🐱 Chris Pratt Is Ruining Everything I Ever Loved

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
CatParty


I am now convinced that Chris Pratt is on a mission to destroy everything I’ve ever loved. Knowing my luck, he’s soon going to be cast in the live-action She-Ra adaptation alongside James Corden and Gina Carano, and when that happens I’ll have a justifiable reason to leave behind this mortal coil forever. He’s not quite the harbinger of the apocalypse, but he comes pretty damn close. Okay, maybe that’s a little much, but hear me out.

What I’m saying is that Pratt has become Hollywood’s generic leading man. He’s attractive, charismatic, and is now a household name that almost everyone I know is familiar with. Jurassic World and Guardians of the Galaxy saw to that, seeing the actor portray the same low-key misogynistic hero with a shit-eating grin who ends up saving the day and getting the girl. In Passengers, he wakes up Jennifer Lawrence from cryosleep on a ship serving as humanity’s last hope purely because he’s a bit horny. It’s gross, and I’m always baffled that the masses are so willfully charmed by his good looks and playful banter. However, I think the tide is beginning to turn.

It all started when Chris Pratt was cast as Mario in the upcoming animated film, a reveal that still feels like a fever dream. It’s so absurd, so outside the realm of possibility that it feels like Nintendo is pulling an elaborate prank to fuck us over. Jack Black as Bowser? Sick. Charlie Day as Luigi? Perfect. Anya-Taylor Joy as Peach? My boss has said this is awesome so I’m going to agree with her to avoid being sacked. But Pratt as Mario? The guy who attends a homophobic church and hunts animals because God told him to as everyone’s favourite plumber? Say it ain’t so.

Maybe it won’t be so bad. My prediction is that it will be just like the Jumanji reboot, with live-action stars being sucked into a video game where they inhabit the bodies of characters who no longer use their original voices. That or I’m just bargaining with the devil that this film won’t be the twisted nightmare we all know it’s going to be. Either way, Pratt is a criminally bad pick for Mario, and the other casting choices scream that this is a project hellbent on highlighting star power over voice acting talent. Some of them are excellent, but none feel necessary. Nobody is going to see a Mario film because Star-Lord is the guy donning the red and blue overalls. My mum might actually, but she doesn’t count.

The hell we inhabit only grew hotter earlier this week when Pratt was cast as Garfield. I thought this was a prank at first too, especially when it was announced on Monday. Chris Pratt abandoned a lifestyle of relaxation and societal norms to become a ripped Hollywood star, and that isn’t the kind of dude who should be playing Garfield - I bet he loves Mondays.

Much like Mario before it, this feels like a basic casting choice that fails to consider talent who might be better suited for the job. I’m not taking anything away from Pratt. He’s clearly an excellent actor with a catalogue of work to prove it, and I don’t know enough about the guy to label him as a bigoted homophobe purely because of his hobbies and the church he attends. That feels like jumping to conclusions, something that is done far too often nowadays. Don’t get me wrong, folks who show their entire asses online like Ronda Rousey and Gina Carano deserve everything that comes to them., Yeut they’re still hugely successful, so it feels like we’re barking up the incorrect tree at times like this.

This won’t be the last role Pratt is gifted that he is heinously unsuited for, because Hollywood has a habit of riding these trends until they inevitably end in disaster. I don’t see Chris Pratt pulling a Matthew McConaughey as he shifts into serious roles and scoops up an Academy Award. He’s charming and talented, but we’ve seldom seen this transfer into a film or television series that shows he can carry the emotional weight of an entire dramatic arc.

I still believe that if he hadn’t acted like a big baby throughout Infinity War that Thanos would have never succeeded in executing the snap. Star-Lord ruined everything, just like Chris Pratt is unknowingly poisoning the well of countless classics because he’s the big name that will draw in mainstream crowds. That’s good enough for the Hollywood machine I suppose, and there’s nothing we can do about it. So long, Gay Bowser, I’ll see you in conversion therapy.
 
