Countering Extremism Working Group - You're a Republican? Well, that'll be punishable by the UCMJ.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Well, it's finally coming.

Bishop Garrison, a former Clinton and Obama administration figure, a 1619 Program supporter, and well known for saying that if you supported Trump you're a racist, white nationalist, and extremist, is now leading the "Countering Extremism Working Group" for the Pentagon.

The list of "extremist imagery" also has the "Come and Take It" flag, and a lot of the extremist 'identification' is pretty much believing in the US, questioning the government, asking if the US is capable of defeating a near-peer opponent.


extreme-1.jpg

extreme-2.jpg

extreme-3.jpg

The big thing is they plan to change the UCMJ, and every time I hear that, I cringe. The UCMJ is already harsh and controlling, and the idea of changing it to outlaw "extremism" when there's already mechanisms for anti-American activities, is frankly a little worrying.

Well, who is Garrison?

Well, he's on Human Rights First: https://www.humanrightsfirst.org/biography/bishop-garrison

Here he is on Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/bishopgarrison

Have an article of race-baiting written by him: https://inkstickmedia.com/racism-is-an-existential-threat/

Another interesting thing is that Garrison wants these changes pushed through fast. The document is listed at 9 Apr 2021, and want changes put in place and implemented within 90 days of 14 April 2021.

It's funny. Garrison there benefited from one of the most meritocratic organizations in America and immediately is turning around, screaming racism, and trying to tear it apart. I guess that combat tour between 2003-2004 and his "150 missions" must have really exposed him to some serious racists in the ranks.

His Twitter: https://twitter.com/bishopgarrison?lang=en

@JosephStalin and I remember when the thought of something like this would have been laughed off.

And since I once saw a senior office go ballistic over an "Eddie" poster from "The Trooper" by Iron Maiden, I don't have much confidence of senior military leaders identifying extremism outside of "White people bad" and mistaking the Union Jack for the Confederate flag.
 

Attachments

You again completely misunderstand me. I am absolutely not at all advocating for the adoption of their tactics. Merely that its a good idea to read their books to learn how to counter theirs.
Consider me Emily Litella.
 
You again completely misunderstand me. I am absolutely not at all advocating for the adoption of their tactics. Merely that its a good idea to read their books to learn how to counter theirs.
At this moment? Just bunker up and wait for society to collapse.

Alot of people seem hell bent on doing that any ways.

American conservativism (and whites) thrive extremely well in frontier conditions.
 
Republicans are the eternal optics cucks, so I guarantee they got a RINO that knows how to be a bit quieter about things to take her place.
Doubt it. Lindsey Graham has said this week that 'Trump is the leader of the Republican party chosen by the Conservative people of America' and 'There is no future without Trump and if you try to erase Trump you will be erased.'
 
Personally, I'd argue that they're more of an active part of the agenda. It would be kind of like if you were on trial and your prosecutor got to pick your defense attorney for you.
I am convinced most will never break free of the false notion that the two party system is their only choice. For those who maintain the farce, there is very, very good reason as to why the alternative (and actual answer so many good people seek without realizing) is never allowed to be discussed (even in "the land of the free") without being demonized or misrepresented.

To further illustrate the point:
neither side is the answer.jpg neither side is the answer 1.jpg

This is as far as most will ever get in this thought process, because they don't even realize there's another way. Their minds are completely shaped and bound to falsehood. If you fall into this camp (be honest with yourself), then I beg you to educate yourself more. Whitey (in particular) has been lied to about this for ~4 generations and it is the only path forward that does not result in ruin..like it or not. Stop buying into the bullshit, and dare to be your own person.

Edit:
Their tactics are never worth using.
I keep seeing this dimwitted attitude here among certain posters-- "why don't we learn from BLM and fight dirty?" Because "fighting dirty" is why they are bad. Becoming a thuggish mob to own the thuggish mob is no victory.
I'm sorry, but this reeks of moral grandstanding. What good is the high road if all it's doing is allowing those who seek to destroy your nation to continue doing so? Is it truly a high road at that point, or is it complacency? Apathy? What do you propose to do instead? Try to vote (lmao) our way out of this mess? In being unwilling to engage in effective means of getting the point across, you are preemptively admitting defeat. Another example: Subversion is an incredibly effective (and arguably nonviolent) tool of the enemy. Why is this seen as bad to then turn around and use for the benefit of good-yet-fed-up people?

