I'm a rightoid myself, but I was discussing with a friend recently about how I think leftist extremism fuels rightoid extremism. The leftist's approach to an uncomfortable issue is to ignore it entirely and deflect, blaming "more privileged groups" as a scapegoat, like how they blame everything in the world on cis straight white men. If a black man abandons his kids, then a leftist will still blame a random white man for it, because "systematic racism" or something. The right then becomes reactionary as a result to it as an overcorrection, which alienates normies. I consider myself a race realist, which means I do believe races have different biological characteristics, even if those differences, like IQ, are uncomfortable to address. But there's also more nuance to race than low-IQ Nick Fuentes fans realize. It's especially difficult to solve the multiculturalism problem because of how much race-mixing has happened over the past century. It was easier when less mutts existed, but now if we were to have a white-only community, we have to address what percentage of white is required and what is deemed as white enough. Multiculturalism is a failed experiment, and I wish we all stayed in our own homelands without this migration mess, but we're sadly too late in the game to reverse things at this point. So continuing to harp on that fact, especially if you're a brown-skinned Mexican, who wouldn't be allowed in Hyperborea anyway, is pointless. We need new solutions. You can discuss race realism in a more intellectual manner that will appeal more to normies, but groypers are not doing that and their chimping out is making more sensible people on the right look like a joke by association.