Canada is a failed state

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Leaf Wage Slave Jr said:
Realistically a land war with America - on their own fucking border mind you - probably wouldn’t last 24 hours, and that’s me being incredibly generous. Even ignoring that the US Army is basically just the world’s greatest logistics company, Detroit alone is probably better armed than the entire Canadian Army. Just tell them that whoever gets Carney over the border gets EBT for life or something, shit would literally be resolved in hours…
Click to expand...
The 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum in Watertown, NY would probably capture Ottawa by the afternoon.
 
The Cum Beast said:
It's even funnier when you realize that Cucknadian reddit is a accurate representation of the actual country.

The kicker is that I've seen Canadians who say that all the jeets, shitskins, chinks, etc will make us BETTER at sports. 3 Problems with this claim.
1. Those types of immigrants are more into other sports like cricket that aren't as popular in Canada.
2. Hockey is more of a middle class sport, and Cucknada is trying to destroy the middle class
3. Even if lets say jeets are into hockey, all the ones that are skilled enough to play it will go to Amerikkka or even Europe rather than even think about going to Canada.

And all the jeets skilled enough to play it will go to other countries anyways. Also isn't India in the same position as Canada is for hockey, where they're both known for the sport but still suck at it.
Click to expand...

You have all these kickers, but don't state the simple reality - India has a billion and a half people and 41 combined olympic medals all time. They fucking suck at sports. Estonia, with a little over a million people, has more olympic medals than they do.

If Cricket ever supplanted speedwalking and became the 239th most popular American sport, we'd beat the shit out of them in that as well.
 
AnIntrepidCrow said:
You have all these kickers, but don't state the simple reality - India has a billion and a half people and 41 combined olympic medals all time. They fucking suck at sports. Estonia, with a little over a million people, has more olympic medals than they do.

If Cricket ever supplanted speedwalking and became the 239th most popular American sport, we'd beat the shit out of them in that as well.
Click to expand...
Keep in mind the USSR also took credit for Olympic medals before it collapsed. Estonia rejoined the Olympics as an independent country in 1991 and has won 44 medals since then. So a former soviet country with a population of little over one million has won more medals in 35 years than the Hindu sooperpooper has won in 126.
 
GluttonousManSlob said:
Keep in mind the USSR also took credit for Olympic medals before it collapsed. Estonia rejoined the Olympics as an independent country in 1991 and has won 44 medals since then. So a former soviet country with a population of little over one million has won more medals in 35 years than the Hindu sooperpooper has won in 126.
Click to expand...

38 all time Olympic appearances for the great super power, 41 medals total. Averaging about one medal an Olympic - 1.5 if you are being generous and disregard the 12 winter Olympic appearances where the jeets have notably not won a single medal, at all, in anything.

10 gold medals in total, so about 1 in every 4 appearances, and all but 2 of those are in field hockey, which, I guess, is the one thing Indians used to be good at. If you take that out, Indians have literally 2 individual gold medals in 126 years of Olympic performance.

Estonia is lapping the Indians with 14 gold medals in 35 years. Critical izzat losses for all these future Canadian competitors.
 
Last edited:
1771857192668.png

God has a sense of humor, and divine retribution apparently. This is an omen, if ever there was one.
 
wtfNeedSignUp said:
I don't know if it's a serious post or not. Even manufacturing wise China is losing the edge to Vietnam. They also have massive social, economic, political and demographic time bombs that will detonate in quick succession.
Click to expand...

The USA relying on importing millions of Browns to make up for its low fertility rate versus China having demographic time bombs but mostly homogeneous Han Chinese.

China wins.

There's no scenario a country wins by importing millions of Brown Third Worlders.

See, Canada.

Vietnam's manufacturing is mostly low-end goods, it spurs economic growth, but it doesn't make them at all a powerhouse. China has upscaled to robotics, AI, and microchips.

You need to look at several factors, Vietnam scores low on economic complexity because the goods they produce are not highly specialized. On top of that, they don't have vast oil and mineral reserves to fall back on. There is no inidication or plans for Vietnam to upscale to humanoid robotics and nuclear technology.

I can talk more about this but its entirely out of topic. China will break the middle income trap, and become a high income global power, even though their country is ageing they've already caught up to the USA in economic complexity (technological know-how and sophistication).

Canada's future is a lot less bright than China, let's put it that way. Canada doesn't even have a humanoid robotics industry. East Asia (Japan, Korea, China) have all surpassed Canada technologically by miles. The USA and the UK are the only other countries that can compete with East Asia, but them bringing millions of Third World Browns is gonna backfire.

Again, so many factors to include, like culture. Importing millions of Browns from Third World cultures is a burden, technological advancement is in some ways indirectly tied to hygiene, sanitation, safety, and cultural sophistication. We're replacing low birth rates with Third World culture and people. That's a f*cking disaster. You ain't getting Naboo, you're gonna get Coruscant.
 
Last edited:
karaokeman said:
The USA relying on importing millions of Browns to make up for its low fertility rate versus China having demographic time bombs but mostly homogeneous Han Chinese.

China wins.

There's no scenario a country wins by importing millions of Brown Third Worlders.

See, Canada.

Vietnam's manufacturing is mostly low-end goods, it spurs economic growth, but it doesn't make them at all a powerhouse. China has upscaled to robotics, AI, and microchips.

You need to look at several factors, Vietnam scores low on economic complexity because the goods they produce are not highly specialized. On top of that, they don't have vast oil and mineral reserves to fall back on. There is no inidication or plans for Vietnam to upscale to humanoid robotics and nuclear technology.

