Crazy Christians

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Sorry to double post, but I just wanted to explain some of the Scientology stuff, why people fall for it.

People have to approach Scientology with the mindset that they want to be helped, they want it to help them. If you go in and read Dianetics with a critical mind you'll of course think it's total bullshit because it is. But if you're seriously looking for help and want that book to help you you'll find things of worth in it. It especially caters to a certain kind of person, because Dianetics basically tells you that you've always suspected you're unique and special and guess what? YOU ARE. That was basically how people got in in the days of yore.

Now people are drawn in by free personality tests. Scientologists ask you hundreds of questions and of course there is ALWAYS something drastically wrong with you... but guess what? They can fix it all! They show you their introductory movie which can be found on youtube and isn't too crazy (although I literally snorted water out of my nose when they claimed that religion is generally peaceful. Because, you know, it's not like any major wars were ever started over religion). If that doesn't scare you off, the cult behaviour begins. The love bombing in particular, where they flatter and cajole and encourage. They get you doing (and paying for) the basic coursework and of course you get massive "wins" in Scientology lingo,. This is in stark contrast to when you are in deep, where you basically never get enough stats.

It is VERY gradual. We all know about the crazy Xenu shit, but they don't tell you about that until you are literally at the highest level of financial obligation spiritual enlightenment and you're in so deep you've paid hundreds of thousands of dollars (bare minimum) to get there. Also, they teach the members that if they expose themselves to the super sekrit shit they will quite literally die. LRH only survived because he's LRH. So that's a good incentive to not spoil yourself.

There is also a MASSIVE culture of 'don't ask questions' in Scientology and most of their drills are about letting go of the critical mind and just accepting things as they are. If you ask questions you're labeled PTS - potential trouble source - and you're likely to be booted off to Clearwater to pay thousands of dollars to be audited to sort out your "problems".

So thanks to careful use of classic cult tactics - the love bombing, encouraging with big spiritual gains, only releasing so much information at a time, only letting members learn the most insane shit when you're sure they're in deep - people do believe and they believe hard.

You definitely hit that right on the head. Scientology is one of the most deviously sneaky brands of bullshit around, that's for sure. Their cult managers know their shit. But I think most types of cults work like North Korea: very few people REALLY believe the bullshit beyond a certain age, despite being brought up saturated in it. They just continue to cooperate out of fear. If you speak out against it, you will likely disappear forever in both NK and in Scientology and in lots of other cults. Fear controls people better than genuine belief.

(Also, sorry for being absent! Been working on a few projects lately.)
 
I want to present to you the fundy version of the SJW: One Million Moms. These busy-bodies are on constant crusades to end anything that is offensive to them and their religion (it doesn't even matter how late it is on TV). One of the latest is claiming how a Guinness ad is offensive to Christians because they used a wordless hymn as background music. Personally, I think the ad is very touching.
 
I want to present to you the fundy version of the SJW: One Million Moms. These busy-bodies are on constant crusades to end anything that is offensive to them and their religion (it doesn't even matter how late it is on TV). One of the latest is claiming how a Guinness ad is offensive to Christians because they used a wordless hymn as background music. Personally, I think the ad is very touching.

I would take their Christ God more seriously if he was not so easily offended.
 
I want to present to you the fundy version of the SJW: One Million Moms. These busy-bodies are on constant crusades to end anything that is offensive to them and their religion (it doesn't even matter how late it is on TV). One of the latest is claiming how a Guinness ad is offensive to Christians because they used a wordless hymn as background music. Personally, I think the ad is very touching.

Weren't they the group that threatened to boycott...I dunno, JC Penny because of Ellen Degeneres?
 
I don't think that God is actually offended that easily(speaking as a Catholic), it's just that fundamentalists seem to have hair trigger tempers because ITS ALL DORK SIDED!!!
Since the deity I and other Christians worship (or claim to worship) is an all knowing being, I'm sure God would find offense is something else than a commercial. You could say that these commercials are triggering to these sort of people since they are a fundy version of the SJW's as one said.
 
After reading this thread, I consider myself fortunate that although I grew up in a somewhat devout family, at least fun was allowed. That cross thing is... WTF.
 
Last edited:
Let's balance out the crazy Protestant Christians with some crazy Catholic Christians, shall we? Like Tim Haines.

Tim, a Long Island tryhard with a stiffie for papal authority and a mortal fear of being emasculated, calls himself "Vericast, the hardest-hitting Catholic podcast on or off the Internet!" (Can you even have a podcast off the Internet?)

The rest of us, however, call him "Evil Condom Guy."


TL;DR - "Condoms are evil because the Church says so!" That's not a paraphrase, unfortunately, that's a direct quote.
 
Since the deity I and other Christians worship (or claim to worship) is an all knowing being, I'm sure God would find offense is something else than a commercial. You could say that these commercials are triggering to these sort of people since they are a fundy version of the SJW's as one said.
Fundies mirror SJWs in a lot of ways. I made a venn diagram in the old SJW thread of all the different types, and there was a good reason I overlapped a large section of the religious right with SJWs. I've seen more appeals to political correctness (even if they don't call it that) from fundies than from liberals.

