💼 Careercow "Daddy" Derek Savage - Creator of Cool Cat Saves the Kids

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I can't tell if the official Cool Cat Twitter account is a parody or Daddy Derek's mid-life crisis in action.
 
I don't vote in the US, but if I did I would probably prefer CC to be placed in the White House instead of Trump.
 
I think tweets like this tend to further this confusion:

[MEDIA=twitter]683784327084179456[/MEDIA]
What the actual fuck. This can't be real.

. . .this is real, isn't it.

EDIT: Nevermind, it's fake. Truth is stranger than fiction, I just had to be sure.
 
Last edited:
Isn't the black flag what ISIS uses these days? >.>
I'm sure that actually is the ISIS flag, just edited in MS Paint.
. . .But it didn't register until after I finished this:
coolcatisis.png
 
Gotta wonder if Derek even knew that.
Daddy Derek's reaction to Twitter stuff is so confusing. Is he really so blinded by his love of Cool Cat that he can't tell things like "on a scale of 1/69 I give Cool Cat 69" are jokes? And if he thinks reviews using Cool Cat's image are copyright infringement, wouldn't photoshopped images also be copyright infringement because they use CC's image?
 
Daddy Derek's reaction to Twitter stuff is so confusing. Is he really so blinded by his love of Cool Cat that he can't tell things like "on a scale of 1/69 I give Cool Cat 69" are jokes? And if he thinks reviews using Cool Cat's image are copyright infringement, wouldn't photoshopped images also be copyright infringement because they use CC's image?
Less confusing and more delusional.
 
Daddy Derek's reaction to Twitter stuff is so confusing. Is he really so blinded by his love of Cool Cat that he can't tell things like "on a scale of 1/69 I give Cool Cat 69" are jokes? And if he thinks reviews using Cool Cat's image are copyright infringement, wouldn't photoshopped images also be copyright infringement because they use CC's image?

He didn't seem to have any problem with the Cool Cat 9/11 image either.
 
And if he thinks reviews using Cool Cat's image are copyright infringement, wouldn't photoshopped images also be copyright infringement because they use CC's image?
I think after that whole thing exploded and he ended up being proven wrong, he backed down from his copyright crusade.
 
I think after that whole thing exploded and he ended up being proven wrong, he backed down from his copyright crusade.
This wouldn't surprise me, seeing as I think he'd probably get shot down again and doesn't want to risk another shitfest again.
 
Back
Top Bottom