War China no longer Pentagon's top security priority

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://archive.ph/doe0V/
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj9r8ezym3ro
1769241697784.png
China is no longer the top security priority for the US, according to the Pentagon's new National Defense Strategy.
The document, published once every four years, instead says that the security of the US homeland and Western Hemisphere is the department's chief concern, adding that Washington has long neglected the "concrete interests" of Americans.
The Pentagon also says it will offer "more limited" support to US allies.
It follows the publication last year of the US National Security Strategy, which said that Europe faced "civilizational collapse" and did not cast Russia as a threat to the US. At the time, Moscow said the document was "largely consistent" with its vision.
By comparison, the 2022 National Defense Strategy named the "multi-domain threat" posed by China as its top defence priority. In 2018, the document described "revisionist powers", such as China and Russia, as the "central challenge" to US security.
The 34-page document, released on Friday, largely reinforces policy positions staked out by the Trump administration over its first year back in office.
In that time, US President Donald Trump has seized Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, carried out strikes against alleged drug boats in the eastern Pacific and Caribbean, and more recently, applied pressure on US allies to acquire Greenland.
The strategy reiterated that the Pentagon "will guarantee US military and commercial access to key terrain, especially the Panama Canal, Gulf of America, and Greenland".
The document also says the Trump administration's approach will be "fundamentally different from the grandiose strategies of the past post–Cold War administrations".
It adds: "Out with utopian idealism; in with hardnosed realism."
Relations with China are to be approached through "strength, not confrontation". The goal "is not to dominate China; nor is it to strangle or humiliate them", the document says.
Unlike in previous versions of the strategy, Taiwan, the self-governing island claimed by China, is not mentioned. However, the document does write that the US aims to "prevent anyone, including China, from being able to dominate us or our allies".
Late last year, the US announced a vast arms sale to Taiwan worth $11bn (£8.2bn), leading China to hold military drills around the island in response.
The strategy also calls for greater "burden-sharing" from US allies, saying that partners have been "content" to let Washington "subsidize their defense".
Though, it denies this demonstrates a move towards "isolationism".
"To the contrary, it means a focused and genuinely strategic approach to the threats our nation faces," it says, adding that it does not want to conflate American interests "with those of the rest of the world – that a threat to a person halfway around the world is the same as to an American."
Instead, it says allies, especially Europe, "will take the lead against threats that are less severe for us but more so for them".
Russia, which launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine nearly four years ago, is described as a "persistent but manageable threat to NATO's eastern members".
The strategy also outlines a "more limited" role for US deterrence of North Korea. South Korea is "capable of taking primary responsibility" for the task, it adds.
In a speech made at the World Economic Forum earlier this week, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said the old world order is "not coming back" and urged fellow middle powers - like South Korea, Canada and Australia - to come together.
"Middle powers must act together because if we're not at the table, we're on the menu," Carney said at the Davos meeting.
That came as French President Emmanuel Macron also warned of a "shift towards a world without rules".
 
Real in this context means things that have a plausible chance of occurring. You can develop all sorts of zany fantasies but whats the point if a lottery ticket has better odds?

Hence why RAND, CSIS, ect have all put out papers that flat out say war over Taiwan is a fools errand and now the US needs to come to terms with China.
And all of those outcomes are real possibilities. A bunch of "think tanks" and "experts" spouting their "educated" positions is bullshit. Anyone who takes "experts" seriously is a fool. China is already mismanaged to hell and back. Is net importer of food, and has an economy predominately dependent on exporting. A naval blockade of China would cause mass unemployment, and starvation at the same time. Destroying three gorges damn would flood the lower Yangtze, killing millions, and ruining major transportation, and industrial centers. Not to mention any other major targets. Let's not forget the impeding population crises as well. Too few women ,who have all been brainwashed to avoid wanting children.

There is a reason Russia moved on Ukraine during Biden's term, and China didn't on Taiwan. Another decade of democrat rule and they might have, but that isn't likely to happen now. The death of the CCP is more likely today than at any other point in its history than say the Chinese civil war.
 
Presaged by the think tanks acknowledging that the US has no real win condition against China.
Imagine trusting a bunch of assholes jerking each other off over predictions and speculations that 90% fail to survive contact with reality.

Don’t forget to read your horoscope too!
 
And all of those outcomes are real possibilities. A bunch of "think tanks" and "experts" spouting their "educated" positions is bullshit. Anyone who takes "experts" seriously is a fool.
Unfortunately for you, your countries leadership listens to what these think tanks put out. and oftentimes they follow it wholesale.

You can huff and puff about how dumb they are but the people who rule over you don't care about what the people in the cheap seats think.
 
Likely due to troubling reports from the fleet stationed in heliocentric orbit around Gliese.
That would be bibliocentric orbit.

...

Anyway, China and Russia should be treated as rivals, because that's what they are. They can be made enemies, but it's unneccesary. Should they decide to freak out, we should be geographically prepared for it. What the zombie continent that lost the whole twentieth century and fucking killed itself thinks about our preparations is unimportant. Trump is unusually sane about this.

He's wrong about other things. Israel and Britain are enemies. We should sic the space niggers on them.
 
