🐱 Chicago implementing vidya taxes

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
CatParty
https://www.bleedingcool.com/2018/1...chicago-will-be-taxed-extra-for-game-rentals/

Starting Wednesday, PlayStation owners in the city of Chicago will need to pay an extra 9% tax on some purchases due to the city’s Amusement Tax. A ruling back in 2015 by the city’s department of finance extended the Amusement Tax to cover streaming content as well as more traditional forms of entertainment. On Wednesday, Sony will begin complying with that ruling for PlayStation owners in Chicago.

Polygon reports:


The tax applies to things like rentals, not full sales of video games (where other sales taxes would still apply). Chicago, like many cities, has had an amusement tax for years, and last year moved to increase it (which the public detested) to help shore up a budget deficit.

A ruling in 2015 by the city’s department of finance extended the tax to charges for streaming content — including movies, music and games — paid by customers in the city. It has since been called the “cloud tax,” “Netflix tax,” and even the “Hamilton tax” after the blockbuster musical.

It’s important to note this is for rentals, not full sales, which would already be subject to local and state sales taxes that PlayStation began collecting back in 2016.

PlayStation users with a billing address in the city got a notice this week saying the tax would be applied toward transactions on all of the PlayStation Store’s streaming and rental offerings — PlayStation Plus, Now, Vue, Music, Video on Demand and Video Live Events.

The tax will only affect rental sales, as full game sales are already subject to local and state taxes thanks to a PlayStation Store update in 2016. The tax will affect all users with a billing address in the city of Chicago. The tax will be applied toward transactions on all of the PlayStation Store’s streaming and rental services including PlayStation Plus, PlayStation Now, Video on Demand, Video Live Events, Music, and even PlayStation Vue.

The tax is not without its opponents as Apple sued the city back in August, calling the tax unconstitutional. The Apple suit is still in arbitration.
 
At least with the soda tax someone could argue that it was taking a step towards either cutting down future health problems that could clog up public health care services even more by getting people to buy less, or if that fails at least pulls funds to from one of the major that contributers. (Especially in Chicago’s case where there’s a large black population that tends to be overepresented for contracting the diabetes) Whether or not that’s a good argument is up for debate, but the argument was there.

This tax however just seems like Chicago’s way of saying “We’re flat broke and have run out of reasonable things to tax so now we’re scraping the bottom of the barrel”
 
At least with the soda tax someone could argue that it was taking a step towards either cutting down future health problems that could clog up public health care services even more by getting people to buy less

You could if you weren't exceptional, Nah this is all about revenue generation. I'm sure the american people just love arbitrary tax hikes right?

 
Oh please; like anyone rents movies anymore. I could pull up at least three streaming sites in ten seconds.
 
Taxation is necessary. In order for the government to function they need funds to misappropriate and steal, otherwise what are they good for?
I need to give the government money so they can import endangered animals to fuck my wife for me because my strict soy diet has completely and utterly rendered my sperm impotent.
 
Oh please; like anyone rents movies anymore. I could pull up at least three streaming sites in ten seconds.
Even more, who rents games? Redbox is a joke and a rip off and Gamefly is...well, a joke and a rip off.

The people making this tax probably think Blockbuster and Hollywood Video are still around, and have no idea that the 2-3 'clerks' style video rentals that are actually still around are going to lose (what little) business.
 
This tax however just seems like Chicago’s way of saying “We’re flat broke and have run out of reasonable things to tax so now we’re scraping the bottom of the barrel”

Come back to me when they try to tax employers for literally employing people and then we can talk about "bottom of the barrel" tax proposals.

Seattle was a mistake guys, move to the peninsula or at least outside of King County. It's beyond saving.
 
The people making this tax probably think Blockbuster and Hollywood Video are still around, and have no idea that the 2-3 'clerks' style video rentals that are actually still around are going to lose (what little) business.

It wouldn't surprise me if more than a few haven't been to anything that wasn't their office or gated community in so long, they have no idea that video rental is extinct..... they'd think it was a joke or something. "What? But I swear I saw one, like the other day...... "
 
But, but, Bernie told me the Nordic social system would work! Why is all my money disappearing?

Jesus Christ, you fucking morons, not everything needs a fucking tax. Next thing you know, the "loicense" joke becomes a tax joke.
 
Just wait, soon they'll implement a sleeping tax and a breathing tax.

A fucking pleasure tax, Chicago never ceases to amaze me with how low it can go.
 
I dont understand how implementing a tax is going to stop "minorities" from stealing them. This seemly poorly thought out.
 
Back
Top Bottom