- Joined
- Apr 19, 2019
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Too much booze but probably just fine tasting.
TOTALLY LIKE ORANGE MAN BAD HARRY POTTER MARVEL
That's like, 3-4 nights going out drinking beer in Scandinavia? Doesn't seem so bad.Too much booze but probably just fine tasting.
Assuming midshelf booze (~$30/bottle), that recipe ate $360 in alcohol alone.
Going out drinking is real fucking expensive. Bars have to charge extra on top of the usual restaurant 300% mark-up to overcome that sin tax.That's like, 3-4 nights going out drinking beer in Scandinavia? Doesn't seem so bad.
Dayum. Is that mustache painted on with a mascara brush?
You clearly don't understand human biology..Listen, missy, how many babies can a woman give birth to in 9 months if she gave 100% and ate all the drugs? Eight babies? That's a laughably low baby-output when compared to what a bored feudal warlord could do in the same amount of time. A woman simply cannot produce as many children as a man so who is the true and honest baby-maker here?
Uhm, cursed post?You clearly don't understand human biology..
Supplying sperm is no different to a woman supplying her egg and uterus. That is the only part the male played in it. The woman, not the man, then grows, births, breastfeeds and, historically, provided the lionshare of the childcare. Not the male.
So the female is the better "baby maker." However, I'm aware this biological truth mightily offends troons and effeminate White males.
If you don't believe me then have a wank and see if you have a baby nine months from now..
Time Saving Tip:You won't because you need a FEMALE to MAKE the baby because males DON'T make babies. Biological FACT.
I do believe it's a form of mental illness amongst White men today that you have a bizarre desire to usurp women as mothers and that you actually believe sperm are "babies."
Men work and give women 70 cents per dollar that they make, that accounts for a large part of raising a child. Without a man the only babies a woman will have are cats and the world champion of having the most children will always be a man. I'm trolling you, you retard.You clearly don't understand human biology..
Supplying sperm is no different to a woman supplying her egg and uterus. That is the only part the male played in it. The woman, not the man, then grows, births, breastfeeds and, historically, provided the lionshare of the childcare. Not the male.
It takes two to tango, as they say.Men work and give women 70 cents per dollar that they make, that accounts for a large part of raising a child. Without a man the only babies a woman will have are cats and the world champion of having the most children will always be a man. I'm trolling you, you retard.
It might take "two to tango"It takes two to tango, as they say.
Unless humans can discover how to parthenogenically reproduce (pretty sure that’s the word) like some reptiles do, you need a man and a woman. Biological ones.