- Joined
- Jul 27, 2022
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Every munchie is a visible idiot and you should just take a clean headshot any time you see one.“Not all disabilities are visible”
I know that it’s true, but everyone who shoves it down people’s throats is a munchie.
It just flows better when describing a subject in the general vicinity of an idea, but not rigidly adherent to it.Other than its overuse, I don't have a problem with this. I think "[Thing]-adjacent" just sounds higher brow to a lot of people though; something that could be used as a punchline by someone who engaged in the type of political-comedic humour that dominated the 2000s where using vernacular that was just a little more intellectual than average was almost a point of pride.
You can still see it in insanely popular prokopetz on tumblr.someone who engaged in the type of political-comedic humour that dominated the 2000s where using vernacular that was just a little more intellectual than average was almost a point of pride
That "we" is such a smarmy little insert, because what they mean is "We need to talk only with others who agree with everything we say, because we love to jerk each other off.""We need to talk about ['social justice' BS issue #9001]."
First, that "we need to talk about" sounds so soy. And second, no "we" do not. SJWs have made up enough things that are "problematic".
Also the "we" means creating an artificial group. You're just you. You're not "we." Fuck you. You're just some faggot, you don't get to use "we" and claim the rest of us are some kind of group. You're just some stupid fucking jackass, you are not "we."That "we" is such a smarmy little insert, because what they mean is "We need to talk only with others who agree with everything we say, because we love to jerk each other off."
In theory it's broad-mindedness and curiosity. In practice it's kowtowing, gatekeeping, and humiliation.I'm not familiar with the specific organization or their execution of this, but I'm struggling to see what's inherently wrong with it.
It always came across to me as a condescending "I'm better than you and I need to BS you" sort of way.That "we" is such a smarmy little insert
before Current Year: "Dude, your Gyarados is gonna get one-shotted by that Electabuzz.""One-shotted"
Tell me you can't aura farm without telling me you can't aura farm"aura farming" is a new (to me) term and it's gay as fuck.
Every munchie is a visible idiot and you should just take a clean headshot any time you see one.
This one in particularly pisses me off.-Replies to any question online that start with "Hello, [profession] here!"
I don't even know why this grinds my gears so much, but it just does.
Maybe make a thread in general, titled something like "Your interactions with munchies", wide-reaching but with a theme.I wish that I could talk about munchies more. I know we have a munchie thread, but it’s in the beauty parlour where everyone makes armchair diagnoses of other fake disorders
Never mind the actual munchies on the thread itself. "Speaking as someone who ACTUALLY HAS [list of diseases only munchies have]". . .I wish that I could talk about munchies more. I know we have a munchie thread, but it’s in the beauty parlour where everyone makes armchair diagnoses of other fake disorders.