Cancel Mel Gibson - Why is Hollywood still hiring this raging anti-Semite?

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Every day, as dawn’s rosy fingers reach through my window, I arise and check in with Twitter, to see what fresh hell awaits. Generally, by about 6:30, I’ve been made furious by the outrage du jour. But recently, I experienced more of a sense of bemusement than ire, as I took in Deadline’s headline: “Mel Gibson in Talks to Direct Lethal Weapon 5.”

Gibson is a well-known Jew-hater (anti-Semite is too mild). His prejudices are well documented. So my question is, what does a guy have to do these days to get put on Hollywood’s no-fly list? I’m a character actor. I tend to take the jobs that come my way. But—and this hurts to write—you couldn’t pay me enough to work with Mel Gibson.

Now, I love the Lethal Weapon movies (at least the first few). And Danny Glover’s a gem. But Gibson? Yes, he’s a talented man. Many horrible people produce wonderful art. Put me down as an ardent fan of Roald Dahl, Pablo Picasso, and Edith Wharton; can’t get enough of what they’re selling. But these three had the good taste to die. That makes it a lot easier to enjoy their output. Gibson lives. And Tinseltown need not employ him further.

If Gibson is welcomed back to direct the latest installment of this beloved franchise, it may be time to stop publishing think pieces about the power of “cancel culture.” Because if he can continue to find big bucks and approbation in Hollywood, cancel culture simply does not exist.

Gibson’s political beliefs are—as my father would say—somewhere to the right of Ramses (check out YouTube to see Gibson saluting Donald Trump at a UFC fight). He has said sexist things and yelled racist slurs, and that should have been enough for liberal Hollywood to cut him off. But his reported anti-Semitism has been more consistent, more open, and more egregious.

The fact that this doesn’t seem to bother Warner Bros. executives makes me wonder if, to them, “Jews don’t count”—as the comic David Baddiel posits in his book of the same name. Baddiel, a British Jew, argues that “polite” society treats anti-Semitism as a semi-acceptable form of prejudice. And most maddening and confusing is that the anti-racist, progressive left often seems to tolerate and, at times, produce it. It breaks my heart to ponder how many Jews must have been part of the process that led to Warner Bros.’ announcement.

This might feel like a smaller matter if it didn’t come at a moment when members of my tribe feel the walls closing in again. Jews were the victims in more than 50 percent of religious-based hate crimes last year. In recent years, we’ve witnessed the Tree of Life massacre in Pittsburgh, the murder at the Chabad of Poway synagogue in California, Jewish students harassed on college campuses, European anti-Semitism on the rise—these are the headlines that make us feel unsafe. Is this really the time to glorify a man like Mel Gibson?

Yes, he has denied some of the stories of his anti-Semitism, like the time Winona Ryder said he asked her if she was an “oven dodger” at a party. Color me unconvinced. This is the man who directed and co-wrote The Passion of the Christ, a film that, in addition to earning Rotten Tomatoes’ highest audience score for a film in Aramaic (as of this writing), is also a gleeful attack on my people, portraying Jews as eager Christ-killers, a libel that has been used as an excuse to torment and murder Jews for two millennia.

Don’t agree with my take on the film? Okay, let’s look at Gibson’s arrest record.

In 2006, a fershnikit Gibson was pulled over on Malibu’s Pacific Coast Highway and detained for drunk driving. In the back of the police car, Gibson reportedly went on an anti-Semitic tirade, prompted by his (correct) suspicion that his arresting officer was Jewish. “Fucking Jews,” Gibson said. “The Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world.” Gibson later claimed that, under the influence of alcohol, he had said things he didn’t actually believe, but, seriously, in vino veritas—I myself once stood up at Nobu after a bit too much sake and announced, “I wish I were taller!”

If the police report doesn’t move you, let’s go to the tape.

