R
RK 672
Guest
kiwifarms.net
That was Max Bemis (of the band Say Anything) who wrote those pieces of shit. Aubrey Sitterson is behind those latest shitty GI Joe comics.
#Comicsgate - The Culture Wars Hit The Funny Books!
- Thread starter Done
- Start date
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
One Man Bland
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2017
These guys apparently.
Judging by their previous writing credits, I'm more curious as to who thought giving a show to the short bus writers who worked on that terrible Ultimate Spiderman cartoon. Tone deafness and terrible ham-fisted dialogue were just inevitable with those fuckers at the helm.
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2015
I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE!!! *
*unless it says there's only two genders as identified by your chromosomes, then it's wrong and problematic and every "old" way needs destroyed for being incompatible with my current sheltered worldview that I will break down over if challenged.
Good news, this mindset isn't sustainable, bad news, what will teach that unsustainability will be the destruction of long-standing institutions by people sure the last 50 - 100 - 500 years of work got it wrong because they didn't consider the gay dragonkins.
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2013
No, I was speaking in general about "I love Marvel....but we need to get rid of the Lee/Kirby creations. Not enough women/minorities/gay people". That doesn't compute to me unless you only care about logos since you're suggesting we need Marvel without Marvel.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Get woke, get broke.
Is it even possible to come up with a gayer name than "Aubrey Sitterson?" That name is gayer than a dozen Liberaces blowing thirteen Tom of Finlands.
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2018
I want to ask a very serious question.
Why?
Why do these people ignore basic economics, and antagonize their core fanbase and demographics, not just by infusing social justice propaganda into everything, but by insulting anyone who dares criticize them for it?
Why have these people not yet learned the lesson of "get woke, go broke", that has been shown in a great myriad of works and mediums these past few years, from the complete failure of Solo: A Star Wars Story, to the piss-poor performance of ALL-FEEMAIL Ocean's 8 remake/reboot/retardation?
Why is it that we have dumb cunts like Brie Larson making utterly retarded comments like this...
...and they get asspats from the comic journalists for it? Why is it that anyone criticizing them gets libeled and labelled as a living soup of bigotry by those same journalists? Do they not understand that this will only harden opposition to them?
So I say this: when you see a work, series, media franchise, or even medium being infected with SJW dogma, collectivist identity politics, and leftist ideology, you need to hit them where it truly hurts. You need to hit them in the wallet, by not paying for the SJW crap, by being selective in your purchases. Only then will they wake up and realize that they should focus on creating a good product or service rather than virtue signaling how woke they are.
Why?
Why do these people ignore basic economics, and antagonize their core fanbase and demographics, not just by infusing social justice propaganda into everything, but by insulting anyone who dares criticize them for it?
Why have these people not yet learned the lesson of "get woke, go broke", that has been shown in a great myriad of works and mediums these past few years, from the complete failure of Solo: A Star Wars Story, to the piss-poor performance of ALL-FEEMAIL Ocean's 8 remake/reboot/retardation?
Why is it that we have dumb cunts like Brie Larson making utterly retarded comments like this...
...and they get asspats from the comic journalists for it? Why is it that anyone criticizing them gets libeled and labelled as a living soup of bigotry by those same journalists? Do they not understand that this will only harden opposition to them?
So I say this: when you see a work, series, media franchise, or even medium being infected with SJW dogma, collectivist identity politics, and leftist ideology, you need to hit them where it truly hurts. You need to hit them in the wallet, by not paying for the SJW crap, by being selective in your purchases. Only then will they wake up and realize that they should focus on creating a good product or service rather than virtue signaling how woke they are.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2017
The Swoletariat is a Chikara wrestling gimmick waiting to happenHe says, as all openly right leaning comic pros are kicked/harassed out of the comics industry.
EDIT:
Joe ‘PewDiePie made fun of me in front of millions’ Glass is in:
View attachment 485431
Someone points out the obvious and Aubrey says libraries are selling comic trades,:View attachment 485432
View attachment 485433 View attachment 485434
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2017
Looks like shit is going down within the comicsgate community right now.
EVS and Doug Ernst are beefing about some bookdeal that went bad, and Captain Cummings are sperging out pretty hard as well. Can't really make sense of it yet.
