.

It is also claimed that Chud went for his pepper spray when the nubien king resorted to fisticuffs in a fair fight between two gentlemen and totally didn’t attack him from behind, but either dropped the can or couldn’t remove the can from its holster in the scuffle and so went for the gun instead. I don’t know how much of that is true but since there is a stream of it AND certainly courthouse surveillance video, all will be revealed.

In the meantime, I’m just going to laugh at these angry blixes and high road cucks who aren’t totally acting like liberal white women while they impotently sticker bomb people with top hats and trash cans. It’s probably worthwhile to just get the information directly from X than to bother with a thread like this anyway. Let the bootlicking Good Whites suck each other off in peace.

 

[WhimsicalTrolli]

nigger attacking Chud is a white liberal chick, a resentful brownie, and/or ugly.

Police and witnesses said he pulled a gun out before any attack occurred.

 

[Drip Torch]

The retard got shot by his own gun? How do you fuck something like this up so bad? Inbreds with guns are a greater danger to themselves than anyone else.

 

[Flaming Insignias]

Police and witnesses said he pulled a gun out before any attack occurred.

If that's true, then the nigger was extra stupid for thinking it was a good idea to actually attack the guy who clearly wanted to shoot him. Makes Chud's case look even worse if he had already escalated to weaponry before being punched in an argument he (probably) started and egged on with his own version of “Take yer swing” as popularized by the Dumpster Defenders.

Of course, you're asking a bunch of White Niggers to consider the idea that provocation is an actual complication to self-defense claims and not just a conspiracy to “keep the White Man down” because you can't shoot up a ghetto Walmart over a black criminal getting a light sentence.

 

[DominoPetachi]

View attachment 9026703
>the threat or use of force against another is not justified:
>if the person using force provoked the other individual's use or attempted use of unlawful force

This is directly from Tennessee state law.

What if the provoker backs down from the confrontation that he allegedly started, says “I hope your day gets better”, walks away, and then gets attacked from behind?

 

[Vlad the Implier]

being punched in an argument he (probably) started and egged on with his own version of “Take yer swing” as popularized by the Dumpster Defenders.

Ah doubt it.

What if the provoker backs down from the confrontation that he allegedly started, says “I hope your day gets better”, walks away, and then gets attacked from behind?

I believe that the law allows for it if you make a good faith effort to de-escalate and make it clear you don't want trouble. There are preceding details that have yet to come out.

 

[Dafuqisdis?]

Police and witnesses said he pulled a gun out before any attack occurred.

No he didn't pull it apparently but he reached for it before there was any sort of physical altercation.

 

[Gunter x Gunter]

This is even worse. He tried hitting up the Kike, but got told "Hell no."

How over is it for whitebros, it feels so over

 

[DominoPetachi]

What is so hard to understand about that you're not just allowed to go around murdering people? How are people this fucking stupid?

Who got murdered?

 

[Twix Eatr]

God, you dumb faggots think "provocation" is a lifelong title all future actions meet. Unless Chud was personally "provoking" this dumb shit in that moment, it doesn't matter. And "provocation" is still a nonsense term.

No he didn't pull it apparently but he reached for it before there was any sort of physical altercation.

According to one stupid black "journalist." And that doesn't matter, either. He may have reached for his weapon and THEN a black retard violently attacked the racist guy?

 

[Vlad the Implier]

And "provocation" is still a nonsense term.

Its a legal term per Tennessee state criminal law and in most other states. Like it or not its the law of the land and its going to be the hill that the lawyers are going to argue around on his case.

 

[Twix Eatr]

And it doesn't retroactively extend to past deeds, you retarded left-wing faggot.

 

[Layton Mysteries]

What if the provoker backs down from the confrontation that he allegedly started, says “I hope your day gets better”, walks away, and then gets attacked from behind?

That is addressed in the next two sentences of the law which was so conveniently ignored, which I referenced earlier. In those cases he would regain the justification for self defense.

(e)The threat or use of force against another is not justified:

• (1) If the person using force consented to the exact force used or attempted by the other individual;
• (2)If the person using force provoked the other individual's use or attempted use of unlawful force, unless:
  • (A) The person using force abandons the encounter or clearly communicates to the other the intent to do so; and
  • (B) The other person nevertheless continues or attempts to use unlawful force against the person; or

---

I mean 70% of sexual Assault, pedophilia, consumers of CSAM are predominately white, and you can't even use per capita out if it outside of Native Americans regarding rape. I never said Joshua didn't have a domestic. I said tge Joshua fox who's in a sex offender registry was white and born 14 years prior to him.

Wow, a white pedophile exists. You really proved you're point by naming a white pedophile completely unrelated to the case. I guess black people commit more violent crime and overall sexual assaults per capita compared to whites, but white people are pedophiles at about the same rate as blacks.
Also, I don't think you are understanding what people mean when they say per capita. People typically are referring to comparing the percentages of two different groups that do a certain thing. For example, per capita 41% of troons attempt suicide in their lifetime. Per capita, ~4% of the general population attempts suicide in their lifetimes. Therefore, you can see that troons attempt suicide at a rate of around 10x more than the general population. Per capita isn't about the percentage a certain type of crime (or other statistic) which is done by a particular group. If you do that with the troon example, you will see that troons only make up less than 10% of people who commit suicide. That is not per capita and is not a good way to look at the statistics, since there are not an equal number of troons and non-troons. Remember for your 70% number, if that is from police databases, they very often consider lightskinned blacks and hispanics white, which means the percentage of the population they consider white is much higher than on the census. That makes it really difficult to do the stats on that number, where did you get it anyways?
That was one of the dumbest post I have read on this site.

---

Not every brawl is a legal license to kill.

I agree with your point here. From what Chud described, it doesn't sound like it was a brawl he started though. If he is being truthful he attempted to disengage as well, which will help his case. I think everything hinges on info we don't have right now. If it was just him saying nigger, or telling Joshua not to chimp out, then disengaging, then I think he should be fine, morally and by the letter of the law at least, even though he could probably still be convicted due to a corrupt legal system.

---

Can't say I hate the emotes, I just wish you'd express your thoughts via actual posts instead of mere reactions. I'm sure you have very interesting insights to contribute

The worst thing about this thread is everyone feels the need to make a post every 5 minutes rather than waiting to collate their posts together or until something new happens to post. It makes it really hard to follow.

 

[Sirfaggot]

It is also claimed that Chud went for his pepper spray when the nubien king resorted to fisticuffs in a fair fight between two gentlemen and totally didn’t attack him from behind, but either dropped the can or couldn’t remove the can from its holster in the scuffle and so went for the gun instead.

The warrant's description of events specifies that he *reached for his gun* (but did not draw it) during his verbal confrontation with Joshua Fox, then aimed and fired after being struck. There is no mention of him fumbling for a different item he failed to produce in time, these are just fantasies conjured by people desperate to exculpate him for whatever reason. The same goes for his being followed, which is something he alleges; I highly doubt he was actually stalked by the negro menace if the court saw fit to charge him with attempted murder. That would be deranged.

It’s probably worthwhile to just get the information directly from X

Oh well that explains it.

The worst thing about this thread is everyone feels the need to make a post every 5 minutes rather than waiting to collate their posts together or until something new happens to post. It makes it really hard to follow.

Yeah this is definitely going to be one of those "you had to be there" threads.