In 2010, recordings of voicemails and phone calls between Gibson and his then-girlfriend (and mother of his child) Oksana Grigorieva were publicly released. I recognize that my argument that anti-Semitism is somehow singularly excusable is undermined by what these recordings show, which is that in addition to being a rabid anti-Semite, Gibson also has deep malice toward women and people of color in his heart. Lowlights include Gibson’s telling Grigorieva, “If you get raped by a pack of niggers, it’ll be your fault” and “Shut the fuck up! You should just fucking smile, and blow me! ’Cause I deserve it!”

You get the idea. Let me remind you also that Gibson pleaded “no contest” to a charge of domestic battery against Grigorieva in 2011.

How can Warner Bros. (a company founded by Jews) possibly consider hiring this man again? On its parent company’s website I found a very laudable “inclusion” policy. It reads, in part, “WarnerMedia is committed to diversity, equity and inclusion, as moral and business imperatives. It is essential that our workforce, content and creative partners reflect the diversity of our society and the world around us.”

Beautiful. Really. But may I humbly suggest that in addition to a robust inclusion policy, Warner Bros. needs an equally robust exclusion policy? How about “Don’t hire racist, anti-Semitic misogynists”? Free advice: Avoid this trifecta, Warner Bros. You want a triple threat? Don’t hire Mel Gibson; search for the next Donald O’Connor!

And it’s not just Warner Bros. that’s wearing moral blinders. Earlier this year it was announced that Gibson will star in a John Wick origin series for Starz and Lionsgate Television. How did this guy become such a hot ticket again? Is it just that memories of his hate speech have faded, while Hollywood’s recollection of his box-office pull remains?

It is inarguably true that the main targets of Gibson’s prejudice are the Jews, but what boggles my mind is that Hollywood is also overlooking his profound misogyny and forays into anti-Black racism. I wish anti-Jewish hatred alone were enough to get him cast into the wilderness, but, hey, if it has to be because of his other prejudices, I’m okay with that. Let him take the hundreds of millions he’s already earned in Hollywood and retire somewhere nice to contemplate his life choices. I hear the Judean Hills are lovely this time of year.

I write this knowing that it’s more likely to lead to a boycott by Warner Bros. of Joshua Malina than of Mel Gibson. But if that’s the result, so be it. I’ve had a nice career, baruch Hashem. It would be great if higher-profile executives, producers, and actors would also take a stand. Then I could believe in this cancel culture I keep reading so much about. And I could also believe that Jews do, in fact, count.

Joshua Malina is an actor known for his roles on Sports Night, The West Wing, Scandal, and The Big Bang Theory. He was executive producer of Bravo’s Celebrity Poker Showdown, and is a co-host, with Rabbi Shira Stutman, of PRX’s upcoming podcast Chutzpod!
 
Gibson is a good actor and a great director. The fact Jodie Foster is an out (but classy) lesbian and is close friends with him tells me he's a good guy with a terrible alcohol problem. And that's good enough for me, a rando stranger who doesn't know him personally.

Also, he upsets limp-wristed weirdos in the industry so you know he's based.
 
How old is the little shit that wrote this? He might be too young to remember that Mel was canceled hard after the drunken anti-Jew rant. He was actually one of the first celebrities I can think of that was canceled in a modern sense.

The fact is, it was like 15 years ago, and Mel is an undeniably talented guy. He will, on occasion, find work.
 
Last edited:
Having nuanced characters is something that terrifies them. Can't have any evil POCs. If I was a hollwood niggo, I would be begging Mel to make a period piece set in ancient Africa. It would be badass, and give Mel an army of Black Israelites to defend him against the (((white people))) of Hollywood.

Imagine the butthurt if Mel did a film on the fall of Ethiopia to communists.
 
lol get fucked. After hollywood has been protecting polanski for eons, after they all said they knew weinstein was a sex pest abusing actors, yet did nothing, hollywood has literally no moral high ground on anyone. they should all be cancelled.
 
Mel Gibson is clearly more anti-English than he is anti-Jewish. Ever seen Braveheart or The Patriot? I guess the difference is that Anglos don't endlessly kvetch whenever they feel slighted.
 
