Current issues with the market - Any ideas on avoiding the end?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I think we missed this while waiting the bankgeddon.
Mexico has apparently asked to join BRICS informally a few days ago. Here's the English video:
OAS coup launched in 5...4...3..2... Oh wait, GOP warhawks going in hot? (Archive)
GRAHAM: “Drug cartels in Mexico have been terrorizing Americans for decades. We are going to unleash the fury and might of the U.S. against these cartels. We are going to destroy their business model and their lifestyle because our national security and the security of the United States as a whole depends on us taking this decisive action. The second step that we will be engaging in is give the military the authority to go after these organizations wherever they exist. Not to invade Mexico. Not to shoot Mexican airplanes down. But to destroy drug labs that are poisoning Americans.”

Remember this statement on GM I posted earlier?
DETROIT – General Motors will offer voluntary buyouts to a “majority” of its 58,000 U.S. white-collar employees, as it aims to cut $2 billion in structural costs over the next two years, according to a letter sent to workers Thursday from CEO Mary Barra.

The “Voluntary Separation Program,” or VSP, will be offered to all U.S. salaried employees who have spent five or more years at the company as of June 30. Outside of the U.S., the automaker will offer buyouts to executives with at least two years of time at the company.
@Puff looks like Ford is now on suicide watch too? (Archive).
Ford Motor Co.'s electric vehicle business has lost $3 billion before taxes during the past two years and will lose a similar amount this year as the company invests heavily in the new technology.

The figures were released Thursday as Ford rolled out a new way of reporting financial results. The new business structure separates electric vehicles, the profitable internal combustion and commercial vehicle operations into three operating units.

Company officials said the electric vehicle unit, called “Ford Model e,” will be profitable before taxes by late 2026 with an 8% pretax profit margin. But they wouldn't say exactly when it's expected to start making money.


Chief Financial Officer John Lawler said Model e should be viewed as a startup company within Ford.

“As everyone knows, EV startups lose money while they invest in capability, develop knowledge, build (sales) volume and gain (market) share,” he said.

Model e, he said, is working on second- and even third-generation electric vehicles. It currently offers three EVs for sale in the U.S.: the Mustang Mach E SUV, the F-150 Lightning pickup and an electric Transit commercial van.

The new corporate reporting system, Lawler said, is designed to give investors more transparency than the old system of reporting results by geographic regions. The automaker calculated earnings for each of the three units during the past two calendar years.

Model e had pretax losses of $900 million in 2021 and $2.1 billion last year, and it is expected to lose $3 billion this year. In the past two years Ford has announced it would build four new battery factories and a new vehicle assembly plant as well as spending heavily to acquire raw materials to build electric vehicles.

By the end of this year, the company expects to be building electric vehicles at a rate of 600,000 per year, reaching a rate of 2 million per year by the end of 2026.

Ford Blue, the unit that sells internal combustion and gas-electric hybrid vehicles, made just over $10 billion before taxes during the last two years. Ford Pro, the commercial vehicle unit, made $5.9 billion during those years, the company said.

For this year, Ford expects Ford Blue to post a $7 billion pretax profit, modestly better than last year. Ford Pro is expected to earn $6 billion before taxes, nearly double its earnings last year, Lawler said.

Ford was to present the new structure, announced last March, to analysts and investors on Thursday. Other business units include corporate, Ford Credit and Ford Next, a new business incubator.

Lawler said the company is changing the way it does business, not just doing an accounting exercise.

“After 120 years, we've essentially re-founded Ford,” he said. “We're embracing technology and competitive disruption in our industry, fundamentally changing how we're thinking, how we're making decisions, and how we're running the company.”
I think if the new structure they where they split by vehicle type can mask the losses in ICE in certain regions while they justify moah subsidies in EVs (They only sold ~1,300 F-150 lightings) since they aren't making money. A Ford spin off being a startup deserving venture capital is quite laughable.
 
How on earth did Ford manage to lose money on EVs even with all that subsidy money the Government was handing them?
 
How on earth did Ford manage to lose money on EVs even with all that subsidy money the Government was handing them?
I would say research costs, large corpo deadweight, and low sales. How Ford thought it's main customer base* of muh lifted pickups or heavy duty hauling diesel fellers wanted an EV was commercially viable boggles my mind.
*Let's be real here, people who drive compacts either go European or Asian.
 
How on earth did Ford manage to lose money on EVs even with all that subsidy money the Government was handing them?
I'd like to point out they're losing money on a car WITH A WAITING LIST TO BUY.
Also they feel cheap as hell. I think I could pull off the charge port cover with my hands and the accent headlights look like something from a trailer's kitchen.
 