EVS and Doug Ernst are beefing about some bookdeal that went bad, and Captain Cummings are sperging out pretty hard as well. Can't really make sense of it yet.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2013
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2015
The degree to which these hypocrites are blind is only really understood when you realize they think Peter Parker is a character nobody can relate to because yeah, he tries to juggle duty with personal life , but he's a straight white male, fuck him. That Tony Stark has problems with womanizing and the bottle, but those are white male problems, and he's rich, so fuck him. Bruce Banner endured childhood abuse and has a condition that means getting too stressed out means he may level half-a-city and everyone in it... but he's a white male in STEM where they're overrepresented anyway, so fuck him......
People liked these characters because they were already relatable to a LOT of people, despite it being literally IMPOSSIBLE for any of them to exist in the real world.... because exposure to radiation gives you cancer, not superpowers, and no matter how rich you were, and how many gizmos your cool power armor had, if you tried to be a hero in real life, it would be a matter of WHEN not IF that your enemies would find a way to get a loaded gun within ten feet of you the instant you stepped out of it to take a leak.... among other things.
"muh relatable!" is the WORST aspect to SJW writing, because it's irrelevant, but they treat it like DOGMA. They aren't even IN it for the fans, they're in it for their own egoes.
I've said it before and I"ll say it again, SJWs do not love the media forms they try and take over, they only love the notion of being it's GATEKEEPERS and kicking everyone they disapprove of OUT.
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2018
We're on year 3 of this, seems they would rather burn it down than relinquish it.
- Joined
- May 30, 2018
That's pretty much my creedo now. It's made my friends kinda bummed that I won't go see SW movies with them but I can't and I won't give Disney any more of my money.
On the plus side I've discovered my pirate roots. I don't need to give any company who has decided to snub core fans money when I have torrents.
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2018
Capn Cummings is sperging out about Ethan Van Sciver
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2018
New York Times and DC spoiled the Batman Wedding and people are pissed for multiple reasons. Some reasons include:
It Just Wasn’t Meant to Be, Batman
By George Gene Gustines
July 1, 2018
And here's the reaction to the articles:
The Internet Reacts to Batman Wedding Spoilers
By NICOLE DRUM - July 1, 2018
Readers Slam DC Comics, New York Times Over ‘Batman’ Wedding Spoilers
By CAMERON BONOMOLO - July 2, 2018
DC Explains Why They Spoiled Batman’s Wedding
By CAMERON BONOMOLO - July 1, 2018
Youtube Videos:
- They spoiled the ending a couple days before the book releases.
- The spoiler itself is causing people to spergout.
- The subversion of expectation.
- People are dropping Batman pre-orders and shops are pissed.
- People are assblasted that they spent money on the Prelude to the Wedding issue for a wedding that isn't happening.
It Just Wasn’t Meant to Be, Batman
By George Gene Gustines
July 1, 2018
Bruce Wayne and Selina Kyle at Wayne Manor as Alfred Pennyworth prepares breakfast for the couple, who first shared a drawn page in 1940. They were to marry July 4 in the latest issue of the Batman series, but stop the presses: Catwoman jilted Batman.CreditMikel Janin/DC Entertainment
Selina Kyle and Bruce Wayne, two of the most prominent citizens of Gotham City, were to be married at 6 a.m. on July 4. It was intended to be a quiet, intimate ceremony with just the judge and two witnesses atop the city’s Finger Tower skyscraper. It was a moment that has been building since the couple first met in 1940. It was also not meant to be.
The turn of events is revealed in issue No. 50 of Batman, written by Tom King and drawn by Mikel Janin with colors by June Chung and letters by Clayton Cowles, along with almost 30 other artists who capture a moment in the nearly 80-year history of the couple. The issue, published by DC Entertainment, is to go on sale at 12:01 a.m. July 4 at participating comic book stores.
