🐱 CDC Goes All In on Woke Speech

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
CatParty



The CDC is the supposed gold standard when it comes to science and public health. But what are we to make of the agency’s going all in on woke terminology in the name of promoting “health equity”? From its newly issued, “Health Equity Guiding Principles for Inclusive Communication”:

To build a healthier America for all, we must confront the systems and policies that have resulted in the generational injustice that has given rise to health inequities. We at CDC want to lead in this effort—both in the work we do on behalf of the nation’s health and the work we do internally as an organization.
Achieving health equity requires focused and ongoing societal efforts to address historical and contemporary injustices; overcome economic, social, and other obstacles to health and healthcare; and eliminate preventable health disparities.
CDC’s Health Equity Guiding Principles for Inclusive Communication emphasize the importance of addressing all people inclusively and respectfully. These principles are intended to help public health professionals, particularly health communicators, within and outside of CDC ensure their communication products and strategies adapt to the specific cultural, linguistic, environmental, and historical situation of each population or audience of focus.
The idea is to prevent stigma:

Language in communication products should reflect and speak to the needs of people in the audience of focus. The following provides some preferred terms for select population groups; the terms to try to use represent an ongoing shift toward non-stigmatizing language.
I’m all for respectful communication, but come on! The worry about stigma can actually keep people from self-destructive actions. But never mind. People must be made to feel comfortable even in their most dysfunctional (can I say that?) circumstances. Thus, when it comes to abusing drugs:

Instead of this . . .
  • Drug-users/addicts/drug abusers
  • Alcoholics/abusers
  • Persons taking/prescribed medication assisted treatment (MAT)
  • Persons who relapsed
  • Smokers
Try this . . .
  • Persons who use drugs/people who inject drugs
  • Persons with substance use disorder
  • Persons with alcohol use disorder
  • Persons in recovery from substance use/alcohol disorder
  • Persons taking/prescribed medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD)
  • Persons who returned to use
  • People who smoke
“People who smoke”?

Instead of the word, “homeless,” the CDC wants us to use the term, “Persons experiencing unstable housing/housing insecurity/persons who are not securely housed.” Instead of “poor,” say, “People with self-reported income in the lowest income bracket (if income brackets are defined).” Instead of “illegal immigrants,” instead use the term, “People with undocumented status.” What word salads!

And then there are the LGBTQ etc. issues. Instead of “gay” or “biologically male or female,” say:

I can’t keep up. Read the whole thing. It is a wonder to behold.

This exercise in verbal correctness will do more harm than good. Rather than improve communication with most Americans, the CDC will instead undermine its remaining credibility with the half of the country that is not on the port side of politics, and indeed, could well turn off many of the very people the agency claims to be trying to reach — for example, those whom they are trying to vaccinate.

And the CDC wonders why so many Americans have turned their backs on “the experts.”
 
God forbid they can tackle actual health problems instead of producing the lowest effort fake-feel-good write up. I'm sure people going through actual issues (homelessness, drug abuse) don't give a single flying fuck about what some bozo on the internet refers to them as.

Imagine at your place of employment you spewed ineffective nonsense to make yourself look and feel good instead of doing your actual job.
 
I saw the YouGov poll results on this yesterday, and not even the left agrees with this change. Only 18% said they supported changing to this way of speaking. When even the leftist don't like it, you know you've got a problem.
 
So, instead of using a single concise world they want to replace it all with a long string of words.

So, they'll remove the word, and in that way, remove your ability to actually be able to understand the concept.
 
Pushing increasingly obtuse terminology onto people is just a way for bureaucrats who spend all their time obsessing over this shit to attack or otherwise discount any opinion expressed by someone too busy with real world shit to keep up with the latest jargon.

And taking terms like "homeless" that have a negative connotation and trying to replace it with "our unhoused neighbors" or other such shit doesn't suddenly remove the negative connotation, people whose heads aren't firmly up their rectums just use the term with ever more sarcastic tones.
 
I saw the YouGov poll results on this yesterday, and not even the left agrees with this change. Only 18% said they supported changing to this way of speaking. When even the leftist don't like it, you know you've got a problem.
It doesn't matter what anyone actually wants. Enough bureaucrats at the CDC have converted to the critical theory dogma that the agency's policy will be the dogma, or else. Once someone is a part of the dogma they must worship the dogma with every word they speak, and they must pressure everyone around them to speak the same way. Anything less would be blasphemy.
 
If you want people to change for the better, you hold them accountable even if it makes them feel uncomfortable. If you don't give a shit if they die off, you beat around the bush and use pansy-ass terminology to avoid hurting their feelings. Not everyone held accountable will try to change for the better, but it yields better results than letting people run themselves into the ground with their addictions. This should be common knowledge, yet here we are.

This article is just another reason to disregard what the CDC says, or at least hold what they say with a grain of salt. It's clear they're all about keeping up appearances and give zero fucks about genuinely helping people (which doesn't look well when they're trying to push beta-phase vaccinations!)
 
Persons experiencing unstable housing/housing insecurity/persons who are not securely housed
Houselessness, the true and honest term CDC, is Houselessness.

A fat potato with a fakegina and lots of mall ninja shit in Portland was already on this shit, like 5 years ago, you fascist pigs.
 
Sounds like the Center for Disease Control needs to be controlled for disease. I just can't Trust the Experts as long as they believe the Science that women have penises and men give birth.
 
I saw the YouGov poll results on this yesterday, and not even the left agrees with this change. Only 18% said they supported changing to this way of speaking. When even the leftist don't like it, you know you've got a problem.

18% is enough to force this garbage through, if they are a stubborn enough intransigent minority.

Taleb says it only takes 3-4% of a population. Studies that try to replicate this effect put the number around 20-25%, with the effect showing up as low as 10%. It seems to hinge on how little a change affects what people do. If it's a small change that doesn't matter, like changing terminology, it is more likely to be pushed into effect by an even smaller minority. In fact coming up with names is often the exact issue used in the experiments.

It probably only took 2 rabid advocates in the CDC, plus a single permissive boss, to get this recommendation pushed through.
 
Instead of this:
  • Bringing politics into an organization that should be concerned with as close to an impartial bias as possible on health concerns
  • Lying to the public repeatedly about a new virus
  • Labeling things that are very much outside the purview of a "Center for Disease Control"'s mission a "health crisis"
  • Operating with authority that your organization doesn't have
You instead try this:
  • Fucking off and doing your actual fucking jobs
  • Shut the fuck up if what you have to say isn't confirmed
  • Stop acting as a political body when you're supposed to be an impartial observer and warning/information organization
  • Quit acting as if your organization has any enforceable authority over the American citizenry whatsoever
  • Cease with the attitude of an organization that's infallible and trustworthy when you've been proven to be politically motivated liars
I think the CDC will find this list both comprehensive, and helpful to their actual purposes as an organization, immensely so, in fact.
 
Back
Top Bottom