Civvie 11 - Retro FPS Boomer

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
The funniest thing is the game was extremely critical of government over-reach, and the Division is depicted as causing far more problems than it solves. Gaming Journalists were unable to notice this without a Trump analogue, however.
 
I look like this and i say this. With straight face, mind you. The entire premise of boomer shooter(and nostalgia bait in general) just reeks of absolute failure of human being, whose only fond memories are those of digital media. That is besides occasional normgroids, that play them unironically. Also, both of boomershooter and postal 4 being literally plagued by "female men" just rhymes like poetry with whatever i dare to say. And whereas some of your words might be true and fair, do we really need to casually listen to "their" mantras on repeat and normalize the unapproachable status of grotesque critters? And besides, "media literacy" is quite literally political establishment of monopoly on interpretation.
This guy is a fag whose shit is all retarded but there really are way too many troons making doom mods and boomshoots.
 
First of all, is there a Ross' Game Dungeon Thread? There should be.

Second, what is this about Civvie11 twitter faggotry? I don't use that shit site would be nice to get actual receipts so people can point and laugh if true.

The talk about Ross' and The Division really reminded me of what a insane game that was and Ubisoft's amazing skill at taking decent ideas and absolutely destroying them. Ross' review was far more fascinating than the game and his attempts at trying to figure out what the fuck the game even is about without the supplementary material and instead treating it the way a good game should be treated showed how garbage it was.

Did we ever have explained what the fuck that game even was about outside of using Clancy's name like a crutch to sell a boring as fuck MMORPG that is only remembered now by the patented Ubisoft Graphical Downgrade and DSP getting caught jerking the gerking on camera before he began his "gameplay" stream of it? I get that they say some terrorists unleash smallpox on dollar bills on NYC during black friday or some shit but they never explain it further do they? Ross' point about a moment in the game where you come across some looters and they go "forget shit like jewelry and gold we are here for medicine" implies some real insane shit is going on and we never had it addressed.

Also, I don't think saying boomer shooters have a "troon investation" problem is quite right. Troons infect EVERYTHING. They are like locusts, wandering into fertile fields and taking it over with their narcissism and cult behavior. Any online community can be a target,
 
Pointing out Ubisoft made a game where you play as a fed who has a pass to murder hobos at a time where every company was kevetching about Trump is kinda valid

Especially since they released Watchdogs 2 with its quirky diverse cast in the same year

Its even funnier when barely 4 years later they released Far Cry 5 and got journos mad that people liked the rednecks and "keep your rifle by your side"


Ubisoft is that right kind of corpo retarded where they try to pander but some retarded european exec ends up shoving in shit that makes journos bitch about it, its great
I miss old based Ubisoft. I remember when they made a big hubub about adding an Anita Sarkessian analogue to Far Cry 4. She's "Amita Sarbeesian" and one of the two choices for who to lead the Golden Path.

Sounds cringe, right? It kinda is. But thing is? She's the fucking evil option. She advocates for getting child soldiers addicted to drugs so they're more loyal. She is full on the bad option and whoever wrote her into that story fucking knew it. Still puts a smile on my face.
 
Did we ever have explained what the fuck that game even was about outside of using Clancy's name like a crutch to sell a boring as fuck MMORPG that is only remembered now by the patented Ubisoft Graphical Downgrade and DSP getting caught jerking the gerking on camera before he began his "gameplay" stream of it? I get that they say some terrorists unleash smallpox on dollar bills on NYC during black friday or some shit but they never explain it further do they? Ross' point about a moment in the game where you come across some looters and they go "forget shit like jewelry and gold we are here for medicine" implies some real insane shit is going on and we never had it addressed.
Honestly, the games entire premise and setting is something I can see Tom Clancy writing in one of his books. A secret black ops agency that is activated when shit goes down on American soil? Thats half the books in the guys library. An they do explain stuff further down the line and it wasnt much a terrorist attack, but more a misantrophic scientist going "fuck humanity" and unleashing this virus he made. Now, I dont remember much of Rosses video, but I swear he mostly went through the starting area of the game.
 
It's so ABSOLUTELY over, Civvie is completely pozzed....

I can't wait for his next video though.
 
I miss old based Ubisoft. I remember when they made a big hubub about adding an Anita Sarkessian analogue to Far Cry 4. She's "Amita Sarbeesian" and one of the two choices for who to lead the Golden Path.
It was just "Amita", without a surname, and it was the result of wiki vandals. Probably a coincidence it sounded like Anita and they jumped from there.
 
So apperantly GManLives (who's somewhat Civvie adjacent, so I put it here) is now in hot waters for moral fagging on how shooting police in GTA is justified, but not civilians. I tried to find tweets on X, but getting them without an account seems to be impossible.
 
Blind Stalker 4

So apperantly GManLives (who's somewhat Civvie adjacent, so I put it here) is now in hot waters for moral fagging on how shooting police in GTA is justified, but not civilians. I tried to find tweets on X, but getting them without an account seems to be impossible.
Vid here:
 
So apperantly GManLives (who's somewhat Civvie adjacent, so I put it here) is now in hot waters for moral fagging on how shooting police in GTA is justified, but not civilians. I tried to find tweets on X, but getting them without an account seems to be impossible.
Of course ShillManLives would have such a braindead redditor take.

Why does anyone take him seriously again?
 
So apperantly GManLives (who's somewhat Civvie adjacent, so I put it here) is now in hot waters for moral fagging on how shooting police in GTA is justified, but not civilians. I tried to find tweets on X, but getting them without an account seems to be impossible.
He's hiding negative replies and trying to act like a smug cunt about it, apparently.

1699952924405.png

According to some people, he's also been blocking and unblocking people just to snark at them and deleting some of his bitchier replies to his detractors as well.
 
Here's a couple of the hidden replies from at least one person he's blocked and unblocked repeatedly.
1699953364722.png 1699953399094.png

Also seems like he deleted the original tweet that sparked a lot of this:
1699953523756.png 1699953582611.png 1699953606338.png 1699953638402.png
 
Back
Top Bottom