Ms. Kyle and Mr. Wayne, or rather their famous costumed alter egos, met aboard a yacht as the Cat (as Catwoman was first known) planned a jewelry heist. The plot was thwarted by Batman, but the femme fatale may have stolen his heart. In the last panel of the story, Batman remarks to his sidekick, Robin, “Lovely girl. What eyes!” and adds, “Maybe I’ll bump into her again sometime.” (This encounter was published in 1940 in the first issue of the original Batman series. Thanks to the elixir-like properties of comic book aging and reboots, Batman and Catwoman can still pass for 30-somethings.)
Over the next 78 years, the two have met again and again: often as enemies, sometimes as allies, occasionally with revamped back stories, as comic books do. (In one version of their story, they aged normally, married — after Catwoman served prison time — and both died tragically. Their daughter, the Huntress, would carry on their legacy.) In June last year, their relationship reached a new level when the Bat, as she calls him, proposed to the Cat.
A page from DC Comics’s Batman, Issue No. 50 of the series.CreditMikel Janin/DC Entertainment
Another quandary came when Ms. Kyle found her dress. She broke into a bridal boutique in the dead of the night. After imbibing in some purloined Champagne, she helped herself to a $28,000 lavender and black lace gown (which was designed by the comic book artist Joëlle Jones; the groom’s gray three-piece suit was designed by Mr. Janin). She then sneaked back to stately Wayne Manor, where she spooned with an unknowing Mr. Wayne. This vandal and thief was the future wife of Batman?
Wayne Manor is the setting for many of issue No. 50’s emotional scenes, some of which are depicted in parallel as the couple ready themselves for their ceremony in separate wings of the estate.
Ms. Kyle is assisted for her dawn wedding by Holly Robinson, a friend and protégée who was introduced in 1987. Ms. Robinson noted to Ms. Kyle that she had never seen Mr. Wayne so happy. “He always seemed to need his misery” to serve his crusade, she said, as the two prepare to leave for the ceremony. The observation begins to stir some doubt in Ms. Kyle, who later asks her friend, “Am I a hero?”
Mr. Wayne has his own confidant, namely Alfred Pennyworth, his loyal butler for 75 years, who often wonders if his employer will survive his evening exploits. Mr. Wayne complains that his wedding suit is “too tight,” and Mr. Pennyworth is quick to jokingly scold: “Every night you wear a molded leather bat suit. You will be fine.” In another sequence, Mr. Wayne expresses his doubts to Mr. Pennyworth: “Can I be … happy?”
The answers to the questions are found in letters the couple have written to each other before their wedding day. Mr. Wayne’s correspondence reveals an acceptance of Ms. Kyle, who in her time has been a jewel thief, a villain, an antihero and a mob boss. “You’re not someone who can be figured out. Or solved. And never will be,” he declares. He also writes that he can be “more than a boy whose parents are dead,” that he can be “the man who loves you. Who will always try to love you better.”
Ms. Kyle’s letter lays out the truth as she sees it: “You’re still a child, Bruce. A hurt child.” Their happiness, she speculates, would kill Batman, who rescues everyone and turns pain into hope. “How can I do that,” she writes. “To save the world, heroes make sacrifices.”
In order to keep countless innocents safe, she concludes that she cannot marry Mr. Wayne. “My sacrifice is my life. It’s you.”
In the final moments of their story, the bride and groom end up at different locations in the early morning hours. In a silent page, Ms. Kyle sits on a rooftop, contemplating. She discards her veil and leaps toward the street. At the Finger Tower skyscraper, after an hour of waiting for his bride, Mr. Wayne realizes she is not coming. He throws off his tie and takes a similar leap, but in the opposite direction. Theirs is a story that is forever to be continued.
And here's the reaction to the articles:
The Internet Reacts to Batman Wedding Spoilers
By NICOLE DRUM - July 1, 2018
Batman fans have been eagerly awaiting Batman #50 as the milestone issue as it has been highly hyped as the wedding between Batman and Catwoman. However, DC Comics released major spoilers for the issue earlier today revealing exactly how the DC wedding of the year goes down and fans on the internet have a lot to say about it.
SPOILERS for Batman #50 beyond this point.
While Batman #50 hits store shelves on Wednesday, the spoilers released today reveals that the long-awaited wedding between Batman and Catwoman simply wasn't meant to be. Instead, Batman waits for his bride for an hour atop Finger Tower in Gotham before finally realizing she's not coming. It's a devastating story, made even more so by Catwoman's explanation to him.
