karaokeman
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2025
Being surrounded by Jeets is an assault on the eyes.
I just watched some Hong Kong cinema and even the Chinese look more pleasant.
Canada is a failed state
- Thread starter Sweetpeaa
- Start date
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
Being surrounded by Jeets is an assault on the eyes.
I just watched some Hong Kong cinema and even the Chinese look more pleasant.
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2021
I don't think it's a federal charge, the RCMP are just bringing him to Manitoba to face the regional court.
Sierra Death Generator
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2025
Virtually impossible to even mock their names because that's what their names actually are. They've got to have the least diversity of last names of any ethnic group. Even blacks have more choices of last names. Fucking every jeet's last name is singh
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2015
Aren't Koreans also lacking in diversity with last names too? But then again, it is to be expected since they're the Black Sheep of East Asian countries.
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2025
I was literally about to type this.
It's like that graduation video where they count how many Patels there are.
CowBoyCormack
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2020
If you want to see where things seriously went bad for Canada,
The surface answer is probably analogous to the US problem (neo liberalism in the 1980s, though this process was actually started under Jimmy Carter, etc).
So where did things start to go bad for Canada? The late 80s and the 90s, arguably.
NAFTA, in part, actually benefitted the Canadian upper middle class (managerial class) more than it did the American as it boosted that sector a bit for us, our finances, and to a degree out tech industry. It did ship off our industrial jobs to Mexico though, which is a separate issue.
Where things went bad is that this furthered the process of brain drain, and then when you get to the federal liberal party- you basically had a decade of corruption with them in charge.
We had the misappropriation of wealth, the economy concentrating in the hands of a few major corporations, and further oligopolization of our economy during this period.
When the corruption party ended, we got Harper. Harper, I don't want to get into here too much, but didn't really do a lot to change things- other than boosting the Albertan economy and oil.
The oligopoly continued, our own sectors remained uncompetitive, we were still too protectionist, and we didn't really actually grow our economy.
Small countries all have a few brands that are known globally and can compete globally. The Samsung republic is a thing, Burger King is owned by Brazilians, you have a few clothing brands from Scandinavia here, etc.
Where are the Canadian global companies?
When we had actual companies like blackberry, we let them the Chinese steal all the tech and let them die off. When we had our own aeronautics industry, we let it die, and it never completed internationally. If you look at the 90s and 2000s, it's constant stories of semi-innovation, only for various companies to remain completely insular within Canada, or to just die out.
But what about the successful ones? Most relocate to the US. Ones that don't basically become proxy branches of US companies, where they only survive because wages here are cheaper (EA Montreal). Some, like internet companies (pornhub) are kind of a thing, but still largely US based and I think more of a fluke than an actual indicator of success in the Canadian economy. Even Canada's biggest success story in this decade, Vice, relocated to NYC very early on. Canada is not a competitive market by design.
I think Canada could have been fine enough, but when you look at the corruption of the 90s federal liberals, the structural problems stemming from that decade, and a complete lack of innovation or competitiveness in the 2000s (which was not fixed by Harper) you get here as the next natural result.
All we have is oil now, and heavily inflated real estate. We went through a kind of slow burn where, living through it you wouldn't really notice the standard of living dropping- but when you get to actual economics, it poses the question of "what the fuck did Canada do during the 90s and 2000s to grow its economy"
And the answer is, basically jack.
The surface answer is probably analogous to the US problem (neo liberalism in the 1980s, though this process was actually started under Jimmy Carter, etc).
We can say that neoliberalism was the start of offshoring, deregulation of various industries, etc.
If you want what the actual philosophy of neoliberalism is, it's a "new libertarianism". It's not quite libertarianism, because the belief is that the free market can't actually survive without the state and state protection (contradictory, right? But also look at the business cartels in Canada and their protectionism); but it's a situation where you also don't want state control.
