US Centrist Republicans warn against Trump's partisan shutdown strategy - Why would you fight back and be divisive MAGAts?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
WASHINGTON, Oct 4 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump'sfreezing of funds for Democratic-led states has raised concerns among some centrist Republicans in the U.S. Congress, who worry that leaning into these divisions could make it harder to end an ongoing government shutdown.
"You're going to create a bad faith environment here that could put us further out. They need to be very judicious," Republican Senator Thom Tillis, who is involved in informal bipartisan talks to end the shutdown, told reporters in the U.S. Capitol this week.

The government shutdown entered its fourth day on Saturday, making it the fifth longest in U.S. history.
Trump warned Democrats earlier in the week that he could make "irreversible" cuts to the federal government during a shutdown and the White House has so far frozen $28 billion in infrastructure funds that had been headed to New York, California and Illinois - all home to sizable Democratic populations and critics of the president.
Trump and his Republican allies have also taunted Democrats on social media with manipulated images of prominent lawmakers including House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries that drew on stereotyped images of Mexicans, despite the reality that Republicans will need the votes of at least seven Senate Democrats to pass a funding bill to reopen the government. Vice President JD Vance this week dismissed concerns about the images, calling them a joke.

A small band of Republicans warned that the Trump administration could end up bearing the brunt of the blame for the shutdown, heading into next year's midterm elections that will determine control of Congress.
Tillis, a North Carolina lawmaker who announced his retirement after clashing with Trump earlier this year, said he hoped the White House was coordinating its actions with Senate Majority Leader John Thune and House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson, who are trying to persuade their Democratic counterparts to support a short-term funding bill that would reopen federal agencies and fund government operations through November 21.

Others disagree with Tillis' concerns, including Johnson, who endorsed the president's approach.
“President Trump is just as anxious as we are to get the government back open, because real Americans are being harmed by the Democrat shenanigans. And is he trying to apply pressure to make that happen? He probably is, yeah. And I applaud that,” Johnson told reporters.

CONCERNS ABOUT CREDIBILITY OF COMPROMISES​

Senate Democrats, who are demanding a permanent extension of federal subsidies to help people afford healthcare insurance under the Affordable Care Act, have voted down the funding bill four times. Democrats also want protection against White House actions to withhold or cancel funding allocated by Congress.

"If OMB goes about canceling things, just like the rescissions that were foundational to past compromises, you destroy the credibility of future compromises," Tillis said, using the acronym for Vought's Office of Management and Budget. "Trust, that's how this place runs well, when it runs well."
The Senate left town after failing to pass a funding measure on Friday, setting the stage for the shutdown to last until at least Monday. There were no signs that Republicans and Democrats could reach a deal to reopen agencies anytime soon, raising the specter of a prolonged closure that could lead to an erosion of key government services including air traffic control.

"We're all Americans. We shouldn't be targeting different areas in ways that would be viewed as punitive. That's just not what we do," said Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, a Trump critic who the president tried to oust from office in the 2022 election.
"Let's not further divide people, politically. This is already stressful enough, and we just don't need to do that,” Murkowski added.
Democrats have been riled by Trump's use of the shutdown to single out his opponents for Amockery and insults.

“Obviously I don't agree with the insults. But there have been plenty of insults in both directions. Let's be fair," said Republican Senator Susan Collins, who said both sides need to stick with the facts and work to end the shutdown that becomes more harmful with each passing day.
“Does it help when the Democrats are ridiculing and insulting the president?” she asked.


L / A
 
A centrist republican is just a uni-party stooge. Only shitlibs care about the government being shutdown, and everyone is rightfully blaming democrats. Not Trump. Democrats need to suck it up, and accept they are out of power. Its Trump's time to run things.
 
Centrist Republicans are as useless as a marzipan dildo, to crib a line from The Thick of It. You could eat a marzipan dildo, at least (and look pretty gay doing it), but "centrist" RINO cucks should be primaried the fuck out.
 
Last edited:
Can someone answer this for me? What’s the point of reconciliation needing only a simple majority if the government can be shut down without a 60 vote majority? It seems illogical, and either the CRs should be simple majority or the reconciliation should be 60 vote majority. Otherwise this is going to keep happening endlessly unless a party holds 60+ seats.
 
"If OMB goes about canceling things, just like the rescissions that were foundational to past compromises, you destroy the credibility of future compromises," Tillis said, using the acronym for Vought's Office of Management and Budget. "Trust, that's how this place runs well, when it runs well."
broooooo Donald you are being so mean dude... how are we ever gonna compromise on all our positions now? this place only runs well when we give the democrats everything they want... c'mon... cuck out, just for us? smooth things over
 
Can someone answer this for me? What’s the point of reconciliation needing only a simple majority if the government can be shut down without a 60 vote majority? It seems illogical, and either the CRs should be simple majority or the reconciliation should be 60 vote majority. Otherwise this is going to keep happening endlessly unless a party holds 60+ seats.

Reconciliation is a cosmic joke by Kafka. Anything that absolutely HAS TO be done only needs a basic majority via reconciliation because by the point everyone wants the thing done and don't want to go through the song and dance of needing a super majority to block the filibuster. EVERYONE knows it's a cosmic joke but no one cares to change it because reconciliation is the only thing they can arse to deal with how gridlock shit it.
 
Back
Top Bottom