I'd like to point out they're losing money on a car WITH A WAITING LIST TO BUY.
Also they feel cheap as hell. I think I could pull off the charge port cover with my hands and the accent headlights look like something from a trailer's kitchen.
Yeah but how much is that Ford limiting production to make the market artificially scarce versus retardation?
 
That would only make sense if they were making money.
You imply that Ford isn't retarded.
I think it's a case of Ford trying to play catch up and having a bunch of issues in production. Tesla has not done ICE before so it does not have "institutional knowledge" that would need to be forgotten. Granted you're the feller in the automotive industry so you tell me...

Also I saw an article about a guy whose rivian broke after getting towed out of the snow, and it cost him 7k because it basically detected the weight coming off the driver side and bricked the transmission..... If that's the quality of a Ford EV I think I'll strap a battery and a motor to my bicycle instead.
 
You imply that Ford isn't retarded.
I think it's a case of Ford trying to play catch up and having a bunch of issues in production. Tesla has not done ICE before so it does not have "institutional knowledge" that would need to be forgotten. Granted you're the feller in the automotive industry so you tell me...
They're hiring fresh off the boat pajeets and making them program control software rather than training their old and expensive programmers to to EV's.
Also I saw an article about a guy whose rivian broke after getting towed out of the snow, and it cost him 7k because it basically detected the weight coming off the driver side and bricked the transmission..... If that's the quality of a Ford EV I think I'll strap a battery and a motor to my bicycle instead.
Probably a good bet. People should know to never buy a car the first year or the first model from a company with new technology.
 
Nah, they’ll just be nationalized.
Probably, but at some point the gravy train will have to stop.

The end of FIAT in 2023 still looks likely.

Get them BTC's in!

EDIT:


If you can't see the link it reads:

Nationwide blackout of phones in Switzerland
Deutsch Bank is crashing. Run on bank in progress
FIVE bank failures in less than a month: -
Silvergate - Silicon Valley Bank - Signature Bank - First Republic. - Credit Suisse
Now Deutsche Bank
 
Last edited:
Unless the Media were trying to contact Switzerland and couldn't get through for some reason!

TBH I use Crypto and haven't got an issue with it - it is what it is and if it's good enough for The Farms...
 
Thread Tax :
SEC. 3. ADDRESSING INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY PRODUCTS AND SERVICES THAT POSE UNDUE OR UNACCEPTABLE RISK.

(a) In General.—The Secretary, in consultation with the relevant executive department and agency heads, is authorized to and shall take action to identify, deter, disrupt, prevent, prohibit, investigate, or otherwise mitigate, including by negotiating, entering into, or imposing, and enforcing any mitigation measure to address any risk arising from any covered transaction by any person, or with respect to any property, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States that the Secretary determines—
(1) poses an undue or unacceptable risk of—
(A) sabotage or subversion of the design, integrity, manufacturing, production, distribution, installation, operation, or maintenance of information and communications technology products and services in the United States;
(B) catastrophic effects on the security or resilience of the critical infrastructure or digital economy of the United States;
(C) interfering in, or altering the result or reported result of a Federal election, as determined in coordination with the Attorney General, the Director of National Intelligence, the Secretary of Treasury, and the Federal Election Commission; or
(D) coercive or criminal activities by a foreign adversary that are designed to undermine democratic processes and institutions or steer policy and regulatory decisions in favor of the strategic objectives of a foreign adversary to the detriment of the national security of the United States, as determined in coordination with the Attorney General, the Director of National Intelligence, the Secretary of Treasury, and the Federal Election Commission; or
(2) otherwise poses an undue or unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States or the safety of United States persons.
"[...] or imposing, and enforcing any mitigation measure to address any risk arising from any covered transaction by any person, or with respect to any property, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States [...]"

Is this a shot at crypto?
They're hiring fresh off the boat pajeets and making them program control software rather than training their old and expensive programmers to to EV's.
Thanks, I'll stick with the old Ford 300 with timing gears.
 
Just remember, Canam, it'll be rules for thee and not for me.
No shit. People cannot monitor something they cannot understand, nor even comprehend the scale of.

First Republic bailout coming? (Archive)
One day after a lengthy meeting on the growing bank crisis by the Financial Stability Oversight Council (chaired by Janet Yellen who five years ago vowed there would be "no financial crises in her lifetime") on the last day of a week which started with the collapse of Credit Suisse and culminated with US regional banks nursing historic losses amid speculation that First Republic Bank could keel over any moment and drag down countless other names with it, even though the FSOC assured Americans that "while some institutions have come under stress, the U.S. banking system remains sound and resilient", Bloomberg reports that in their attempt to rescue the most trouble of regionals, authorities are considering expanding the recently introduced emergency lending facility for banks - the BTFP - in order to give First Republic Bank more time to shore up its balance sheet.