In a note, Catwoman tells Bruce that she can't marry him because if he is happy -- and they would be happy married to one another -- Batman would cease to be. "How can I do that. To save the world, heroes make sacrifices. My sacrifice is my love. It's you," she writes.
The fact that the wedding doesn't happen isn't a huge shock to many fans. The idea that Batman needs his misery and can't continue to exist if Bruce Wayne is happy is a theme that Tom King has woven through the runup to Batman #50. Batman #49 drives the point home sharply with comments made by the Joker during a fight with Catwoman specifically, but even though many guessed the outcome of the wedding, having it spoiled for them several days ahead of getting to read it for themselves has had an impact. Some were upset that the story has been revealed, others declared that there was no longer a need to buy the issue, while still others are hoping that the spoilers are a red herring and that when the book arrives on shelves Wednesday it will have a different outcome -- something unlikely considering that a new Catwoman oncoing series from Batman artist Joelle Jones also goes on sale Wednesday alongside Batman #50
Want to see how the internet is reacting to the big Batman #50 spoilers? Read on from here and be sure to let us know your thoughts on the matter in our comment section below.
SLIDE 1 of 8 @MWDANVERS
"All these spoilers about Batman 50 it sounds like Stephanie Brown is marrying Batmanpic.twitter.com/1wDdkJFmQq"— on the mend (@MWDanvers) July 1, 2018
SLIDE 2 of 8 @FEISTYCOMICFAN
"So I’ve already had three people call to cancel their pre-order for Batman #50. I feel like@DCComics owes me money now.IV’E ALREADY PAID FOR THESE ISSUES. @TomKingTK, you really shot yourself in the foot dude.
Thanks @nytimes for costing me money."
— Feisty Fan (@FeistyComicFan) July 1, 2018
SLIDE 3 of 8 @NATEALLENSNYDE
"Whoever’s spoiling the new issue of Tom King’s Batman, can you please knock it off? I’d like to read the damn thing, not ruin it for me"— Nathan Snyder (@nateallensnyde) July 1, 2018
SLIDE 4 of 8 @WILSONMA02
"I'm really hoping that the New York Times article with the Batman 50 spoilers is just a marketing gimmick and that this isn't how the actual story goes down"— matt(@wilsonma02) July 1, 2018
SLIDE 5 of 8 @IAMTHELAW316
"I previously tweeted that I was going to save my money since I was so upset with the spoiler because... this was the wrong decision. But it's not my comic stores fault. So I'm going to buy an independent comic I wouldn't have in place of Batman 50."— It's Me (@IAmTheLaw316) July 1, 2018
SLIDE 6 of 8 @SHANIGRIM
"Ya'll I'm glad I read the Batman #50 spoilers because now I know not to throw money at a story that was hyped up based on a fucking lie. Saved me the money, sadly not the disappointment."— Shani Grim (@ShaniGrim) July 1, 2018
SLIDE 7 of 8 @SHANE_JC
"Just started reading the current Batman storyline aaaaaaaaand Batman #50 spoilers are outpic.twitter.com/nRvsoTdjVZ"— Shane Carroll (@Shane_JC) July 1, 2018
SLIDE 8 of 8 @ROUSEHOLD
"Really hoping these Batman 50 spoilers aren’t real pic.twitter.com/6TOySqjSjY"— Morgan (@rousehold) July 1, 2018
Readers Slam DC Comics, New York Times Over ‘Batman’ Wedding Spoilers
By CAMERON BONOMOLO - July 2, 2018
Batman readers are speaking out against DC Comics and The New York Times after the comic book publisher and the newspaper spoiled ‘Batrimony’ — the upcoming wedding of Bruce Wayne and Selina Kyle — ahead of Batman #50’s Wednesday, July 4 release date.
The months-long buildup to the extra-sized anniversary issue ended prematurely Sunday morning when The New York Timesspoiled the outcome in a piece titled — spoiler warning — ‘It Just Wasn’t Meant to Be, Batman.’