So what do you do? The government, in neoliberalism, is effectively the cheerleader for the free market. You get the deregulation, and when there's an economic recession, the government steps in to "cheer on" the market with massive bailouts, tax infusions, tax breaks, etc.
Neoliberalism, in the US at least, also has the duel effect that the government embraces the free market to try to solve social problems (instead of, you knows the government itself). Black people are poor and not homeowners? Well, under Clinton- let's incentivize banks to give black people loans with less scrutiny, and give these banks tax breaks if they do (once again, quene a decade later later to the subprime mortgage crisis).
I could go on about neoliberalism and it's political structure, but this thread is about Canada.
In Canada, you see it manifest as well in its own ways. The government predicts a tax shortage and shortage of labour in the future? They're not going to solve this issue themselves, they're going to
A) deregulate immigration
B) encourage private colleges to amp up student enrollment
C) make it easier for students to gain permanent residency
D) 9 million Indians later and profit???
And wa la, the government cheers on the private sector to 'solve social problems'. It's a devilish system and approach that diffuses responsibility for actual government policy to the point where no-one knows who to blame, and noone involved in the mess takes actual responsibility.
If you want what the actual philosophy of neoliberalism is, it's a "new libertarianism". It's not quite libertarianism, because the belief is that the free market can't actually survive without the state and state protection (contradictory, right? But also look at the business cartels in Canada and their protectionism); but it's a situation where you also don't want state control.
So what do you do? The government, in neoliberalism, is effectively the cheerleader for the free market. You get the deregulation, and when there's an economic recession, the government steps in to "cheer on" the market with massive bailouts, tax infusions, tax breaks, etc.
Neoliberalism, in the US at least, also has the duel effect that the government embraces the free market to try to solve social problems (instead of, you knows the government itself). Black people are poor and not homeowners? Well, under Clinton- let's incentivize banks to give black people loans with less scrutiny, and give these banks tax breaks if they do (once again, quene a decade later later to the subprime mortgage crisis).
I could go on about neoliberalism and it's political structure, but this thread is about Canada.
In Canada, you see it manifest as well in its own ways. The government predicts a tax shortage and shortage of labour in the future? They're not going to solve this issue themselves, they're going to
A) deregulate immigration
B) encourage private colleges to amp up student enrollment
C) make it easier for students to gain permanent residency
D) 9 million Indians later and profit???
And wa la, the government cheers on the private sector to 'solve social problems'. It's a devilish system and approach that diffuses responsibility for actual government policy to the point where no-one knows who to blame, and noone involved in the mess takes actual responsibility.
So where did things start to go bad for Canada? The late 80s and the 90s, arguably.
NAFTA, in part, actually benefitted the Canadian upper middle class (managerial class) more than it did the American as it boosted that sector a bit for us, our finances, and to a degree out tech industry. It did ship off our industrial jobs to Mexico though, which is a separate issue.
Where things went bad is that this furthered the process of brain drain, and then when you get to the federal liberal party- you basically had a decade of corruption with them in charge.
We had the misappropriation of wealth, the economy concentrating in the hands of a few major corporations, and further oligopolization of our economy during this period.
When the corruption party ended, we got Harper. Harper, I don't want to get into here too much, but didn't really do a lot to change things- other than boosting the Albertan economy and oil.
The oligopoly continued, our own sectors remained uncompetitive, we were still too protectionist, and we didn't really actually grow our economy.
Small countries all have a few brands that are known globally and can compete globally. The Samsung republic is a thing, Burger King is owned by Brazilians, you have a few clothing brands from Scandinavia here, etc.
Where are the Canadian global companies?
When we had actual companies like blackberry, we let them the Chinese steal all the tech and let them die off. When we had our own aeronautics industry, we let it die, and it never completed internationally. If you look at the 90s and 2000s, it's constant stories of semi-innovation, only for various companies to remain completely insular within Canada, or to just die out.