Kind of weird to develop killer viruses with your biggest enemy. And try to cover up their illegal biolab that was playing with about 2 dozen pathogens (including ebola) hidden in the downtown area of a US city (Reedley).

Also, I wonder why BBC changed the headline of this article.
 
Lol. Lmao even. Retards talking about think tanks and white papers while budgets and actions show that the United States considers Russia not worth worrying about, and China needing rapped on the knuckles globally
 
The document, published once every four years, instead says that the security of the US homeland and Western Hemisphere is the department's chief concern, adding that Washington has long neglected the "concrete interests" of Americans.
Right, sure. Call me when they have the southern border wall constructed and a full timed military guard there and maybe I will buy that. We'll kidnap Maduro because muh drugz but won't do anything about that Jewish demoness in Mexico despite almost all of the drugs funneling through Mexico. If I was to be generous, this actually means that America wants to secure more mineral wealth and maintain our Monroe Doctrine, not protect America.
 
Lol. Lmao even. Retards talking about think tanks and white papers while budgets and actions show that the United States considers Russia not worth worrying about, and China needing rapped on the knuckles globally
Has the US built any armored hangars along the first island chain?

I mean, they must have because they spend a bunch of money, right?
 
Has the US built any armored hangars along the first island chain?

I mean, they must have because they spend a bunch of money, right?
1769272371035.png
We've got 11 nuclear-powered armored hangars that can go anywhere in the world, over 40 nuclear-powered attack submarines that are so quiet not even our own allies can know where they are with any certainty, and long-range stealth bombers that only warn you of a strike when you hear the explosion. Oh, and you may have missed this but a head of state was just renditioned from his own palace by our special forces in a three hour special military operation.

So no, we don't have armored hangars sitting on island chains. Those are for losers worrying about what other people might do to them.
 
Has the US built any armored hangars along the first island chain?

I mean, they must have because they spend a bunch of money, right?
Go seethe sticker some more like you always do little wumao :story:

The first island chain is Japan-Taiwan-Flips, US doesn't base forces in Taiwan, it has numerous armored hangars in Japan, and yes construction is starting this year at several Flip bases after the agreement last year to bring our forces back to them. Construction has already been happening and is planned at dozens of airfields in the second island chain, like North Field on Tinian, where construction started in 2021. This construction is to provide additional airbases shoring up the air corridors the US would use to reinforce with planes from the continental US (southern corridor from Hawaii through Australia to second island chain and Flipland, central corridor through Hawaii also to Flipland and second island chain, and through Alaska to reach Japan, additional construction also happening to shore up that northern air corridor), and remove damaged planes from the theater for repair in a war. In addition to large munitions and supply dumps and radar arrays in Flipland and the second island chain. Thank you for your malding attention to this matter
 
Last edited:
Yeah, France falling to Islam would suck hard. Not so much the UK though since nobody's sure if their nukes even work, including His Majesty's Government.
The nukes definitely work, the missiles they're mounted on?

Aha haha, maybe? We can definitely blow ourselves up though so that's pretty funny.
 
The nukes definitely work, the missiles they're mounted on?

Aha haha, maybe? We can definitely blow ourselves up though so that's pretty funny.


Funny for everyone watching. Not for the guy who just lost his favorite foot.
 
Ork Mortar Crews.mp4
Funny for everyone watching. Not for the guy who just lost his favorite foot.
To be serious for a moment, the UK has needed to actually invest in a proper ICBM program for a while now. We have semi-private firms that have developed and continue to develop boosters capable of doing the actual legwork. We just have leaders that are completely nutless. There's no implementing the work we already have, it's just "Meh, America will sell them to us, so who cares?" It's such short term, retard thinking.
 
What would happen if they nuked Yellowstone? Or another inflection point in the US if any exist, truly don’t know.
Yellowstone, lol no. That's scifi shit. even if you had the Tsar Bomba, you'd basically just scratch the volcano. And even to really effect the volcano, you'd have to detonate the nuke underground. like 3 miles.

The CCP's plan is to disrupt power grids and internet access. maybe mass chaos in a few major cities. not nuke / bomb something like the hoover dam.

Edit: Humans have no ability to kickstart a volcano. You'd need something to melt through pure rock to unclog the magma chamber. Something that uses all the power consumption of earth at once. That tech is SciFi shit. Even if you lined up hundreds of tsar bombas underground at yellowstone, it wouldn't melt through the rock to the magma chamber. Bomb and nuke blasts are very instantious. They dont have the constant strength and power to melt rock.
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately for you, your countries leadership listens to what these think tanks put out. and oftentimes they follow it wholesale.

You can huff and puff about how dumb they are but the people who rule over you don't care about what the people in the cheap seats think.
You are by far the worse Rei kiwi on this website.
 
Unfortunately for you, your countries leadership listens to what these think tanks put out. and oftentimes they follow it wholesale.

You can huff and puff about how dumb they are but the people who rule over you don't care about what the people in the cheap seats think.
Donald Trump listens to the experts? The same ones who sad over and over again his policies won't work? Are you sure about that?
 
Back
Top Bottom