Mel just seems like a typical Aussie as far as I can tell.
Drunk, violent, and constantly swearing at everyone and everything? More like your typical mick though, given he's named after Saints Mel and Columcille of Ireland and was born in New York as the sixth of 11 children.
Early Life Section said:
Gibson was born in Peekskill, New York of Irish descent, the sixth of eleven children, and the second son of Hutton Gibson, a writer, and Irish-born Anne Patricia (née Reilly, died 1990). Gibson's paternal grandmother was opera contralto Eva Mylott (1875–1920), who was born in Australia, to Irish parents, while his paternal grandfather, John Hutton Gibson, was a millionaire tobacco businessman from the American South. One of Gibson's younger brothers, Donal, is also an actor. Gibson stated his first name is derived from St Mel's Cathedral, the fifth-century Irish saint, and founder of Gibson's mother's local native diocese, Ardagh. His second name, Colmcille, is also shared by an Irish saint, and is the name of the Aughnacliffe parish in County Longford where Gibson's mother was born and raised. Because of his mother, Gibson retains dual Irish and American citizenship. Gibson is also an Australian permanent resident.
 
Keep in mind, the only film he directed that had Hollywood Studio Backing was Braveheart (produced with The Ladd Company, founded by the executive at 20th Century Fox who Greenlit Alien and Star Wars and saved the company from bankruptcy)
Everything else he directed, the studios only distributed it and had no hands involvement and his production company, Icon Productions, financed them all. (Man without a Face with Warner; Just mentioned Brave Heart;Passion wasnt even distributed by a mainstream company, at the time the distributor, Newmarket Films, had like three successful films, Memento by Christopher Nolan, Monster (Patty Jenkins) and Donnie Darko which only just got a cult following when Passion was released; Apocalypto was goddamn Disney via Touchstone Pictures; Hacksaw was mostly some indian company, the Australian government, and Lionsgate)

On top of that, his production company also distributes films in Australia and even briefly did so in the UK.
So even if he was canceled, he'll still make and distribute whatever the hell he wants. You can't Quell the Mel.
 
lol get fucked. After hollywood has been protecting polanski for eons, after they all said they knew weinstein was a sex pest abusing actors, yet did nothing, hollywood has literally no moral high ground on anyone. they should all be cancelled.
I could imagine a meme showing a guy sleeping.
"Roman Polanski agressed sexually a teenager", guy sleeps.
"Harvey Weinstein agressed sexually lots of women, guy sleeps.
"Mel Gibson rants about Jews, guy open his eyes wide!

And then these SOBs will protect Alec Baldwin....
 
I'm lost. What did Picasso and Wharton do that was bad?
Picasso was a hardline misogynist according to some of the women who dated him, he wanted them for sex and to make him dinner but couldn't stand them otherwise. But he was also a communist who won numerous awards from the Soviets, which would be enough to outweigh that in the mind of Hollywood kikes usually.

The worst thing Wharton did was cheat on and later divorce her medically ailing husband, but I'm guessing that's not the problem this jew has with her, but rather the fact that she was a loud and proud supporter of French imperialism.
 
Low tier Jew: REEEE WHY HASN'T MEL GISON BEEN CANCELED YET??!!
The Jews that run Hollywood: Speak up!! We can't hear you over the fat stacks of cash that keep pouring in from his last film!

I don't know why this needs to be explained to anyone working in the industry.
 
In fairness though, Mel goes back and forth between wanting to be trad and wanting to be back in Hollywood. Mostly now he seems to want back into making regular Hollywood films. If the Passion was his declaration of being a trad catholic, then Apocalypto was a partial apology to the natives where the main character benefits from ancestral protection and chooses to avoid the Spanish when they arrive. Personally, I think he's got some serious BPD which in turn feeds the chemical dependency. I'd prefer he stick to one thing and not try to have two feet in opposing camps. Mel, if you want back in to Hollywood, don't even bother going back to the religious stuff. One takes away from the other.
 
Donnie Darko has had a cult following since its release, nothing to do with Passion.
Not immediately, cult followings grow over time, which is why I said around passions release is when it had a notable cult following (especially since the Director's Cut was released that year).
 
Back
Top Bottom