Disaster Coast Guard lieutenant arrested in terror plot - Race War now on hold

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Original story.
Secondary article.




WASHINGTON (AP) — A Coast Guard lieutenant who was arrested last week is a “domestic terrorist” who drafted an email discussing biological attacks and had what appeared to be a hit list that included prominent Democrats and media figures, prosecutors said in court papers.

Christopher Paul Hasson is due to appear Thursday in federal court in Maryland after his arrest on gun and drug offenses, but prosecutors say those charges are the “proverbial tip of the iceberg.”

“The defendant is a domestic terrorist, bent on committing acts dangerous to human life that are intended to affect governmental conduct,” prosecutors wrote in court papers .

Hasson, who works at the Coast Guard’s headquarters in Washington, has espoused extremist views for years, according to prosecutors. Court papers detail a June 2017 draft email in which Hasson wrote that he was “dreaming of a way to kill almost every last person on the earth,” and pondering how he might be able to acquire anthrax and toxins to create botulism or a deadly influenza.

In the same email, Hasson described an “interesting idea” that included “biological attacks followed by attack on food supply” as well as a bombing and sniper attacks, according to court documents filed by prosecutors.

In September 2017, Hasson sent himself a draft letter that he had written to a neo-Nazi leader and “identified himself as a White Nationalist for over 30 years and advocated for ‘focused violence’ in order to establish a white homeland,” prosecutors wrote.

Hasson routinely read portions of a manifesto written by Norwegian mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik that prosecutors said instructs would-be assailants to collect firearms, food, disguises and survival tools, court papers said. Breivik, a right-wing extremist, is serving a 21-year sentence for killing 77 people in a 2011 bomb-and-shooting rampage.

Hasson also expressed admiration for Russia. “Looking to Russia with hopeful eyes or any land that despises the west’s liberalism,” he wrote in the draft email. Prosecutors say during the past two years he had regularly searched online for pro-Russian as well as neo-Nazi literature.

Prosecutors allege that Hasson visited thousands of websites that sold guns and researched military tactical manuals on improvised munitions.

Federal agents found 15 firearms — including several rifles — and over 1,000 rounds of ammunition inside Hasson’s basement apartment in Silver Spring, Maryland. They also found a container with more than 30 bottles that were labeled as human growth hormone, court papers said.

Prosecutors wrote that Hasson “began the process of targeting specific victims,” including several prominent Democrats in Congress and 2020 presidential candidates. In February 2018, he searched the internet for the “most liberal senators,” as well as searching “do senators have ss (secret service) protection” and “are supreme court justices protected,” according to the court filing.

Hasson’s list of prominent Democrats included House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and presidential hopefuls Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand, Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker and Kamala Harris.

The list — created in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet — also included mentions of John Podesta, who was Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, along with Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Maxine Waters, former Rep. Beto O’Rourke, MSNBC’s Chris Hayes and Joe Scarborough and CNN’s Chris Cuomo and Van Jones, according to the court filing.

Hasson appeared to be a chronic user of the opioid painkiller Tramadol and had purchased a flask filled with four ounces of “synthetic urine” online, prosecutors said. Authorities suspect Hasson had purchased fake urine to use in case he was randomly selected for a drug test.

The chief at the federal defender’s office in Maryland — which is representing Hasson — declined to comment on the allegations. The Coast Guard did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Hasson’s arrest. No one answered the door Wednesday at the home address for Hasson listed in public records.

Hasson’s arrest on Feb. 15 was first noted by Seamus Hughes, the deputy director of the Program on Extremism at George Washington University.

___

Associated Press writer Michael Kunzelman in Silver Spring, Maryland, contributed to this report.

https://sneed.abcnews.com/images/US/Hassan-mugshot-01-ht-mz-190222_hpEmbed_1x1_992.jpg
Mugshot sourced from this article.
 