The paper detailed the upcoming issue, revealing Batman is left standing at the altar by his bride-to-be, the ever elusive Catwoman, who explains that marrying Bruce Wayne would make him happy — subsequently bringing about the end of his caped crusader.
“To save the world, heroes make sacrifices,” Selina tells Bruce in a letter. “My sacrifice is my life. It’s you.”
The move elicited mostly negative reactions from readers, including vitriol from comic book store owners left on the hook for cancelled pre-orders as result of the premature spoilers.
DC Comics Vice President of Sales John Cunningham offered an explanation for the Times story — DC Sales “strongly advocated” getting the news out ahead of the OSD, and the company wanted the outcome preemptively released before the book fell into the hands of “uncontrolled comic book outlets” — but it has done little to quell readers’ anger, much of which has been directed at both companies by outspoken and spurned Batman buyers on Twitter.
SLIDE 1 of 10 GOTCHA
"@DCComics dropped the ball. Hard. The issue is already spoiled, and it feels like the editorial chickened out and refused to the characters a chance to evolve and grow up. Shame."
— Tatoun (@KyleBarrech) July 1, 2018
"At least you’re owning it since it’s out there. So props I guess. It’s still bad business though to sell fans one thing for six months and then pull a “Gotcha” at the end."
— GD Batman (@ManicMattH) July 1, 2018
SLIDE 2 of 10EXPLETIVES
"I simply can not believe the boneheaded fucktard move @nytimes just pulled by spoiling Batman No. 50@georgegustines what the fuck is wrong with you, you dumb sack of shit?"
— ADAM FROM 2005 (@YesThisIsAdam) July 1, 2018
"@TomKingTK fu** there are already spoiler articles out on Batman #50 that's some BS. Thanks @nytimes dicks."
— PRIMO (@dx13primo) July 1, 2018
"You can’t even wait til the issue is released.. pic.twitter.com/ZEoBN1ZHNf"
— Matrix (@gzilladc) July 1, 2018
SLIDE 3 of 10 RIGHT OFF THE BAT
"Batman 50 spoilers right in the headline @nytimes ? I live for spoilers but a lot of people don't. Would it have hurt to bury this lede?"
— Maya (@mayak46) July 1, 2018
"SPOILERS
As disappointed as I am in the outcome of the wedding, that's not the big problem. How dare you,@nytimes. You didn't even give me a choice whether or not to know the big spoiler. You put it in the title! And now the issue is spoiled for me because of a notification."
— Gideon Imboden (@GideonImboden) July 1, 2018
SLIDE 4 of 10 MILKING IT
"So basically, you milked the hell out of this event, built it up for months, had multiple tie-in comics, and in the end, you didn't even go through with the wedding... pic.twitter.com/aqNUsaoNbu"
— PirateMonkE (@PirateMonkE13) July 1, 2018
"What happened to "The #Batrimony is real" 10,000 times from you guys in the last 6 months, hm? The #Rebirth promise is another bait and switch from the company who can't seem to do anything else."
— ᴀɴᴅ (@batcatnet) July 1, 2018
SLIDE 5 of 10 NO-SHOW, NO GROW
"Thanks for wasting my time @DCComics with the results of #Batman 50 and the @nytimes for spoiling it....also the tie-in books and false advertisement. Was really looking forward to the refreshing status-quo change, god forbid they actually let their characters grow"
— Drew Manson (@DrewManson91) July 2, 2018
"I’m actually considering dropping King’s Batman from my pull list due to the fact that we’re always promised these awesome and thrilling ideas, however they always come across as underwhelming and unable to live up to the hype imo"
— Charlie (@charliekoproski) July 2, 2018
"The @nytimes did everyone a favor here, IMO. @TomKingTK and @DCComics had a chance to take #Batman in a new direction, and show some real character growth. Instead they opted for a no risk/status quo option. Better to skip #Batman50 than to buy and be disappointed by a cop out."
— Adam Pavlacka (@gamescan) July 2, 2018
"Thank you DC and New York Times for letting up know that all this build up and anticipation didn’t amount to a DAMN thing and we wasted our time. “Going back to the norm b/c we didn’t have the balls to change things up w/ one of our flagship heroes for once”......smh. pic.twitter.com/opthLcvtJa"
— Nathan Lemuel (@LemuelNathan) July 2, 2018
SLIDE 6 of 10 CAT GOT YOUR TONGUE?
