- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
No fucking clue for the fuel pump or fuel filter, oil filter wasn't long agoI bet it's your fuel pump and/or clogged filter. What's the history on those two item's last change?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No fucking clue for the fuel pump or fuel filter, oil filter wasn't long agoI bet it's your fuel pump and/or clogged filter. What's the history on those two item's last change?
Fuel pumps going out on cars that are in the 20 year range is pretty common and could very well be the source of crank but no start since the crank position sensor was already replaced. That's my wager.No fucking clue for the fuel pump or fuel filter, oil filter wasn't long ago
I'll clarify, to my knowledge, they messed with the sensor. And it was working so they gave it back. Could be eitherFuel pumps going out on cars that are in the 20 year range is pretty common and could very well be the source of crank but no start since the crank position sensor was already replaced. That's my wager.
For some reason I couldn't reply to your original reply to me, but I honestly can't quite make heads or tails with what you've told me. Nothing wrong with how you explained it, just my brain being dumb.Ok 1 more question. Got a chem test to check for exhaust in coolant. Instructions say to test at radiator neck with radiator cap off and 2 to 3 inches of air space in order to suck up the air. My vehicle's radiator cap is along a horizontal hose, and I dont think its possible to stick the tester in with any air space. If I siphon off some coolant it will just fill right back up as it circulates. I have an expansion tank/reservior where hot coolant gets dumped. The test should be accurate there too, right? As long as everything is to temp and circulated well?
If the expansion tank is fed by a hose that isn't coming from the cap itself (an unpressurized tank) it could wind up with some exhaust gasses in it eventually, but if it isn't a high point in the system, it may never see them. The cap in the radiator hose will be a high point in the system so it should be possible to get some air space below it without any harm, just not a lot. Just watch the temp gauge.Ok 1 more question. Got a chem test to check for exhaust in coolant. Instructions say to test at radiator neck with radiator cap off and 2 to 3 inches of air space in order to suck up the air. My vehicle's radiator cap is along a horizontal hose, and I dont think its possible to stick the tester in with any air space. If I siphon off some coolant it will just fill right back up as it circulates. I have an expansion tank/reservior where hot coolant gets dumped. The test should be accurate there too, right? As long as everything is to temp and circulated well?
Gonna look into getting an e55 amg.
I would love the wagon e55 but those are super rare and expensive. The only person I know that has one is a YouTuber named LegitStreetCars. Except his has a big whipple superchargerAwesome. If it weren't for the computerized bullshit, cramped engine bays and SBC you have to deal with on those they'd be on my list for a daily driver candidate. They aren't even expensive, unlike a CTS-V, but that's for a reason I guess. Gotta love supercharger whine and a fast luxury car. Today's twin turbo luxury cars have even more torque and power, but they sound like crap in comparison and look like crap too.
The Ford Maverick no longer comes with a standard hybrid powertrain. Ford announced Wednesday that the 2.0-liter EcoBoost will replace it as the base engine for 2024, with the hybrid now commanding a $1500 premium, according to Ford Authority.
That's a big loss on paper, though in the real world, you were unlikely to find a base Maverick hybrid without at least $1500 of markup anyway. The move to make the hybrid an extra-cost option should help with the supply issue, as demand for the 40-mpg-plus compact pickup has been stronger than Ford expected. Realistically, it also helps capture some of the added markup that dealers have been applying and putting it in the Blue Oval account.
As Ford confirmed to The Drive, the Maverick's base price of $24,995 with destination charges remains. That'll just be a 2.0-liter turbo model. If you want the 2.5-liter hybrid, you'll have to spend at least $26,495. If you want to order a 2023 Maverick, that's too bad, as the pickup is sold out for this model year. We expect orders for the 2024 Maverick to open shortly. Act fast when they do, because last time they sold out quickly.
Extremely fucking sad. I've been thinking on one in the future. Sigh. Wanted one either in yellow or that area 51 sand blue.Well it seems good things don't last. For all the Ford Maverick lovers, Ford is increasing the price of the little truck and changing the lineup hierarchy. The hybrid is no longer the cheapest option and is getting a price increase for 2024. No longer is the little Maverick's entry price under 25000 USD and the hybrid will start at 26000+ USD. Though it's not like it matters as dealers marked them up anyway. Now they'll be marked up even more with the higher msrp.