Or they may not:
after all this has been a crisis has been marked by at times puzzling second-guessing, miscommunication and lack of conviction on the part of regulators, whose actions not only precipitated the contagion from the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank when they blocked potential buyers from acquiring the bank and avoiding a complete wipeout of shareholders, but where Janet Yellen has actively sought to destabilize the regional banks by explicitly refuting what Fed chair Powell was stating, the most vivid example being last Wednesday's market crunch when stocks stabilized after the dovish FOMC only to puke after Yellen inexplicably said that US regulators were not even contemplating uniform deposit insurance.

And sure enough, the BBG report adds that "officials have yet to decide on what support they could provide First Republic, if any, and an expansion of the Federal Reserve’s offering is one of several options being weighed at this early stage." Meanwhile, regulators continue to grapple with two other failed lenders — Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank — that require more immediate attention... attention they wouldn't need if regulators had intervened more competently in the beginning and not waited until almost a trillion in deposits had been pulled from small banks as confidence cratered.



Bizarrely, even without of a step, watchdogs see First Republic as stable enough to operate without any immediate intervention as the company and its advisers try to work out a deal to shore up its balance sheet, the people said, asking not to be named discussing confidential talks.

Officials have yet to decide on what support they could provide First Republic, if any, and an expansion of the Federal Reserve’s offering is one of several options being weighed at this early stage. Regulators continue to grapple with two other failed lenders — Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank — that require more immediate attention.

Even short of expanding the BTFP, regulators reportedly "see First Republic as stable enough to operate without any immediate intervention as the company and its advisers try to work out a deal to shore up its balance sheet"; maybe those regulators should also see the stock price of FRC which has lost more than 90% of its value, and which is far less confident about the bank's ability to evade the same forces that recently caused a trio of US banks to collapse. But while those banks toppled when rapid customer withdrawals forced them to lock in losses on depreciated assets, First Republic has remained open and independent.

And while the BBG reporting suggests that regulators are once again indecisive at best, and may either help the bank... or not, the only actionable news here is that US officials "have concluded the bank’s deposits are stabilizing and that it isn’t susceptible to the kind of sudden, severe run that prompted regulators to seize Silicon Valley Bank within just a few days, the people said." This confirms what we first reported on Friday in "Finally Some Good News On The Bank Crisis."

One way First Republic is different from other banks is that it managed to obtain enough cash to meet client needs while it explores solutions, courtesy of $30 billion in cash deposited by the nation’s largest banks this month... which of course is merely cash that was recycled after it was pulled from banks such as First Republic in the first place.

Bloomberg also notes that a potential adjustment to the Fed's emergency lending program is among options authorities have weighed in recent days. Of course, such an expansion of the Fed’s liquidity offerings would merely be another incremental step to institutionalizing moral hazard as it would apply to all eligible users, in keeping with banking law that says remedies must be broadly based, rather than aimed at helping a particular bank. But the change could be made in a way to ensure that First Republic benefits.
I'm not convinced that 1st Rep is out of the waters yet. Unless that closed meeting yesterday was about another bank (Maybe Deutsche Bank?). This administration's opaqueness and schizophrenic stances make it all more confusing and is exacerbating the volatility.
I am leaning towards this muddying of the water being malicious rather than by sheer incompetence.

I know people shit on ZH for being doomers consistently, but at least they are willing to explore avenues of thought most other writers otherwise would not do so openly.
 
Rumors have been swirling about DB for years now, just like with Credit Suisse. They are up to their necks in Sus financial dealings. People have been worried about their solvency for years now. It's why I asked for someone to do a welfare check on them when the CS stuff started going down.

Apparently I wasn't the only one. Tinkerbell economics coming home to roost. People don't trust DB, so the belief in their solvency is broken. And modern money theory requires perfect belief in value. If that belief is broken it fails.

I would not want to be a DB depositor next week.
 
Apparently I wasn't the only one. Tinkerbell economics coming home to roost. People don't trust DB, so the belief in their solvency is broken. And modern money theory requires perfect belief in value. If that belief is broken it fails.
DB still makes money...

I would not want to be a DB depositor next week.
there will be no crisis, the ECB and the EU will do EVERYTHING they can to prevent any crisis, even if it means a overnight rate cut and QE.

A Bankrun at germanies biggest bank would mean the the end to the current german government coalition with a gurantee that the next government would be alot less Pro EU and anti ECB.
 
Back
Top Bottom