Opinion Complacent About Replacement - The majority of Americans are still not pissed off enough about illegal migrants

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

To be blunt, this is what it feels like to be conquered. The British have been through it a couple of times, their kingdoms falling to the Romans, the Vikings, making deals and accepting new cultures that obliterated the former. Societies that survive too long lose themselves in their comfort and become complacent about their replacement. It happened to the Aztecs, the Inca, the Mayans, the Apache, the Comanche and the Sioux, who did it to others before that.

Every single landmass has been invaded and conquered. The Marxists use that as a source of guilt, by calling it “stealing” which it never has been. If the United States had actually been a conqueror, as the Marxists suggest, it would have kept Mexico when it won the war in 1846, instead of just maintaining the landmass that it had before the war, but including the state of Texas after the Republic of Texas voted to join the United States.

If Americans were the evil land “stealers” they are made out to be, they would have invaded and conquered Canada after they beat the British in both the Revolutionary War and the War of 1812, leaving out that owned by the French. They would have kept Japan after WWII, much the same as Russia had claimed Alaska. Americans don’t want an empire and never have, not that the US Government hasn’t wanted to extend its influence globally and have made vassal states out of a number of nations along the way. The U.S. could have kept half of Europe and Eastern Europe, if they had thought it would not have put them at odds with Russia and started another war right after WWII, but they did have sole possession of the atom bomb and could have won that war, too. The American people were sick of war and yearned for peace and prosperity.

The difference between all of that and our current situation, is that the United States government is aiding and abetting our own conquest, encouraging it and paying for it with forced taxation and printed funds. I believe there is a legal means of refusing to pay taxes to the federal government, because they have refused to abide by their obligations to maintain borders, ensure the welfare of the people and been woefully negligent in acting in the fiduciary interest of the American people. If we had an actual legal system instead of a corrupt means of punishment, that is.

To get that right, like all of the others, it seems as if we are going to have to demand it at a point of leverage that the American people seem unwilling to employ as yet. This is the break point. We are either going to pay for our own conquest, or we’re going to throw off these criminal masters and engage in either wholesale secession, civil war or a counter-revolution to the bureaucratic dictatorship that has risen up and supplanted representation. Those are the simple choices. Nothing makes this more clear than the recent 1.2 trillion dollar spending bill recently passed, which was done in the face of popular opposition.

The decision to do one or the other, i.e., secession, civil war or counter-revolution will be much easier to make once the internal terrorist attacks start, the forfeiture of property to illegals that put too many aged mothers and fathers in their son’s and daughter’s homes and the rape of daughters and sons become commonplace. I urge the American people not to take it out on those committing the acts, other than in self-defense, but much more so on our own bureaucrats, governors, representatives, senators and presidents. The people who are coming here are doing so out of encouragement by our bureaucracies, congress and president. Not one thing has been done to stop it. Not one. All of the caterwauling about it can now be ignored since in the past year, the congress has allowed the FBI to continue its illegal surveillance on the American people, fought to embolden censorship of our speech, funded the caravans coming from South America and Mexico through the UN, paid to support LGBTQ programs and abortion, funded the lawsuits being waged against Texas to keep the border open.

They are in open hostility toward the American taxpayers, farmers, cattle ranchers, factory owners, automobile manufacturers and oil and gas producers. Not just rhetorical hostility, but regulatory and physical hostility. This is the world we live in; this is the process and methods of conquest to rid the world of the successful and control the low IQ with the brutality they desire to implement on our replacements.

The one thing that has prevented our annihilation thus far is the Second Amendment, but if we are going to sit by and allow them to use every weapon they have to strip that from us as they have every other right listed in the Bill of Rights, then we have no chance of survival and, to be honest, with that ultimate form of leverage in our back pockets, if we still allow our own conquest, we deserve it.
 
Why am I not shocked to find the disgusting fujo running defense for the kinds of people who gangrape girls at the southern border.

Now we know they're okay with pedophiles so long as it's liberals' pets. As if there was any doubt.
 
A handful of hilariously belligerent illegal immigrants

Around one in ten persons living in the USA today is an illegal alien.

The illegals are doing construction, landscaping, stock rooms, cleaning or committing crime all for sub par wages but working together to get the bag. The legals on the other hand, are undercutting everything.

What do you think working for below minimum wage and in violation of local labor, safety, and health laws does, retard?

The US pretty unabashedly conquered the rest of Mexico's North American possessions as part of Guadalupe-Hidalgo, it didn't just keep Texas.