It's probably a blessing in disguise to keep your trusty xg350.Extremely fucking sad. I've been thinking on one in the future. Sigh. Wanted one either in yellow or that area 51 sand blue.
On the plus side, my XG350 should start getting repaired today! I'll call on wendsday for a update, but I'm excited. Finally, I will have my luxury beater back baby!
Probably so. Speaking of... it's back baby! It was the crankshaft sensor. They replaced another one since they were in there, but only charged me for one, because I stood my ground at the start I think. Thing is quiet as a mouse now, runs lovely, and oh the SPEED. That 3.5 liter after over a week of my brother being on vacation and loaning me his Civic, reminds me why I love 6 cylinder engines, so smooth and powerful. I just have to get back used to the gas bill lol. I'll be investing in a ob2 scanner now that I have your guys suggestionsIt's probably a blessing in disguise to keep your trusty xg350.
Probably so. Speaking of... it's back baby! It was the crankshaft sensor. They replaced another one since they were in there, but only charged me for one, because I stood my ground at the start I think. Thing is quiet as a mouse now, runs lovely, and oh the SPEED. That 3.5 liter after over a week of my brother being on vacation and loaning me his Civic, reminds me why I love 6 cylinder engines, so smooth and powerful. I just have to get back used to the gas bill lol. I'll be investing in a ob2 scanner now that I have your guys suggestions
@Doggo idk I just saw your reply, and now I cant reply, ha. My vehicle is a 2000 Dodge 4.7l, not known for gasket issues. New radiator cap was put on a couple weeks ago.
Actually I have done the block leak test several times now and finally got a faint positive yesterday at the cap and the expansion tank....BUT after freaking out about the issue all day and reading up, I think I contaminated the test fluid tube via testing that it works properly by sucking up exhaust straight from the tail pipe and not rinsing it well enough, letting some carbon deposits stay. I found out by testing the air in my livingroom with the same faint positive results, ha. I even called around to see if a mechanic would do a gasket sealer application for me if I brought him the bottle before realizing. Didnt do it yet and now I think it might not be the head gasket. No more coolant cap streaks, but air keeps getting in the system. I think it was air in the system that caused the coolant to leak from the cap the 1st time, it ran a bit hot in stopped highway traffic in 110 degree heat.... I have burped the radiator a few times now and small amounts of bubbles come out. Takes like a week but more air gets in there from somewhere. I hear it in the dash when it starts seeping in. didnt realize thats what that noise was... No coolant loss, I have no idea what is up. Repeating block leak tests again today with a much better understanding of how the test actually works and a fresh un contaminated tube. If THAT is positive then its still head gasket related, but I actually think it may come out fine. Idk.
Actually just had one of four of my brake bulbs burn out yesterday lol. Yes there's two per light fixture, very redundant because old luxury car. Glad you got yours replaced!I had a brake bulb replaced in my car today.
Glad you explained why that was happening. Its working well now, though i wont say its fixed because thats just bad luck, and ive payed for it.Good stuff! A bad crankshaft position sensor will definitely cause a crank no start, because the computer needs to know where the engine is in its rotation in order to fire the spark plugs at the right time. If it doesn't get a signal from the sensor, it won't fire the spark plugs and thus won't start.
Never heard of a Navara, must be a Euro thing. Yeah, I like V6's. They're gas hogs, but they feel smooth as fuck on the ride and can pull hard. My car can tug 1000 pounds, I can get a tiny camper if I really wanted lol.I'm borrowing a car at the moment as mine is having issues when towing a trailer, and I'm about to tow a trailer for a 2,000km round trip starting early in the week, and I already miss the 3.8L boat anchor of a Buick 3800 in my car. It's not overly powerful but it does have a whole load of torque. Maybe even more than the car I'm borrowing, which is a 2.5L turbo diesel with a 5 speed auto box. It's a Nissan Navara which I don't think the US got. It's probably what you'd call a midsize pickup truck, but it's just a ute to me. In any case, I miss the smooth power of my boat anchor V6.
Never heard of a Navara, must be a Euro thing. Yeah, I like V6's. They're gas hogs, but they feel smooth as fuck on the ride and can pull hard. My car can tug 1000 pounds, I can get a tiny camper if I really wanted lol.