Gun tallying nomenclature, as used by gun owners, for the outsider:

1 gun: "A gun"
2-10 guns: "A couple guns"
11-20 guns: "A handful of guns"
21-30 guns: "A small collection"
31-50 guns: "A respectable collection"
51+ guns: "Do I have 'enough' guns? What is 'enough', anyways?"

Note that some gun owners may arbitrarily deflate the count in a variety of ways. For example, they may elect not to include any black-powder, muzzle loading weapons in this count. Others might track handguns and long arms separately.

For myself, I sometimes don't count all of my .22 rifles, because I got adopted by a mated pair of them back in the 90s and every time I go to count them I seem to have gained another one.

He had way to many guns for this plot..
 
He made an exel spreadsheet of traitors on the coast guard computer after googling "best place to see congresspeople in DC" at work too. This was January 19th, a month ago though. What prompted the arrest February 21st, a month later?

I can't wait for the full report.
The fact it took a month isn’t too surprising. They had to get a warrant, confirm the info on the computer was his, and probably also do other paperwork to get it done. Investigations take time, especially when you have mountains of data to sift through.
 
The fact it took a month isn’t too surprising. They had to get a warrant, confirm the info on the computer was his, and probably also do other paperwork to get it done.

With what the prosecution is alleging, it's not surprising that it took a month? They're alleging he planned to mass-murder the entire planet and the only thing that stopped him was the FBI reading his traitor excel sheet he wrote at work. He made a list on a government computer of traitors he allegedly wanted to kill. He's a member of the Coast Guard. He has much fewer rights, especially private rights, than a private citizen. He had a huge collection of over 20 guns and an astounding 1000 rounds of ammunition.

Don't you think if there was a real credible threat he was going to harm anyone on that list, they should have acted a little faster?

That's another point that makes me skeptical that this guy was a threat to anyone.
you're reading things into my post that I never meant to imply.

No, what you meant to imply is that I'm a tinfoil-hat REEEEtard for thinking the FBI allows crimes to happen when they get huge amounts of evidence to these crimes about to happen and they're on record as having reviewed this evidence and don't open formal investigations, but these people just "slip through the cracks" through normal human error.

Do you think the FBI is so incompetent that Hasan, Mateen, Farook and Malik, all Muslim extremists who committed mass murders in the USA, simply didn't think that these people were dangerous? This lieutenant who they waited months collecting info on and when his plans were as concrete as "yeah I'm gonna create a super-flu once I earn my microbiology-engineering degree inbetween popping pains pills" with his list of traitors in congress.

The DOD reviewed Hasan emailing extremist imams about suicide bombers and asking when it's ok to kill innocents in suicide attacks, but no investigation?

Why was this lieutenant the FBI's priority instead of these Muslim terrorists who were dangerous threats? Why wasn't Nick Cruz a priority to the FBI? These aren't "slips through the cracks" when 49 people were murdered by a person investigated by the FBI twice for terrorist threats and other red flags known to the FBI were never investigated until these people committed mass murders.

Why did the FBI execute a search warrant on Roger Stone with 29 agents, 9 vehicles, a helicopter, and a boat for lying to congress? Don't you think this doomsday Coast Guard prepper who had 20 guns and 1000 rounds of ammunition and plans to spread engineered super-diseases is a lot more dangerous than Roger Stone, a 66 year old political analyst with a medical marijuana card that disqualifies him from owning guns?

Why did I see the arrest of Roger Stone on the news for weeks? It turns out the FBI or someone informed CNN about the arrest warrant in advance, and the FBI was talking to CNN on the scene of this dangerous man's house that they need 9 land vehicles, 1 air vehicle, 1 water vehicle to arrest a political opponent and it's so dangerous that CNN can be 50 feet away filming.