"Live update of @DCComics and @nytimes responding to their customers pic.twitter.com/WImJbgadvr"
— Twitt3rSoAngry (@RelaxTwitt3r) July 1, 2018
"pic.twitter.com/5ifAASBcv5"
— M.J. (@dogoodstuff1993) July 1, 2018
SLIDE 7 of 10 A DEATH IN THE PULL LIST
"Why would @DCComics let @nytimes spoil Batman #50? You guys just legit probably screwed over any store that has an exclusive cover.
I feel bad for @TomKingTK... I also will be dropping Batman from my pull.
Thanks for nothing."
— Erin (@AinoBeast) July 1, 2018
"I don't think the @nytimes realizes how much they just seriously hurt retailers in the comic book industry who have spent thousands of dollars on the 50th issue of Batman and have midnight release parties planned this week. @DCComics needs to stop giving advanced looks to them. pic.twitter.com/Afk454oEMS"
— Steve Ekstrom (@steve_ekstrom) July 1, 2018
"I'll still buy Batman #50 out so I don't screw over my comic shop, but after that, Batman is off my pull list."
— Gideon Imboden (@GideonImboden) July 1, 2018
"I have loyal Batman customers emailing me to take Batman off their pull. Thank you for this."
— RJ COMICS AND TOYS (@rjnieder77) July 1, 2018
SLIDE 8 of 10 DARK VICTORY
"Not only is this disgusting treatment of fans, but you just lost a ton of retailers a LOT of sales. Great job! Definitely lost my subscription too!"
— blüdhavenbabe (@bludhavenbabe) July 1, 2018
"For the love of God, whose bright idea was it to spoil the ending before the comic hits the shops??!! I won't buy issue #50 and I'm permanently removing Batman from my pull list."
— Anti-Sabotage (@IdentityAve) July 2, 2018
"Nope. Batman's off the pull list. A whole years worth of buildup was literally for nothing. X-Men Gold fooled me once, and this Batman 50 fooled me twice. Shame on me. What a waste."
— RogueTitan (@dehTeenTitan) July 2, 2018
"Why would you tweet this? You screwed retailers so hard by spoiling this issue. Bad editorial choice, bad marketing choice. I’ll pick it up bc I reserved a copy and I want to support my store, but nothing more going forward."
— Liz L. (@superliz6) July 1, 2018
SLIDE 9 of 10 HOLY LOST SALES, BATMAN
"While I think the decision to squander 50 issues of build up is bad enough, posting the spoiler before the issue is even out is by far worse. You guys just messed up badly and will cause comic shops to lose sales now. Great job DC ."
— Daniel S. Lopez (@DanielSLopez22) July 1, 2018
"Well DC you guys dropped the ball and expect a big drop in sales for Batman 51 and onward"
— George (@Hypnotique89) July 1, 2018
"For the first time since 2011, an ongoing Batman title is coming off my pull list. I've been thrilled with and have been following this story all along. I bought every tie in. And then you spoil the fact that you chicken out and screwed us out of a satisfying ending. Pathetic."
— Bradley Tabor (@nobodysside80) July 2, 2018
"i’ll be picking it up because i’m not gonna stiff my LCS. but after being lied to my face for months, batman will probably leave my pull list."
— annie (@korrakyle) July 1, 2018
"DC
What the fuck were you thinking spoiling Batman 50 like that
You just fucked over a ton of LCS, not to mention your writer"
— ToddHodd (@ToddHoddd) July 2, 2018
"If you're that compelled not to read it, don't do your local comic shop dirty like that by not going in Wednesday. Go pick up other titles, try something new. Don't let your LCS suffer. There's a lot of great titles out there. But honestly, give Batman 50 a chance first."
— Patrick "PJ" Campbell (@pj_campbell) July 2, 2018
"@DCComics I don't appreciate being faked out on the Batman / Catwoman marriage after investing a year into it. Not only that, you put my LCS in a bind promoting it.
If youre going to treat readers like that, I will not support your books anymore. You just lost a fan."