Right, we took the empty land that had virtually no Mexicans in it. There were maybe 20,000 total people in that entire territory. When the Army got to Mexico City, they saw what Mexicans were like and concluded annexing Mexico was a bad idea. It would be more accurate to say that the USA wanted land, but not subjugated peoples to rule. They're just not worth the trouble.
 
That seems too high and yet I believe it.

350m people, between 20m and 50m illegal aliens...with millions more arriving every year under BIden. Their goal is to cram the entire Third World in here, get a court ruling saying they cannot be removed without each one getting an individual trial, and force us to allow them to be the New Reliably Democrat Americans.
 
350m people, between 20m and 50m illegal aliens...with millions more arriving every year under BIden. Their goal is to cram the entire Third World in here, get a court ruling saying they cannot be removed without each one getting an individual trial, and force us to allow them to be the New Reliably Democrat Americans.
What, no mention of the incredible amounts of money that need to be paid out to whatever NGO lawyers represent said illegals?

Awfully anti-Semitic of you sir.
 
For any concern troll tempted to criticise OP's arguments to discourage people from being against mass immigration, remember that in any time other than now, both past and present, if you were to march into someone else's country in the millions, the people of that country would shoot at you and call what you're doing an invasion. And they would be correct. It doesn't matter if you're armed, it doesn't matter how many of the locals you're killing on day-one. An invasion is what it is, and any sane person can see that.
Whether you do it openly or on the down-low by shooting the messenger: If you defend mass immigration, you will be remembered as an idiot who shot himself in the foot. Future generations will know that people like you existed and they will have many laughs at your expense.
 
For any concern troll tempted to criticise OP's arguments to discourage people from being against mass immigration, remember that in any time other than now, both past and present, if you were to march into someone else's country in the millions, the people of that country would shoot at you and call what you're doing an invasion. And they would be correct. It doesn't matter if you're armed, it doesn't matter how many of the locals you're killing on day-one. An invasion is what it is, and any sane person can see that.
Whether you do it openly or on the down-low by shooting the messenger: If you defend mass immigration, you will be remembered as an idiot who shot himself in the foot. Future generations will know that people like you existed and they will have many laughs at your expense.
Yeah, but you have to remember that at any other point in time if you were a faggot, a pedo or a tranny you would also be immediately killed or at the very least exiled from your community. This is now the norm in this country and you are the one who will be exiled if you try and do anything about it.
Morals and ethics are all upside down in this country, if anything the powers that be showed that people are dumb and will believe quite literally anything. Whatever happens to the American empire, if it will even exist in a few years, this is the one lesson nobody will ever forget: how simple it is to turn the entirety of a country into gullible nigger cattle in just a few generations.
 
That doesn't really matter, though. The US started a war of conquest against Mexico with the intention of expanding its territory, it knew Mexico didn't have the capability to hold or defend that territory effectively and went after it accordingly. Everything else was just window-dressing to justify the war and nobody really believed anything besides conquest was the rationale.
It doesn't matter that Mexico's ownership to that land doesn't extend past the map its printed on? The US invading for conquest doesn't change that was never really Mexico's land.
 
It doesn't matter that Mexico's ownership to that land doesn't extend past the map its printed on? The US invading for conquest doesn't change that was never really Mexico's land.
It only matters when you had a treaty establishing the border in effect already, like Mexico and the US had before the war. Even if you can't fully control the territory, if it's recognized internationally as part of your country and someone else takes it, that's a conquest.

Doesn't matter now though. The new treaty was signed recognizing the US territorial gains and both parties agreed to the new borders drawn as part of it. Plus, Mexico ended up selling the US another strip of Arizona a decade later so it further supports their mutual recognition of the new borders.
 
The US at this rate is eventually gonna have Spanish as a mandatory language. That said, if you think the competency crisis right now is bad, wait until the US goes full Mexico.

Rampant corruption and general incompetence will guarantee that technology will stagnate and collapse. We might even go back to using CRT monitors if it gets that bad.
 
It only matters when you had a treaty establishing the border in effect already, like Mexico and the US had before the war. Even if you can't fully control the territory, if it's recognized internationally as part of your country and someone else takes it, that's a conquest.

Doesn't matter now though. The new treaty was signed recognizing the US territorial gains and both parties agreed to the new borders drawn as part of it. Plus, Mexico ended up selling the US another strip of Arizona a decade later so it further supports their mutual recognition of the new borders.

And today's Mexicans aren't native to that territory anyway. The Mexicans who lived there became American citizens.
 
Back
Top Bottom