Why didn't the FBI send 30 agents, a helicopter, a boat, and 9 cars to arrest this dangerous guy before he started his rampage of killing everyone in the world he planned back in January when he made a list of traitors in congress? The man with an arsenal, human growth hormone, and the intent to create biological mass weapons of destruction? Why didn't I see this guy's arrest on CNN on the headlines? Why did I see the siege at Stone's house and not this guy's house getting raided with HAZMAT-clad SWAT agents? Wasn't he a huge terror threat?

Stunts like that are why I think the FBI is not incompetent, they are a political arm of the government that will use huge amounts of resources pushing their political goals (30 agents, a helicopter, a boat, 9 vehicles to arrest a political opponent for lying to congress) and probably sent 1 or 2 FBI agents to pick this junkie up from his office job at the Coast Guard.

The FBI is so tied to "white-supremacist" organizations and entrapping people in them, lying about it, but instead you imply that the FBI's faults are only them "fucking up" and "slipping through the cracks." Was the Ruby Ridge siege another fuck up? Just the FBI trying to get another "white supremacist" involved in their plans, it goes wrong, the FBI lies about it and essentially orders him and his family killed because Randy Weaver did nothing wrong apart from refuse to be a pawn of the FBI. After corrupt judge after corrupt judge, justice does prevail against all odds, and the FBI demands that all of their agents are not punished for the murders of 2 people because the FBI does not need investigation, oversight, or any criticism.

Who was punished after Ruby Ridge? They investigated it, and then what? Oh, it was bad, we lied and entrapped and murdered this innocent man's family, but no one who was directly responsible should be punished. If the FBI's leaders push shit like Ruby Ridge, people in the FBI and new attorney general William Barr defends the actions taken at Ruby Ridge, and the FBI continues to act without oversight after no one was held accountable for the lies that lead to the murders of two innocent people, it's obvious the FBI as an institution has no respect for upholding the law. This pain pill eating Neo-Nazi who want to infect the food supply is the threat the FBI has to show for their hard work protecting this country.

If the FBI refuses to change its policy of proven failures, review why people are "slipping through the cracks" who shouldn't and fire investigators who fail to investigate, then I will continue to assert that the FBI is intentionally letting people die from terror attacks.
 
Last edited:
Stunts like that are why I think the FBI is not incompetent, they are a political arm of the government that will use huge amounts of resources pushing their political goals (30 agents, a helicopter, a boat, 9 vehicles to arrest a political opponent for lying to congress) and probably sent 1 or 2 FBI agents to pick this junkie up from his office job at the Coast Guard.

Why can't they be both? Government is incompetent at everything it does. Why would the FBI be any different?
 
With what the prosecution is alleging, it's not surprising that it took a month? They're alleging he planned to mass-murder the entire planet and the only thing that stopped him was the FBI reading his traitor excel sheet he wrote at work. He made a list on a government computer of traitors he allegedly wanted to kill. He's a member of the Coast Guard. He has much fewer rights, especially private rights, than a private citizen. He had a huge collection of over 20 guns and an astounding 1000 rounds of ammunition.

Don't you think if there was a real credible threat he was going to harm anyone on that list, they should have acted a little faster?

That's another point that makes me skeptical that this guy was a threat to anyone.


No, what you meant to imply is that I'm a tinfoil-hat REEEEtard for thinking the FBI allows crimes to happen when they get huge amounts of evidence to these crimes about to happen and they're on record as having reviewed this evidence and don't open formal investigations, but these people just "slip through the cracks" through normal human error.

Do you think the FBI is so incompetent that Hasan, Mateen, Farook and Malik, all Muslim extremists who committed mass murders in the USA, simply didn't think that these people were dangerous? This lieutenant who they waited months collecting info on and when his plans were as concrete as "yeah I'm gonna create a super-flu once I earn my microbiology-engineering degree inbetween popping pains pills" with his list of traitors in congress.

The DOD reviewed Hasan emailing extremist imams about suicide bombers and asking when it's ok to kill innocents in suicide attacks, but no investigation?