— The Doc (@Reverend_Syn) July 2, 2018
SLIDE 10 of 10 BATMAN AND ROBBIN'
"Weirdest part: it was unnecessary! Batman was getting married! You don't need to promote it by spoiling the rest of the story. It's maddening from a marketing standpoint. They robbed themselves of momentum AND likely made one of their top creators unhappy with them. Bizarre."
— David Harper (@slicedfriedgold) July 1, 2018
"I'm gonna stay away from what I read about Batman #50, but I do have to say:
Posting spoilers about it DAYS before it's been released after all the LCS have ordered it is not cool.
I can't help but think that the comic shops are going to be the ones who suffer from this."
— Captain Marvel Talk! (@CaptMarvelTalk) July 1, 2018
"So like I said, I'll buy Batman #50 because my LCS shouldn't be punished for what's been done. But I'm not buying Batman #51. I trusted this book to deliver something great, something inspiring, something with exciting possibilities. Unfortunately, that trust is broken now."
— Tally Dude (@TallyDude) July 1, 2018
"hey folks... if you pre-ordered Batman #50 and you're canceling out on picking it up at your shop -- please please please pick up something else instead. Try out a new title or two. Don't just leave your local shop high and dry. Lots of deserving comics out there."
— Peter Simeti (@petersimeti) July 2, 2018
"Just got this text from a friend and customer. This move by @DCComics @nytimes has hurt retailers HARD. I’m sorry @Joelle_Jones and @TomKingTK. This hurts and cuts so deep.pic.twitter.com/VW9rEYzyPQ"
— Feisty Fan (@FeistyComicFan) July 2, 2018
"5 cancellations on Batman #50. @DCComics you owe me $24.95."
— Feisty Fan (@FeistyComicFan) July 1, 2018
"Wow, what a wonderful and great way for you and the New York Times to spoil the plot for Batman 50. Now the ones that are going to suffer are the fans who've been spoiled and the comic shops who are facing order cancellations from their customers. Hope you're happy, DC.pic.twitter.com/NX2UX6PP0i"
— Jason Hintz (@mrgrimmace) July 2, 2018
DC Explains Why They Spoiled Batman’s Wedding
By CAMERON BONOMOLO - July 1, 2018
Youtube Videos:
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2016
Is anyone watch the giant comicsgate sperg stream that is going on right now?
I have no idea what the hell they're talking about.![:\](/styles/custom/emotes/svg/chris-confused.svg "Confused :\")
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghG7IYAVj10
I have no idea what the hell they're talking about.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghG7IYAVj10
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
If you're a sports dude, though, you can get away with any name. You can be named Dick Butkus. You can even be named Tyson Gay. You can even be actually gay.
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2018
Boy, he sure went full retard on this one.
"WHY DIDN'T EVS KEEP SJW'S OUT OF COMICS OVER THE LAST 25 YEARS, HUHHHHH?".
Oh I don't know, maybe it's because he was a fucking artist employee and not the head of HR at DC.
tl;dw:
"I'm not jealous"... "Seriously guys, I'm not jealous" ... "Not jealous at all"..
"FUCK IT, I'M JEALOUS!" *Autistic screeching*
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2017
I saw Cummings sperging coming from a mile away. Recently he’s been commenting passive aggressive stuff on Yellow Flash and YaBoiZack’s videos about how “I covered this already” and other things to that effect.
Here’s one on Zack’s Doctor Strange vid last week:
Both of them are pulling way bigger numbers than Cummings who is barely scratching 1,000 views per video.
It says a lot when a dozey guy like Yellow Flash has a more enticing personality than you.
Here’s one on Zack’s Doctor Strange vid last week:
Both of them are pulling way bigger numbers than Cummings who is barely scratching 1,000 views per video.
It says a lot when a dozey guy like Yellow Flash has a more enticing personality than you.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2018
Imo Captain Cummings has anger issues. This isn't even the first time he's done this. I can't recall when but he's done it before. Yellow Flash can be spergy too, but his videos are still better & he doesn't get as mad.
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2016
I can't even get through a Cummings vid tbh. Zack's just got this fatherly charm that makes it easier to listen to him ramble about comic books that the other guys just lack.