Disaster Children's commissioner: Pornography affecting 8-year-olds' behaviour - Weimar 2.0

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

The behaviour of children as young as eight is being affected by them viewing pornography, the children's commissioner for England has said.
"Children are seeing pornography too young - most of them by the age of 13 but [some are] seeing it at eight or nine," Dame Rachel De Souza said.
Most children first saw pornography on social media - and technology companies should do more to remove the images.
Schools needed to improve education and parents to set appropriate boundaries.
Dame Rachel has published a report on the influence of pornography on harmful sexual behaviour among children.
"At the most serious end", children were using the language of violent pornography and it was affecting their behaviour, she told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.


"Most children see porn first on Twitter - and then on Snapchat, as well as accessing the porn companies," Dame Rachel told Today.
"We need decent age verification, through the Online Safety Bill, but these tech companies could be stepping up now to get these images down."
"If you've got a social-media site that allows 13-pluses on, then they should not be able to see pornography on it."
Both Twitter and Snapchat have a 13-plus age limit.


A Snapchat official told BBC News: "Our community guidelines make it clear that we prohibit accounts that promote or distribute pornographic content.
"If we find this content, we remove it immediately.

"We also use machine learning to help us detect it and are working constantly to improve these capabilities."
Twitter has been approached for comment.
Its guidelines say: "You can't include graphic content or adult nudity and sexual behaviour within areas that are highly visible on Twitter, including in live video, profile, header, List banner images, or Community cover photos."
They also "restrict specific sensitive media, such as adult nudity and sexual behaviour, for viewers who are under 18 or viewers who do not include a birth date on their profile".


The government says the Online Safety Bill will allow regulator Ofcom to block access or fine companies that fail to take more responsibility for users' safety on their social-media platforms.
Dame Rachel said: "It's going through the Lords at the moment - we need it to go through, we need children not to be able to access porn, particularly this violent porn, online."

Men at Work founder Michael Conroy, who trains professionals working with boys and young men to have safer conversations among their peers, said: "In the past 12 months, I've worked with I think about 1,000 teachers, social workers and youth workers.
"And in each of training sessions I asked the question, 'Are the young people you work with impacted by porn?' The majority say, 'Yes, very clearly, definitely.'
"So there is there is an awareness of the issue - but perhaps not of the depth and scale of it.
"This is the first generation ever - it's like a gigantic historical experiment where we've given our children access to anything. But more importantly, perhaps, we've given anything access to our children."

-----------------------------------------------


horrify.jpg
 
It's a real problem, but their solution is retarded and had already been proven to be entirely unworkable. Parents should be taking responsibility for their children, rather than passing the blame over to the state and institutions.
 
This isn't even a new thing. I knew kids growing up that were exposed to porn around that age. One of them ended up doing meth (keep in mind this was about 20 years ago)

I have literally never heard of in my life. An 8 year old girl dropping panties in exchange for a lollipop or chocolate milk from another 8 year old in the schoolyard.
 
This isn't even a new thing. I knew kids growing up that were exposed to porn around that age. One of them ended up doing meth (keep in mind this was about 20 years ago)
The people who were bragging about accessing porn in my class in the 2000s ended up having problems with one trooning out. They had cable internet or a second dialup line and a personal computer in their early-mid teens.
 
It's a real problem, but their solution is retarded and had already been proven to be entirely unworkable. Parents should be taking responsibility for their children, rather than passing the blame over to the state and institutions.
It's justification for a retardedly draconic online safety bill that they'll expand. People have already floated the idea of banning VPNs because children can use them to bypass restrictions. That as a fringe benefit it makes monitoring everyone's online activity is totally not part of the reason. Honest.
 
It's a real problem, but their solution is retarded and had already been proven to be entirely unworkable. Parents should be taking responsibility for their children, rather than passing the blame over to the state and institutions.
  • It only takes one groomed child to corrupt a class (or other type of group)
  • Children who don't come into contact with others grow up fucked up
  • It isn't just about your own children (whom you may be able to reasonably control) but others', too -- they grow up fucked up and your country is done for
There should be severe penalties for institutions who give children access to porn at point of use. Specifically, parents and teachers under whose watch a child accesses porn should be treated as if they themselves dropped trousers (inb4 "bongland and pedos, name a more iconic duo"). Eight-year-olds can rape and murder each other with impunity; you will not be able to keep phones out of other children's hands, they will groom yours unless a governmental/institutional solution is in place to discourage it.
 
I've seen liberals say with a straight face that this means we need to have special pornography with good morals to show to kids.

Watch as we start hearing stories come out of these households once the kids are grown, and find out the moms have been showing their kids hardcore porn as "education" with dad's blessing. All the secrets eventually come out. The "comprehensive sex ed" these kids are getting in their liberal houses is getting more and more abusive.
 
Why bother with online censorship when kids can just go to their school library and read about dildos and butt sex? And if they're too young to read, there's always pictures.
But of course the only real porn is straight sex.
 
UK is starting to acknowledge inconvenient things for tptb as I stated in another thread: Something is up.
 
Back
Top Bottom