But what about the successful ones? Most relocate to the US. Ones that don't basically become proxy branches of US companies, where they only survive because wages here are cheaper (EA Montreal). Some, like internet companies (pornhub) are kind of a thing, but still largely US based and I think more of a fluke than an actual indicator of success in the Canadian economy. Even Canada's biggest success story in this decade, Vice, relocated to NYC very early on. Canada is not a competitive market by design.
I think Canada could have been fine enough, but when you look at the corruption of the 90s federal liberals, the structural problems stemming from that decade, and a complete lack of innovation or competitiveness in the 2000s (which was not fixed by Harper) you get here as the next natural result.
All we have is oil now, and heavily inflated real estate. We went through a kind of slow burn where, living through it you wouldn't really notice the standard of living dropping- but when you get to actual economics, it poses the question of "what the fuck did Canada do during the 90s and 2000s to grow its economy"
And the answer is, basically jack.
Last edited:
Lobster Cult High Priest
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2021
The PPC is another party filled to the brim with lolcows. They had that semen retention guru, Max is a lolcow (just smart enough to not be outwardly a lolcow, but then again he caused a national security scandal when he left government documents at his Big tittied GF's who was affiliated with the Hells Angels House.
Hadrian Trudeau (the younger son) will live up his namesake and will finish off the Kikes.
Nah that would be Lincoln who had personal correspondence with Karl Marx and got half a million White men killed over the question of Niggers.
foreman 89
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2021
The south started the civil war and slavery is a fundamentally immoral institution. Even from a White nationalist perspective, the African population would have grown at a faster rate with the plantation owners wanting to keep their free labour and there likely would have been a Haitian style mass uprising.
OutInTheRain
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 6, 2022
That was NORTEL. In the late 90s early 2000s NORTEL was huge, but suddenly Chinese companies were outbidding NORTEL on every contract. On top of that every piece of tech NORTEL was coming out with, suddenly ended up with a Chinese knock off. NORTEL ends up going under and years later the Department of National Defence is ordered to move into NORTELs abandoned headquarters. The second the went in their they found that every outlet, every phoneline, every internet line was bugged. It set the move back by years as they essentially had to strip everything and rebuild. The Canadian government just kept it quiet.
As for Canadian companies, the rule is get big, get big fast, and get get big quietly. Blackberry, Shopify got huge and managed to avoid the eye of the government on their way up. Eventually they got big enough so the Federal and Provincial governments couldn't outright fuck with them. It also helps that both of those companies were in sectors that the Government doesn't understand. Now Shopify is looking to exit Canada and honestly I don't blame them. Business in Canada is so controlled and so difficult to get into. You have every level of government attempting to shake you down. Including ones that aren't even near you. Now we've emboldened the native tribes to demand their bribes as well.
The brain drain has done more damage than people realize. With the ease of acquiring a NAFTA visa, it meant that everyone with an in demand technical degree could just run south. Look at how many tech companies have Canadian engineers. It's most of them. Not that I blame them, the Canadian tech sector is anemic and you're not working in the cutting edge. Why make 70k to live in Toronto and work on some betting app, when you could move down south, make more, pay less and work with the best of the best? Look at Doctors, they make fuck all in Canada, are expected to run a practice, hire employees and we put a cap on their earnings.
Of course it worked out for the Canadian political and business establishment. Those who benefit from the status quo will remain and ensure it remains in place. Those who don't now have an option to escape and not remain to make trouble for the establishment. Look at Canadian politicians, not exactly an inspiring bunch. PP is a dork, Carney is a tool, the NDP want to be American Democrats. As long as the US remains a pressure release valve for aspirational Canadians the decline will continue.
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2023
NDP wants to be Americangbtq communist party.
Canada fucked itself and it's finally showing cracks.
Venezuela was once the jewel of Latin America.
Argentina was once USA of Latin America (which is returning to prosperity currently thanks to Milei).
The age of freeloading is over for Canada.