I can talk more about this but its entirely out of topic. China will break the middle income trap, and become a high income global power, even though their country is ageing they've already caught up to the USA in economic complexity (technological know-how and sophistication).

Canada's future is a lot less bright than China, let's put it that way. Canada doesn't even have a humanoid robotics industry. East Asia (Japan, Korea, China) have all surpassed Canada technologically by miles. The USA and the UK are the only other countries that can compete with East Asia, but them bringing millions of Third World Browns is gonna backfire.

Again, so many factors to include, like culture. Importing millions of Browns from Third World cultures is a burden, technological advancement is in some ways indirectly tied to hygiene, sanitation, safety, and cultural sophistication. We're replacing low birth rates with Third World culture and people. That's a f*cking disaster. You ain't getting Naboo, you're gonna get Coruscant.
Click to expand...
This is cope in a post. China is staring at a warring states period while Whites are looking at expulsions of the browns, start of the process though. Anyone else who counter signals this is a doomer faggot. Xpost from USPG2.

8596900-e7717bcf14f9f473fbad178f8239667f.webp
 
karaokeman said:
The USA relying on importing millions of Browns to make up for its low fertility rate versus China having demographic time bombs but mostly homogeneous Han Chinese.

China wins.

There's no scenario a country wins by importing millions of Brown Third Worlders.

See, Canada.

Vietnam's manufacturing is mostly low-end goods, it spurs economic growth, but it doesn't make them at all a powerhouse. China has upscaled to robotics, AI, and microchips.

You need to look at several factors, Vietnam scores low on economic complexity because the goods they produce are not highly specialized. On top of that, they don't have vast oil and mineral reserves to fall back on. There is no inidication or plans for Vietnam to upscale to humanoid robotics and nuclear technology.

I can talk more about this but its entirely out of topic. China will break the middle income trap, and become a high income global power, even though their country is ageing they've already caught up to the USA in economic complexity (technological know-how and sophistication).

Canada's future is a lot less bright than China, let's put it that way. Canada doesn't even have a humanoid robotics industry. East Asia (Japan, Korea, China) have all surpassed Canada technologically by mile.
Click to expand...
Wow there's a lot to unpack here:
* "At least Chinks are not Jeets" Is not the epic own you think it is. Yeah they are more cultured on average, but it's still a culture that will sell you food cooked in gutter oil. Plus "mostly homogeneous Han Chinese" is nonsensical for a country that large without freedom of movement or social mobility.
* China has never been, and will never be, hitech power house. The quality of what they make is far too low to be trusted, and any western company that did business with them got fucked in the process.
* China has lower fertility rate than western countries, you can add to it gender imbalance to make it even more pressing politically. The only advantage China has over the west is that they might enact total boomer death to stave off the economic catastrophe that is assured to happen.
* All the foreigners infesting Canada (or any western country) will leave once the gibs dry up and the economy goes under. They aren't there to stay and the population will get back to its more homogenic ratio.
 
wtfNeedSignUp said:
All the foreigners infesting Canada (or any western country) will leave once the gibs dry up and the economy goes under. They aren't there to stay and the population will get back to its more homogenic ratio.
Click to expand...
Very very very optimistic take
 
wtfNeedSignUp said:
They aren't there to stay and the population will get back to its more homogenic ratio
Click to expand...
I don't think this is really correct. There was a post the other day in this thread about how Muhamad was the most popular baby name in Alberta in 2025. Kids that grow up here aren't going to want to leave, but they'll still be raised in the ethnic ghettos in which their parents and grandparents established, and they will maintain those ethnic ghettos. They will still hold onto the backwards ideals and cultural remnants of their parents' countries, even when those countries long since evolve past them, and they will still leave a mark on the Canada.

There's a certain equilibrium that has to be maintained for the children of immigrants to fully integrate into their new country. Canada doesn't have this equilibrium.
 
wtfNeedSignUp said:
All the foreigners infesting Canada (or any western country) will leave once the gibs dry up and the economy goes under. They aren't there to stay and the population will get back to its more homogenic ratio
Click to expand...
A lot of these foreigners are used to a very low standard of living, and won't leave even when western countries become trash ridden hellholes like Birmingham
 
Long Dong Silver 2025 said:
Yeah, people tend to bring up BC as a stopgap against separation, but never ask how terrible it would be for BC itself. It would be locked away from the mainland and would only get worse if other provinces like Saskatchewan leave too. It has the sea, but no way from that sea to the east other than the arctic. It would be immensely difficult for BC to remain with Canada without some compromises with an independent Alberta.
Click to expand...

BC could connect to the mainland through the Northwest Territories. Too bad the environmentalists that run BC would never let any sort of transportation infrastructure that could do that be built.
 
kawaiikat420 said:
I don't think this is really correct. There was a post the other day in this thread about how Muhamad was the most popular baby name in Alberta in 2025. Kids that grow up here aren't going to want to leave, but they'll still be raised in the ethnic ghettos in which their parents and grandparents established, and they will maintain those ethnic ghettos. They will still hold onto the backwards ideals and cultural remnants of their parents' countries, even when those countries long since evolve past them, and they will still leave a mark on the Canada.

There's a certain equilibrium that has to be maintained for the children of immigrants to fully integrate into their new country. Canada doesn't have this equilibrium.
Click to expand...
Maybe a more apt way to phrase it is that the locust will move on to the next point. They won't return to their country, but continue to a next one as "environmental migrants". Yeah few will stay, but in places with weather such as Canada, any melanated people will eventually go insane from the lack of sun.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom