US CDC issues new eviction moratorium - CDC declares itself to be above the SCOTUS

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Article
Archive


CDC issues new eviction moratorium​


The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is issuing a new, "temporary" moratorium on evictions, the agency announced Tuesday. The new moratorium, which CBS News confirmed earlier Tuesday would be announced, will be separate from the CDC's prior eviction moratorium that expired over the weekend.

The new order, which expires on October 3, covers counties experiencing "substantial" or "high" levels of COVID-19 spread. One source familiar with the moratorium said that currently includes about 80% of U.S. counties, or 90% of the U.S. population.

"The emergence of the delta variant has led to a rapid acceleration of community transmission in the United States, putting more Americans at increased risk, especially if they are unvaccinated," CDC Director Rochelle Walensky said Tuesday. "This moratorium is the right thing to do to keep people in their homes and out of congregate settings where COVID-19 spreads."

The latest moratorium order could face legal challenges, after the Supreme Court determined the Biden administration couldn't extend the previous moratorium eviction through executive action. As the latest eviction moratorium was about to end last week, the White House told Congress to act, while Congress called on the White House to act. The White House said it lacked the authority to extend the moratorium.

In June, the Supreme Court decided in a 5-4 decision to allow the eviction ban to continue through the end of July. One of the justices voting in the majority, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, made clear that he would block any additional extensions unless there was "clear and specific congressional authorization."

President Biden told reporters Tuesday afternoon he isn't sure whether the new eviction moratorium will pass constitutional muster, but any litigation would "probably give some additional time" for rental assistance funds to flow.

"Any call for a moratorium based on the Supreme Court's recent decision is likely to face obstacles. I've indicated to the CDC I'd like to look at other alternatives," the president told reporters Tuesday.

Meanwhile, public health officials raised concerns that allowing evictions to resume while the coronavirus is surging again could lead more people to get sick and die unnecessarily.

Representative Cori Bush has slept outside the Capitol to protest the end of the eviction moratorium, and call for action. She tweeted Tuesday afternoon that "our movement moved mountains."

"On Friday night, I came to the Capitol with my chair," Bush tweeted. "I refused to accept that Congress could leave for vacation while 11 million people faced eviction. For 5 days, we've been out here, demanding that our government acts to save lives. Today, our movement moved mountains."
 
The local talk radio station was interviewing a bunch of smaller landlords this morning over the new moratorium.

Every. single. one. said they will never rent to retail or unskilled labor again. Too much of a risk when the next pandemic hits.

That's going to have some nasty long term consequences when the lower end of society just can't find housing even if they barely make enough money. These new moratoriums are literally hurting people they're meant to protect.

:stress:

I wouldn’t rent to them either, but they were always more of a risk tenant wise. Like it or not poor people are more likely to trash units and stop paying.

I can’t imagine how much this is hurting them and I doubt they’ll be quick to forget it.

I’m sure tenants are happy, but foresight is in incredibly short supply these days.
 
tbf that's basically all government
Yeah but they don't even have guns. There isn't even a pretense of enforcement, just "the power of MUH CONSTITUSHUN compels you!"
This is why everything is fucked; the law is irrelevant if you have enough power. They run Congress and the Army and the media will cover for them until the end of time; the law is a suggestion.
I mean, that's kind of the historical norm. The problem (well, part of the problem) is the hyperreality that's been built out of the skinsuit of the old Constitutional order. We have these elaborate procedures and rituals to determine outcomes and they don't... actually do anything. It's all for show; policy is set by NGOs, judges, and bureaucrats, elected officials are all but powerless, and elections are "fortified" to make sure nothing interferes with any of the above.
 
That's extremely interesting. I wonder if in the future you'll have to pay rent in advance rather than in arrears.

"Sure thing single mother struggling to find somewhere to live we can rent you a place to live, we just need the $30,000 upfront and you're all set"
Easy. Just pass a law making it illegal to require more than one month upfront. Hell, make it illegal to require anything upfront, including security deposit.
 
Nothing. They’ll do nothing. Guaranteed.
SCOTUS will do nothing because they CANT'T do anything. The executive branch has all the guns, and the legislative controls the budget. The elephant in the room is that SCOTUS is just a bunch of assholes in stupid clothes. Andrew Jackson told the supreme court to eat a dick when they sided with the natives in Worcester v. Georgia iirc, and nothing happened. Lincoln and FDR did the same thing. They have no real power.

The only reason the other branches pretend they do is because if the masses realize you can just ignore 1/3 of the government, what about the other two-thirds?
 
SCOTUS will do nothing because they CANT'T do anything. The executive branch has all the guns, and the legislative controls the budget. The elephant in the room is that SCOTUS is just a bunch of assholes in stupid clothes. Andrew Jackson told the supreme court to eat a dick when they sided with the natives in Worcester v. Georgia iirc, and nothing happened. Lincoln and FDR did the same thing. They have no real power.

The only reason the other branches pretend they do is because if the masses realize you can just ignore 1/3 of the government, what about the other two-thirds?
So what you're saying is, we need to establish a Hall of Justice with armed Judges to patrol MegaCity-1 Washington DC?
 
Don't landlords just have to get a lawsuit in front of one conservative judge to get a nationwide injunction, though?
 
Don't landlords just have to get a lawsuit in front of one conservative judge to get a nationwide injunction, though?
Nope. Each US region has a circuit federal court. A favorable ruling only applies to those regional boundaries. What the landlords are hoping for is an injunction, to basically stop the CDC program. Chances are for a judicial circuit split elevating it to SCOTUS but the law will expire before the reconvene.
 
Nope. Each US region has a circuit federal court. A favorable ruling only applies to those regional boundaries. What the landlords are hoping for is an injunction, to basically stop the CDC program. Chances are for a judicial circuit split elevating it to SCOTUS but the law will expire before the reconvene.
Yeah, that's what I meant, given how quick Trump's travel bans were slapped down that way, I would think some smart lawyer could angle the case in the right direction to the right circuit to get a likely injunction. But I guess it doesn't matter if the SCOTUS would find it moot whenever it gets up to them.

I also kind of thought SCOTUS could have emergency sessions if they wanted, but I'm just thinking wishfully.
 
The Biden Regime and CDC have now directly asserted that they have more authority than SCOTUS.

They do not.

The question now is what will SCOTUS do.
Like what'll happen with that guido, Cuomo molestins the women; bupkis , zilch, nada. Politicians aren't held to the same standard as us regular jackoffs.
All SCOTUS will do is bitch unless they're Democrat activist like RBG
 
Back
Top Bottom