No more cheap drug prices from USA.
No more cheap technology and machinery from USA.
No more cheap visa exports to USA.
No more freeloading off American market.
Canada fucked itself and it's finally showing cracks.
Venezuela was once the jewel of Latin America.
Argentina was once USA of Latin America (which is returning to prosperity currently thanks to Milei).
The age of freeloading is over for Canada.
No more cheap drug prices from USA.
No more cheap technology and machinery from USA.
No more cheap visa exports to USA.
No more freeloading off American market.
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2025
It's an ethno-religious thing.
Every male Sikh is meant to take the surname "Singh," which means "Lion," and every female Sikh is to take the surname "Kaur," which means "Princess." Most Sikhs choose their child's name by opening a random page of their holy book and blindly pointing to a word, that word will be the name of their child once attached to a common suffix (e.g., preet, jeet, etc.). That's why so many of them have the name blueprint of [noun]+[noun], e.g., "Preetjeet" = "Preet" + "Jeet," i.e., "Love" + "Victory."
Not every Punjabi will have the last name Singh or Kaur; if the family comes from a higher caste in Punjab, they'll often retain surnames relating to that caste. E.g., the Dhaliwhals. Sikhism is supposed to be an anti-caste religion, but the roaches are so retardedly obsessed with caste that some still can't fully commit to their religious beliefs. In the same vein, not every Indian is a Sikh, but Sikhs (and Punjabis in general) are over-represented in the roach diaspora in Canada because of the Khalistan-related political troubles in India. Indians that belong to different religions, or come from different regions, have more varied surnames, but usually those surnames are related to caste in some minute way.
P.S. EDIT: Their surnames can be a way to easily identify their origin and also their personal or familial identity. For example, there was a joke going around during the last election that there are many MPs with the surname "Dhaliwhal" (or some similarly spelt transliteration). The surname Dhaliwhal is associated with high-caste in Punjab, and the Dhaliwhal surname is well-known there for their large land shares, business ventures, and previous political intrigues. It's interesting that the majority of the politicians in Canada of Sikh background come from this background - especially when one recalls that the majority of Sikh politicians are voted for based on their reputations within the gurdwaras (i.e., the Sikh places of worship). Obviously, members of the high-caste will be more respected within the gurdwaras, and more likely to be endorsed by religious leaders. It's interesting how caste-related discrimination is already starting to infiltrate the Canadian government at all levels.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2023
It's only been two centuries since gooks ended slavery/serfdom. Most of koreans were slaves to nobles or didn't have any surnames.
Unlike Chinese and Japs, who draw their heritage from clans and family lineage, Koreans draw their heritage from single ethnic heritage. Surnames aren't that important. Their forenames are incredibly varied and thoughtout, however.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2021
You WILL go and fight for globohomo, and you WILL be happy
Lobster Cult High Priest
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2021
No matter what caste they are they must acknowledge that Whites are superior (at the top of their stupid caste system) and they are all Pajeets,
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2021
It largely comes down to industry. We don't seem to have any because almost all the established ones are resource extractors: e.g. Suncor, Enbridge, Teck, CNRL, Nutrien. Not the sort of thing media likes to fawn over like tech unicorns (and because almost all are headquarted out west) so a lot of the success stories get ignored.
Lobster Cult High Priest
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2021
Fuck Enbridge as it's basically a monopoly on heating utilities. Should be nationalized.
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2021
I once worked with an Indian girl named... and I kid you not, Gagandeep.
Hairier arms then a gorilla. True story.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2018
Gagandeep, Suckdeep, Damshiet, Manrape... many such cases.
AstaSilva
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2019
^That's basically the TLDR right there. As an American I welcome (white) Canadians coming down to the states since they blend in and assimilate better than other groups. Let Canada hollow itself out. Within a generation or two, it'll be forced to sign deals with the US that solidify its vassal state. There's no use crying over it.