Culture Conservatives are more attractive than liberals, study finds - Or: - Explains Chris, feminists, soyboys and SJWs perfectly.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://www.indy100.com/article/con...tter-rolfe-daus-peterson-carl-palmaer-8181196

"Hot people are more likely to support right-wing parties because they are stronger and more successful than their more liberal peers, apparently.


That's according to a study carried out by Rolfe Daus Peterson, a political scholar from Susquehanna University and Carl Palmar, assistant professor in politics at Illinois State University.


The researchers claim that never before has the effects of physical attractiveness on politics been examined on this level and that there is "good reason to believe that individuals’ physical attractiveness may alter their political values and worldviews".


They said that their findings prove attractive people tend to lean towards the right because they have better social skills and are more popular, competent and intelligent due to the "halo effect" - an idea that bias and stereotypes influence the way people judge others.


Writing about their findings in the Politics and Life Sciences journal published in December 2017, the pair said that on average, hotter people have an easier life so don't see the need for more welfare, aid and government support, unlike their left-wing counterparts.

...

Attractive people tend to be conservative because of a 'blind spot'

The scholars said hot people lean towards the right because they grow to develop a blind spot that leads them to not see the need for more government support or aid in society - a core liberal value.


They add that attractive people don’t face the same hurdles as others as their attractiveness gains them more attention and they are more successful in social situations. Their lives are generally “easier,” the pair claim.

Even though this blind spot may not be universally held and physically attractive individuals do not always have easier lives, on average, physically attractive individuals face fewer hurdles navigating the social world.

They conclude that because of this, they expect attractive people to be more likely to support right-wing conservative parties and point to another study that concluded that conservatives are more attractive."



Thoughts?
 
Wait why am I not hot then. I've been cheated!


...
I think it's funny they're confirming what we already knew.
 
As if this wasn't obvious. Ultra leftist retards are all body odour and no pheromones.
:story: They're beta everythings for a reason.
 
Be honest. How many male feminists have you seen in the gym lifting?
No wonder they've always been playing FOX News when I've been going to the gym

Side note, I'm fairly left leaning, and I'm certainly no MCU bodybuilder(nor am I trying to be), but I'm probably in better shape than the average nu-male and I can safely say I lack the visibly receding hairline characteristic of that crowd.
 
The study failed to account for rednecks and religious fundies. Those two groups are overwhelmingly conservative but who would accuse them of being attractive? And this doesn't seem to explain California, you have tons of attractive people there with economic and social positions so nonsensically left that you'll wonder if tumblr had founded a colony in the US. Plus, the study could also be thrown off by the definition of attraction. The democratic party is filled with black people and hispanics and if you're looking for swedish supermodels you'll end up deciding that democrats are uglier on average.

What if people's political affiliation had everything to do with location and local culture and nothing to do with appearance?
 
Well no shit. I mean it's pretty obvious that the right wing chad is far better than the soyboy bugman virgin of the left, not like there needs to be an article about it or anything.

maxresdefault.jpg

uWx62iWzES-iABbvPeFE8hfcksH4OsbKH1Zys9XfdpY.jpg
 
This just sounds like a long-winded "they don't care about the proletariat!" pile of bullshit. I'm a black-pilled centrist civnat ffs.
 
TBH, when one group adheres to ideals of beauty that have lasted us hundreds of years and the other actively try to subvert those to show how progresive they are there is really never any contest.

Give me a man in a suit any day of the week.
 
The study failed to account for rednecks and religious fundies. Those two groups are overwhelmingly conservative but who would accuse them of being attractive? And this doesn't seem to explain California, you have tons of attractive people there with economic and social positions so nonsensically left that you'll wonder if tumblr had founded a colony in the US.

Not sure about the fundies, but I think the California thing (or at least the Hollywood thing) can be explained by the fact that attractive people don't necessarily stay conservative or may not even get that far into it in the first place--especially not if they're in an environment where a key part of their attractiveness is professing the correct ideals for that environment. If their fame is part of what makes them attractive, and maintaining left-wing ideals is part of maintaining that fame and hence attractiveness, they never get far enough into that "halo effect" to turn conservative. Hence a class that is attractive but, unable to break from left-wing ideology and see themselves as independent agents, a bunch of perpetual victims.

... Everything I just typed was stupid. My head hurts.
 
427.jpg

Couldn't avoid posting it, like CWC says, it's all coming full circle.
I wonder if this is more of a psychological thing, like with OPL in the past. He thought he was the most attractive thing since stripper heels, but after being confronted with reality, he became more of a liberal because he just couldn't measure up. Ugly people need liberalism, it's their only shot at getting banged one of these days.
 
Back
Top Bottom