The biggest differences are that SJWs just have internet drama. Fundies have IRL power. SJWs are mostly teenagers who will grow out of it. Fundies are old fucks who won't.
 
Anybody familiar with this guy:
TCPict144x180.jpg


His name is Thomas A. Carder and he's a pastor. Not that there's anything wrong with that but I'm thinking maybe a better haircut, glasses and shaving off the pornstache would improve his looks. No, the reason I bring him up is because of his website in all it's Geocities HTML glory: http://www.capalert.com/. More importantly it's his movie "reviews" found here: http://www.capalert.com/capreports/index.htm.

He's developed an "objective" system known as the "W.I.S.D.O.M." method that measures all the bad things in a movie and once he counts them all up gives the movie a score and based on that score he then assigns a rating. The higher the rating, the "better" the movie. So a movie like "Marry Poppins" gets 100. A movie like "American Psycho" gets a 0. And a movie like "South Park: Bigger, Longer, Uncut" gets a 29. But that's only part of it. The real thing is the "CAP ID" which measures how much bad stuff goes on during it. As such South Park has a CAP ID of 10.65 meaning, as far as he's concerned, it's the absolute worst movie out there. Personally I think it's hilarious and still stands up as some of the best social satire out there but then Tommy Boy doesn't seem to get satire.
 
Anybody familiar with this guy:
TCPict144x180.jpg


His name is Thomas A. Carder and he's a pastor. Not that there's anything wrong with that but I'm thinking maybe a better haircut, glasses and shaving off the pornstache would improve his looks. No, the reason I bring him up is because of his website in all it's Geocities HTML glory: http://www.capalert.com/. More importantly it's his movie "reviews" found here: http://www.capalert.com/capreports/index.htm.

He's developed an "objective" system known as the "W.I.S.D.O.M." method that measures all the bad things in a movie and once he counts them all up gives the movie a score and based on that score he then assigns a rating. The higher the rating, the "better" the movie. So a movie like "Marry Poppins" gets 100. A movie like "American Psycho" gets a 0. And a movie like "South Park: Bigger, Longer, Uncut" gets a 29. But that's only part of it. The real thing is the "CAP ID" which measures how much bad stuff goes on during it. As such South Park has a CAP ID of 10.65 meaning, as far as he's concerned, it's the absolute worst movie out there. Personally I think it's hilarious and still stands up as some of the best social satire out there but then Tommy Boy doesn't seem to get satire.

The Christian movie reviewers always get my goat because they knowingly subject themselves to what is considered foul and sinful to their own religion. The corruption of a mind is as easy to accomplish as the body and yet the knowingly subject themselves to these things which the Bible condemns. Like, you can use the movie rating system or word of mouth to go 'Oh hey, this has violence, nudity, or heathenism in it. We shouldn't watch because Jesus doesn't like those things'. There is no such thing as participating in a condemned activity and it not counting toward your arbitrary sins. It is what it is and there isn't a grey area.
 
Let's balance out the crazy Protestant Christians with some crazy Catholic Christians, shall we? Like Tim Haines.

Tim, a Long Island tryhard with a stiffie for papal authority and a mortal fear of being emasculated, calls himself "Vericast, the hardest-hitting Catholic podcast on or off the Internet!" (Can you even have a podcast off the Internet?)

The rest of us, however, call him "Evil Condom Guy."

https://youtube.com/watch?v=oNZ9dR5psj4
TL;DR - "Condoms are evil because the Church says so!" That's not a paraphrase, unfortunately, that's a direct quote.

Let's hope no one is stupid enough to breed with him.

Or an STD teaches him a lesson.
 
Anybody familiar with this guy:
He's developed an "objective" system known as the "W.I.S.D.O.M." method that measures all the bad things in a movie and once he counts them all up gives the movie a score and based on that score he then assigns a rating. The higher the rating, the "better" the movie. So a movie like "Marry Poppins" gets 100. A movie like "American Psycho" gets a 0. And a movie like "South Park: Bigger, Longer, Uncut" gets a 29. But that's only part of it. The real thing is the "CAP ID" which measures how much bad stuff goes on during it. As such South Park has a CAP ID of 10.65 meaning, as far as he's concerned, it's the absolute worst movie out there. Personally I think it's hilarious and still stands up as some of the best social satire out there but then Tommy Boy doesn't seem to get satire.

It's interesting how he will make excuses for Mary Poppins when any other film with the same stuff would get blasted by him.
 
It's interesting how he will make excuses for Mary Poppins when any other film with the same stuff would get blasted by him.
Would it be possible if he actually had some sort of fetish for Mary Poppins?
 
Kent Hovind as in 10 years in Federal Pound Me in the Ass Prison for tax evasion.

But it's just persecution for being a Creationist. Yet Banana Man and his pal Kirk Cameron walk free as does Ken Ham.
 
Kent Hovind as in 10 years in Federal Pound Me in the Ass Prison for tax evasion.

But it's just persecution for being a Creationist. Yet Banana Man and his pal Kirk Cameron walk free as does Ken Ham.

Feed them to crocoducks.
 
Back
Top Bottom