Why was this lieutenant the FBI's priority instead of these Muslim terrorists who were dangerous threats? Why wasn't Nick Cruz a priority to the FBI? These aren't "slips through the cracks" when 49 people were murdered by a person investigated by the FBI twice for terrorist threats and other red flags known to the FBI were never investigated until these people committed mass murders.

Why did the FBI execute a search warrant on Roger Stone with 29 agents, 9 vehicles, a helicopter, and a boat for lying to congress? Don't you think this doomsday Coast Guard prepper who had 20 guns and 1000 rounds of ammunition and plans to spread engineered super-diseases is a lot more dangerous than Roger Stone, a 66 year old political analyst with a medical marijuana card that disqualifies him from owning guns?

Why did I see the arrest of Roger Stone on the news for weeks? It turns out the FBI or someone informed CNN about the arrest warrant in advance, and the FBI was talking to CNN on the scene of this dangerous man's house that they need 9 land vehicles, 1 air vehicle, 1 water vehicle to arrest a political opponent and it's so dangerous that CNN can be 50 feet away filming.

Why didn't the FBI send 30 agents, a helicopter, a boat, and 9 cars to arrest this dangerous guy before he started his rampage of killing everyone in the world he planned back in January when he made a list of traitors in congress? The man with an arsenal, human growth hormone, and the intent to create biological mass weapons of destruction? Why didn't I see this guy's arrest on CNN on the headlines? Why did I see the siege at Stone's house and not this guy's house getting raided with HAZMAT-clad SWAT agents? Wasn't he a huge terror threat?

Stunts like that are why I think the FBI is not incompetent, they are a political arm of the government that will use huge amounts of resources pushing their political goals (30 agents, a helicopter, a boat, 9 vehicles to arrest a political opponent for lying to congress) and probably sent 1 or 2 FBI agents to pick this junkie up from his office job at the Coast Guard.

The FBI is so tied to "white-supremacist" organizations and entrapping people in them, lying about it, but instead you imply that the FBI's faults are only them "fucking up" and "slipping through the cracks." Was the Ruby Ridge siege another fuck up? Just the FBI trying to get another "white supremacist" involved in their plans, it goes wrong, the FBI lies about it and essentially orders him and his family killed because Randy Weaver did nothing wrong apart from refuse to be a pawn of the FBI. After corrupt judge after corrupt judge, justice does prevail against all odds, and the FBI demands that all of their agents are not punished for the murders of 2 people because the FBI does not need investigation, oversight, or any criticism.

Who was punished after Ruby Ridge? They investigated it, and then what? Oh, it was bad, we lied and entrapped and murdered this innocent man's family, but no one who was directly responsible should be punished. If the FBI's leaders push shit like Ruby Ridge, people in the FBI and new attorney general William Barr defends the actions taken at Ruby Ridge, and the FBI continues to act without oversight after no one was held accountable for the lies that lead to the murders of two innocent people, it's obvious the FBI as an institution has no respect for upholding the law. This pain pill eating Neo-Nazi who want to infect the food supply is the threat the FBI has to show for their hard work protecting this country.

If the FBI refuses to change its policy of proven failures, review why people are "slipping through the cracks" who shouldn't and fire investigators who fail to investigate, then I will continue to assert that the FBI is intentionally letting people die from terror attacks.
How-much-data-do-we-create-every-day.png

This is out of date by about a year, which means there’s even more data being made. To put this in perspective, the FBI has in total around 35,000 employees. About 1/3rd of that is likely to do with record keeping, legal casework, and your average administrative needs, then a chunk of what’s left is assigned to do data analysis and scattered all over the country. I’d estimate less than 300 of the FBI’s agents are dedicated data analysis. And then they have to sift through all of that data. Algorithms only go so far.

Then there’s the fact that you can’t arrest people for thought crimes. It’s totally fine to ask someone about suicide bombings, freedom of speech is a cornerstone of the US legal system.