A bit histrionic for a site called "thegamer", no?

Also, how did they avoid it?

1636643209345.png
 
Does the author or anyone for that matter really care about Garfield? I thought it was just a meme. No way this person was actually looking forward to a Mario movie by Illumination or another Garfield adaptation. They just wanted an excuse to make another Chris Pratt hit piece.
 
He’s not quite the harbinger of the apocalypse, but he comes pretty damn close
This is why you and your profession aren't taken seriously anymore. Even as a joke, you simply go too far, also you aren't funny.

In Passengers, he wakes up Jennifer Lawrence from cryosleep on a ship serving as humanity’s last hope purely because he’s a bit horny.
Credit where it's due, this was stupid. But not Pratts fault. I haven't heard that he is a Edward Norton tyoe that demands rewrites of scripts, he just acts and says what is written, as he is payed to do.

Jack Black as Bowser? Sick.
Jack Black as anything makes me sick.

As for the Mario movie, should have gone with voice actors. But big names put asses in seats I guess. Hopefully the age of the cinema is soon over, then we will see less of these castings when there is no need to sell tickets.


Probably.

Hopefully.

I'm just delusional, aren't I?
 
Actors aren't allowed to break out of typecasting, now? Jack Black's been perpetually typecast for the past two decades.
 
Chris Pratt unironically did nothing wrong. Seriously, none of his haters can point to a single concrete thing he's said or done as a reason to hate him. He's religious? So is most of America. He wrote an Instagram post that people think is sexist? It was about how much he loves his wife, for fuck's sake. If I were a more cynical person I'd almost think they're out for his blood for no other reason than he's a successful white heterosexual male...
 
I agree that he's not someone I would have cast as Garfield, but lol at the butthurt.

Also, I have to defend Passengers because this is something morons have said about the movie that is very incorrect: the movie tries to set a parallel of the Garden of Eden, where Pratt is Adam and Mystique is meant to be Eve. Pratt's character is supposed to be the Man Alone and how despite he has all commodities and entertainments available, he can't survive on his own because he needs company. And not any company, but female company. He could have woken up a buddy to have fun with, but he needed a woman to compliment him. "And the Lord God said, It is not good that the man should be alone", that's what they are going for: it's nothing but an ode to how much men need women and feminists, of course, missed the point.
 
"You're ruining everything I ever loved!" - Histrionic Woman Troon

"I don't even know who you are." - Chris Pratt, probably
 
Last edited:
Chris Pratt is getting miscast but he isn't the first actor to be and if I was him I would take the easy paycheck to voice Mario and Garfield, can't blame him at all. The blame lies on studios and those who have a say in casting. Jennifer Lawrence who is named dropped in the article was playing roles she was 10 to 15 years too young for and that casting did make for worse movies.

Also "Jack Black as Bowser? Sick. Charlie Day as Luigi? Perfect. Anya-Taylor Joy as Peach? " are also miscasts, I mean Anya-Taylor Joy looks like Peach but her voice is not stand out in any way. Seems like you just have a hate boner for the actor, because if you are talking about casting in that movie I would say Seth Rogen as DK is the worst one.

"Chris Pratt is unknowingly poisoning the well of countless classics because he’s the big name that will draw in mainstream crowds"
Sorry but the Mario and Garfield movies are very unlikely to be anything but cash grabs that use a well-known brand to make money. Stuff like the Lego Movie is very rare and you can see how rare it is by seeing the quality drop in the follow-ups. If Nintendo wanted the Mario move to be anything but a cash grab they wouldn't have got Illumination on board and the writer of Big Mommas: Like Father, Like Son. It not about making classics, it's about making lots of money quickly.
 
Faggots in dresses keep trying to get near children - primarily to rape them, but also to convert them - but yeah sure. The nominally normal guy is the problem. Fuck off and and neck thyself tranny.
 
Back
Top Bottom