Where have our teeth gone, as a nation (especially as a people)? Why sit on our hands and just..watch it all burn without any plan for correcting course? For restoration? How can so many people not see how badly they've been browbeaten into submission that the very idea of so much as lifting a finger is seen as taboo?
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry, but this reeks of moral grandstanding. What good is the high road if all it's doing is allowing those who seek to destroy your nation to continue doing so? Is it truly a high road at that point, or is it complacency? Apathy? What do you propose to do instead? Try to vote (lmao) our way out of this mess? In being unwilling to engage in effective means of getting the point across, you are preemptively admitting defeat. Another example: Subversion is an incredibly effective (and arguably nonviolent) tool of the enemy. Why is this seen as bad to then turn around and use for the benefit of good-yet-fed-up people?
The answer to idpol and the subversion and destruction of institutions is not idpol and the subversion and destruction of institutions. Or to quote some leftist big brain: "You cannot tear down the master's house using the master's tools." Subversion cannot end subversion and idpol cannot end idpol. Trying to pull that exact same shit is just going to make things worse and more destructive overall. Do you want acceleration? That's how you get acceleration.
 
Do you want acceleration?
Do you see any other way out? And I don't mean kicking the can down the road for your kids or grandkids, either. I mean breaking out of this mess altogether.
 
I'm sorry, but this reeks of moral grandstanding. What good is the high road if all it's doing is allowing those who seek to destroy your nation to continue doing so? Is it truly a high road at that point, or is it complacency? Apathy? What do you propose to do instead? Try to vote (lmao) our way out of this mess? In being unwilling to engage in effective means of getting the point across, you are preemptively admitting defeat. Another example: Subversion is an incredibly effective (and arguably nonviolent) tool of the enemy. Why is this seen as bad to then turn around and use for the benefit of good-yet-fed-up people?

Where have our teeth gone, as a nation (especially as a people)? Why sit on our hands and just..watch it all burn without any plan for correcting course? For restoration? How can so many people not see how badly they've been browbeaten into submission that the very idea of so much as lifting a finger is seen as taboo?

"In order to fight the enemies of reason and justice, we must abandon reason and justice" --The Coward's Creed

Snekposter is correct that understanding commie scum tactics is valuable. My misunderstanding was that he was saying what a lot of you dumb faggots say, essentially that we should imitate commie scum.
 
"In order to fight the enemies of reason and justice, we must abandon reason and justice" --The Coward's Creed

Snekposter is correct that understanding commie scum tactics is valuable. My misunderstanding was that he was saying what a lot of you dumb faggots say, essentially that we should imitate commie scum.

There are some ideas marxists used that ought to be used but the biggest issue with copying is the Right is not psychologically similar to the left.

For example the left tends to infiltrate any group to gain influence, resources and power. Even if its just a knitting group they will hijack it.

Actually they seem to focus on things people dont care or pay attention to at first.

They also focus on changing things for sake of change to aoften the ground. Once things get more fluid is when they direct change in a more deliberate, direct and coherent fashion.

Its very effective.

The problem is motivation. The left will so it on their own out of politics. That doesnt work with the right. They dont organize into action. Every attempt to make something centered around politics fails for the right.

What does work with the right is mentorship. One guy gets in an industry and then teaches a bunch of proteges. Like lets say an artist figures iut a new way to paint. Then selects a bunch of artists of the next generation to learn then technique. This how the right works when it wants to change something.
 
There are some ideas marxists used that ought to be used but the biggest issue with copying is the Right is not psychologically similar to the left.

For example the left tends to infiltrate any group to gain influence, resources and power. Even if its just a knitting group they will hijack it.

Actually they seem to focus on things people dont care or pay attention to at first.

They also focus on changing things for sake of change to aoften the ground. Once things get more fluid is when they direct change in a more deliberate, direct and coherent fashion.

Its very effective.