Why does it take 30 agents to arrest and execute a search warrant on Stone? It’s the second bit, the search warrant. He’s got a lot more property to look through and has a higher risk of evidence destruction- which is extremely important in a counter espionage investigation. This guy had an apartment and they knew his daily schedule - they picked him up at work where he’d be far less likely to pull out a gun and shoot at the arresting agents. That’s standard procedure since Ruby Ridge. Heads rolled for that fuck up.

Another reason for the due dillegence and time they took is an incident around the early 80’s when the FBI and ATF arrested a bunch of white nationalists/neonazis and accused them of plotting terror attacks - most of them walked free, despite having links to actual acts of armed robbery. Why? Because the defense was able to argue they didn’t have any evidence besides circumstantial evidence for the majority of the arrested.

This guy had drug charges they could arrest him on while they build the case on the terrorism front beyond just “He said he might do this.”
 
Why does it take 30 agents to arrest and execute a search warrant on Stone? It’s the second bit, the search warrant. He’s got a lot more property to look through and has a higher risk of evidence destruction- which is extremely important in a counter espionage investigation

Yes, but what about the 9 vehicles, the helicopter, and the boat? Did those seem necessary just in case Roger Stone jumped on a boat or into a secret private helicopter and flew away to destroy evidence or does the FBI response seem a little overdone? If Stone really required all of these agents and land, air and sea vehicles to stop him from destroying documents? How could these be justified in any way to stop him from destroying evidence?
Then there’s the fact that you can’t arrest people for thought crimes. It’s totally fine to ask someone about suicide bombings

He wasn't asking about suicide bombings. He was sending messages glorifying a recent suicide bombing to a known extremist Imam. He was asking ethical questions about when it's ethical to kill innocent bystanders when suicide-vesting to commit Jihad. He was active duty in the US army, and they were aware of these messages but didn't open a formal investigation into him. They acknowledged these messages raised a red flag in their terrorism watch, but a formal investigation wasn't opened into Hasan, despite these flags being huge, especially for a person working for the US army.

I acknowledge that no agency is perfect and they can't prevent all crimes, but this guy showed up on their radar, it's logged that they noticed his online activity, and they did not look into him or at least just continue to survey him and maybe try to get a search warrant to spy on him. The people involved should be investigated and they should be fired if they were found to be incompetent. How can FBI agents feel proud when these tragedies could have been prevented if someone followed up on the lead that this active duty Muslim is speaking to radicalized Imams about a suicide bomber glorifying him and asking when it's morally alright to kill bystanders in jhad? These were brushed off as normal religious questions, when it's acceptable that innocents die in Jihad.

The department of Homeland Security warned in 2008 that he "targets US Muslims with radical online lectures encouraging terrorist attacks" but it's no problem that US military members are in contact with him.

This is what the FBI needs. Instead of doing anything like this, the FBI defends their agents, and says FBI agents who kill innocents in the line of duty can't be held criminally accountable, nor will they be really punished, but I guess we'll let one go if he kills the wrong person and the FBI has to pay (taxpayer) money in a lawsuit.

Nick Cruz's investigation or lack of investigations should also be looked into.

Heads rolled for that fuck up.

Whose heads? William Barr defended the sniper who killed Vicky Weaver pro-bono and he had no punishment, despite the Justice Department's investigation clearly saying he shot people who could not possibly be threats. 12 agents were "disciplined."

There weren't any criminal charges against anyone in the FBI.

Why can't they be both? Government is incompetent at everything it does. Why would the FBI be any different?

You will never disrupt my cognitive dissonance of the government being a malignant all-powerful all-knowing AI God giving specific instructions to every single government employee to harass specifically me and muh freedoms, and the government being so incompetent they couldn't finish a conversation.
 
Last edited:
the ssskealatin war was a cia false flag to disgrace true marine gamers. tell me, have you ever even seen an islamouse in real life?
 
Back
Top Bottom