Disaster Canada May Start Euthanizing Babies - How else will they get a higher Indian population?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Canada May Start Euthanizing Babies​

LifeNews (A)
By Steven Ertelt
2026-02-09 14:28 EST

Canada’s medical assistance in dying program, (MAID) already one of the world’s most permissive euthanasia regimes, may soon extend to disabled newborns.

That possibility is reigniting horror among pro-life advocates who warn of a slippery slope toward eugenics.

The Quebec College of Physicians recently told the British newspaper Daily Mail that it believes “medical assistance in dying may be an appropriate treatment for babies suffering from extreme pain” and that “parents should have the opportunity to obtain this care for their infant,” according to an article by Anna Farrow published in the Western Standard.

The statement revives a debate that first erupted in 2022 when Louis Roy of the Quebec College of Physicians appeared before Parliament’s Special Joint Committee on Medical Assistance in Dying. Roy suggested the program could be considered for “babies from birth to one year of age” who are born with severe deformities or disabilities, Farrow reported.


Public backlash was swift.


On CBC Radio, Liberal Disabilities Minister Carla Qualtrough responded, “There is no world where I would accept that,” Farrow wrote.


Pro-life groups assumed the idea was shelved, but international media coverage in September brought it back into focus. A feature in The Atlantic headlined “Canada is Killing Itself” compared Roy’s proposal to Nazi Germany policies, sparking outrage from euthanasia supporters.


“Most Canadians disagree strongly with the concept of euthanasia for babies,” Farrow wrote. “We know this because every time the topic comes up, the public’s response is one of instant horror. So why does it keep coming up?”


Canada’s euthanasia law, legalized in 2016, has seen rapid expansion.


In 2024 alone, there were 16,499 reported euthanasia deaths, bringing the total to 76,475 by year’s end, according to government data cited by Alex Schadenberg, executive director of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition. By early 2026, Schadenberg estimated at least 94,000 deaths since legalization.

Quebec College of Physicians said:
“...parents should have the opportunity to obtain this care for their infant...”
What care? They're killing the baby and that's considered care?
 
I would not necessarily be against something like this if there was a very narrow definition of what “severely disabled” means. There are, unfortunately, cases where an infant is born alive in only the most technical sense of the word. I wouldn’t want to keep going as an empty shell in such a miserable state myself; sometimes being given a peaceful, painless death is truly the compassionate alternative.

That being said, the Canadian government has already proven they have abysmal judgement and no foresight to speak of when it comes to their MAID program. In 2024 it accounted for 1 out of every 20 deaths in the country. Allowing it for non-terminal conditions was a huge mistake, but clearly they’re never going to walk that back now. They’re well beyond normalizing euthanasia and suicide, they’re actively encouraging it.
 
Canadians are the most smug progressive KANTS you'll ever meet. I can't even feel that sad over the endless nightmare shit coming out of their country because this is EXACTLY. WHAT. THEY. ASKED. FOR.
 
What care? They're killing the baby and that's considered care?
They also said slippery slope.

Like, "Hey, we are murdering living babies, but it could actually get outrageous if we let it go further."
 
using infanticide to cull defective specimens? based, but i don't trust the jeet loving canada government to do it properly so this is probably going to turn out really bad.

Aldous Huxley wrote a book about this called Ape & Essence. It's pretty fucked up.

that's stupid as fuck.

im still pro choice but this is the point where they're born, this violates their consent at this point. just put them into adoption if you dont want a disabled kid. better yet, dont breed if you dont want to risk your child not being healthy, go adopt one of the many kids in the system. you get a kid regardless. if its something like 0 quality of life kids in constant pain who are going to die within x amount of days/months/couple of years anyway then i can see it, but past that, i can really see this being abused for, say, down syndrome kids that are otherwise going to be OK, maybe with a bit of support in some cases.

of course, this probably also means they'll probably just start euthanizing people in the adoption system next, knowing their luck.


I was thinking of cases like Zombaby and Baby K. Both of which were brainless babies who went on suffering because their parents insisted that they get expensive medical care that took staff and resources away from other patients. But then there are cases like Baby Doe, where the parents refused life saving surgery to their child because it had Downs. The baby died. People like that are the types that will euthanize a less than perfect child. It's a very slippery slope. Too slippery.
 
I hate living in this gay and evil and retarded world so much, when you have no solid bedrock for morals don't be surprised if shit like this happens to a country.
 
W for Canada. Eugenics is based and supported by all rational logic and science. Idk why it gets so many people riled up in they feels. We had a good thing going here with Sanger style eugenics and then the Nazis turned it up to 11 and we overcorrected in response.
There's a high chance they'll look for excuses to euthanize White babies while providing care to niglets and jeetlets that should objectively be euthanized. You and I both know this.
 
The day of the Rake cannot come soon enough, according to them.
 
Moloch finds a way. His insatiable appetite for literal baby back ribs cannot be contained.
You know. I used to think the whole 'Carthage sacrifices babies' thing was Roman propaganda to justify taking down their biggest competitor in the region.

This article has made me reconsider that view. If the leafs can do it, why not the elephants?

Canada delenda est.
 
If I was emperor of Canada, I'd pause MAiD services for overrepresented groups until underrepresented communities used it enough.

"It really is an appalling injustice that the hwites are hogging up all the Canadian Healthcare™️. Why should white Canadians be so much disproportionately more likely to receive the only medical procedure with a 0% complication rate? As a people who pride themselves on equity for all races and identities, we call on politicians to right this inequality and prioritize access to euthanasia for minorities that are a net drain on taxpayers, it is the only way to show that you care about them."

(any party is free to use this for a campaign ad, credit not needed, consider it a donation.)
 
You can bet your ass you'll have a Jeet doctor look at a white baby that is healthy and tell them "Saar, this baby has defect. I recommend MAID. Good service Saar. Yis."
Oh come on now, they’ll use to it abort female Jeets at an astounding rate. They’ll bring the sane issues they have in India here. A bunch of men who can’t get a match made and are now piss angry because their culture promises them a wife.
 
how is it eugenics in anyway?

Your killing off the good one to allow the Jeets to breed? That's like the opposite of eugenics. It's doing a reverse Hitler and sending all the Germans to the camps and letting the Jews take over the country.
You might need to recalibrate your understanding of good/bad. Every side thinks they're ackshually the good guys. Throughout all of human history, every side of every conflict always thinks they're actually the good guys.

You talk like concepts of good and bad are somehow static and mean the same things to everybody. Newsflash, they are not, and have never been. You are looking at it through the lens of 20th century eugenics, and you need to get with the times, chud! ITS CURRENT YEAR! And in CURRENT YEAR. Socialist Moral Relativism has seemingly come to the conclusion that "To beat the nazis, you must out-nazi the nazis." Beat them at their own game, and you never need to beat them again.

And so, now the people driving these policies think they are the "good ones," and we, as people of European stock, are the "bad ones."

no, child, you are the bad guy
enjoy being cleansed from the earth through soft eugenics and demographic warfare
 
Back
Top Bottom