The problem is motivation. The left will so it on their own out of politics. That doesnt work with the right. They dont organize into action. Every attempt to make something centered around politics fails for the right.

What does work with the right is mentorship. One guy gets in an industry and then teaches a bunch of proteges. Like lets say an artist figures iut a new way to paint. Then selects a bunch of artists of the next generation to learn then technique. This how the right works when it wants to change something.
Also, the Left is more than willing to lie and shed crocodile tears to advance their agenda. To them, the ends justify the means.

The Right, meanwhile, naively thinks that as long as they play fair, the Left will do likewise. Thus, they restrain themselves because they have consciences.

Conservatives understand liberals better than vice-versa. The Right sees the Left as well-meaning but misguided people with legitimate concerns, while the Left sees the Right as racist/sexist/fascist poopyhead meanies on the Wrong Side of History.

In short, the Right are not necessarily cucks, but rather, the Left are sociopaths.
 
Last edited:
Also, the Left is more than willing to lie and shed crocodile tears to advance their agenda. To them, the ends justify the means.

The Right, meanwhile, naively thinks that as long as they play fair, the Left will do likewise. Thus, they restrain themselves. Not because they're cucks, but because they have consciences.

Conservatives understand liberals better than vice-versa. The Right sees the Left as well-meaning but misguided people with legitimate concerns, while the Left sees the Right as racist/sexist/fascist poopyhead meanies on the Wrong Side of History.

In short, the Right are not necessarily cucks, but rather, the Left are sociopaths.
Ok lets take my idea and apply it to you.

Lets say you know a bunch of people from church. Ok you take the time to teach some job skills. Then you find them a boss whose willing to take on people who dont have credentials for skilled work but vetted by word of mouth.

This how you organize the right.
 
Conservatism is based, insofar as it is the conservatism of a free republic and not that of a bootlicking fascist regime, on virtue. Courage, honor, and faith are not compatible with skullduggery. Fear of defeat cannot lead one to abandon one's principles, else that one is despicable and not worth saving.

Marxists are materialists who see wealth and freedom from toil as the only good things in life. Their selfishness and blindness is apparent to those with any wisdom, and that is their weakness, as has always been the case with such persons since long before Marx was ever born. Alcibiades would have fit right in with the current Democrat party.
 
I'm just gonna say that if you handed me that signature on a blank piece of paper I would assume the signatory was mentally retarded. Apparently even more than I would assume since they're a government official. Can we just have a government of all downsies please? Sure shit would get bad real fast but at least CSPAN would become the best comedy network in television history.
 
I am convinced most will never break free of the false notion that the two party system is their only choice. For those who maintain the farce, there is very, very good reason as to why the alternative (and actual answer so many good people seek without realizing) is never allowed to be discussed (even in "the land of the free") without being demonized or misrepresented.

To further illustrate the point:
View attachment 2163771View attachment 2163774

This is as far as most will ever get in this thought process, because they don't even realize there's another way. Their minds are completely shaped and bound to falsehood. If you fall into this camp (be honest with yourself), then I beg you to educate yourself more. Whitey (in particular) has been lied to about this for ~4 generations and it is the only path forward that does not result in ruin..like it or not. Stop buying into the bullshit, and dare to be your own person.

Edit:


I'm sorry, but this reeks of moral grandstanding. What good is the high road if all it's doing is allowing those who seek to destroy your nation to continue doing so? Is it truly a high road at that point, or is it complacency? Apathy? What do you propose to do instead? Try to vote (lmao) our way out of this mess? In being unwilling to engage in effective means of getting the point across, you are preemptively admitting defeat. Another example: Subversion is an incredibly effective (and arguably nonviolent) tool of the enemy. Why is this seen as bad to then turn around and use for the benefit of good-yet-fed-up people?

Where have our teeth gone, as a nation (especially as a people)? Why sit on our hands and just..watch it all burn without any plan for correcting course? For restoration? How can so many people not see how badly they've been browbeaten into submission that the very idea of so much as lifting a finger is seen as taboo?
Theres this book titled Grand Illusion: The Myth of Voter Choice in a Two-Party Tyranny
By amatory

Check it out
 
Back
Top Bottom